skip to main content
10.1145/3209978.3210007acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Between Clicks and Satisfaction: Study on Multi-Phase User Preferences and Satisfaction for Online News Reading

Published: 27 June 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Click signal has been widely used for designing and evaluating interactive information systems, which is taken as the indicator of user preference. However, click signal does not capture post-click user experience. Very commonly, the user first clicked an item and then found it is not what he wanted after reading its content, which shows there is a gap between user click and user actual preference. Previous studies on web search have incorporated other user behaviors, such as dwell time, to reduce the gap. Unfortunately, for other scenarios such as recommendation and online news reading, there still lacks a thorough understanding of the relationship between click and user preference, and the corresponding reasons which are the focus of this work. Based on an in-depth laboratory user study of online news reading scenario in the mobile environment, we show that click signal does not align with user preference. Besides, we find that user preference changes frequently, hence preferences in three phases are proposed: Before-Read Preference, After-Read Preference and Post-task Preference. In addition, the statistic analysis shows that the changes are highly related to news quality and the context of user interactions. Meanwhile, many other user behaviors, like viewport time, dwell time, and read speed, are found reflecting user preference in different phases. Furthermore, with the help of various kinds of user behaviors, news quality, and interaction context, we build an effective model to predict whether the user actually likes the clicked news. Finally, we replace binary click signals of traditional click-based evaluation metrics, like Click-Through Rate, with the predicted item-level preference, and significant improvements are achieved in estimating the user's list-level satisfaction. Our work sheds light on the understanding of user click behaviors and provides a method for better estimating user interest and satisfaction. The proposed model could also be helpful to various recommendation tasks in mobile scenarios.

References

[1]
Antti Ajanki, David R Hardoon, Samuel Kaski, Kai Puolam"aki, and John Shawe-Taylor . 2009. Can eyes reveal interest? Implicit queries from gaze patterns. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction Vol. 19, 4 (2009), 307--339.
[2]
Nicholas J Belkin, Michael Cole, and Ralf Bierig . 2008. Is relevance the right criterion for evaluating interactive information retrieval Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR 2008 Workshop on Beyond Binary Relevance: Preferences, Diversity, and Set-Level Judgments. http://research. microsoft. com/ pauben/bbr-workshop.
[3]
Nicholas J Belkin, Michael Cole, and Jingjing Liu . 2009. A model for evaluation of interactive information retrieval Proceedings of the SIGIR 2009 Workshop on the Future of IR Evaluation. 7--8.
[4]
Olivier Chapelle, Donald Metlzer, Ya Zhang, and Pierre Grinspan . 2009. Expected reciprocal rank for graded relevance. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, 621--630.
[5]
Olivier Chapelle and Ya Zhang . 2009. A dynamic bayesian network click model for web search ranking Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web. ACM, 1--10.
[6]
Ye Chen, Ke Zhou, Yiqun Liu, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma . 2017. Meta-evaluation of Online and O line Web Search Evaluation Metrics. SIGIR.
[7]
Aleksandr Chuklin, Pavel Serdyukov, and Maarten De Rijke . 2013. Click model-based information retrieval metrics. Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 493--502.
[8]
Michael Cole, Jingjing Liu, NJ Belkin, R Bierig, J Gwizdka, C Liu, J Zhang, and X Zhang . 2009. Usefulness as the criterion for evaluation of interactive information retrieval. Proc. HCIR (2009), 1--4.
[9]
Janez Demvsar . 2006. Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. Journal of Machine learning research Vol. 7, Jan (2006), 1--30.
[10]
Georges E Dupret and Benjamin Piwowarski . 2008. A user browsing model to predict search engine click data from past observations. Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 331--338.
[11]
Steve Fox, Kuldeep Karnawat, Mark Mydland, Susan Dumais, and Thomas White . 2005. Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), Vol. 23, 2 (2005), 147--168.
[12]
Fan Guo, Chao Liu, and Yi Min Wang . 2009. Efficient multiple-click models in web search. In Proceedings of the second acm international conference on web search and data mining. ACM, 124--131.
[13]
Ahmed Hassan . 2012. A semi-supervised approach to modeling web search satisfaction Proceedings of the 35th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 275--284.
[14]
Yifan Hu, Yehuda Koren, and Chris Volinsky . 2008. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets Data Mining, 2008. ICDM'08. Eighth IEEE International Conference on. Ieee, 263--272.
[15]
Jeff Huang and Abdigani Diriye . 2012. Web user interaction mining from touch-enabled mobile devices HCIR workshop.
[16]
Jiepu Jiang, Ahmed Hassan Awadallah, Xiaolin Shi, and Ryen W White . 2015. Understanding and predicting graded search satisfaction Proceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 57--66.
[17]
Jiepu Jiang, Daqing He, and James Allan . 2017. Comparing In Situ and Multidimensional Relevance Judgments. (2017).
[18]
Thorsten Joachims, Laura Granka, Bing Pan, Helene Hembrooke, and Geri Gay . 2017. Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback ACM SIGIR Forum, Vol. Vol. 51. Acm, 4--11.
[19]
Thorsten Joachims, Laura Granka, Bing Pan, Helene Hembrooke, Filip Radlinski, and Geri Gay . 2007. Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), Vol. 25, 2 (2007), 7.
[20]
Diane Kelly . 2009. Methods for evaluating interactive information retrieval systems with users. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, Vol. 3, 1-2 (2009), 1--224.
[21]
Youngho Kim, Ahmed Hassan, Ryen W White, and Imed Zitouni . 2014. Modeling dwell time to predict click-level satisfaction Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. ACM, 193--202.
[22]
Julia Kiseleva, Kyle Williams, Ahmed Hassan Awadallah, Aidan C Crook, Imed Zitouni, and Tasos Anastasakos . 2016. Predicting user satisfaction with intelligent assistants Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 45--54.
[23]
Dmitry Lagun, Chih-Hung Hsieh, Dale Webster, and Vidhya Navalpakkam . 2014. Towards better measurement of attention and satisfaction in mobile search Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval. ACM, 113--122.
[24]
Dmitry Lagun and Mounia Lalmas . 2016. Understanding user attention and engagement in online news reading Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 113--122.
[25]
Yixuan Li, Pingmei Xu, Dmitry Lagun, and Vidhya Navalpakkam . 2017. Towards Measuring and Inferring User Interest from Gaze Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 525--533.
[26]
Yiqun Liu, Ye Chen, Jinhui Tang, Jiashen Sun, Min Zhang, Shaoping Ma, and Xuan Zhu . 2015. Different users, different opinions: Predicting search satisfaction with mouse movement information. In Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 493--502.
[27]
Zeyang Liu, Jiaxin Mao, Chao Wang, Qingyao Ai, Yiqun Liu, and Jian-Yun Nie . 2017. Enhancing click models with mouse movement information. Information Retrieval Journal Vol. 20, 1 (2017), 53--80.
[28]
Jiaxin Mao, Yiqun Liu, Huanbo Luan, Min Zhang, Shaoping Ma, Hengliang Luo, and Yuntao Zhang . 2017. Understanding and Predicting Usefulness Judgment in Web Search Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 1169--1172.
[29]
Jiaxin Mao, Yiqun Liu, Ke Zhou, Jian Yun Nie, Jingtao Song, Min Zhang, Hengliang Luo, Hengliang Luo, and Hengliang Luo . 2016. When does Relevance Mean Usefulness and User Satisfaction in Web Search? International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 463--472.
[30]
Rong Pan, Yunhong Zhou, Bin Cao, Nathan N Liu, Rajan Lukose, Martin Scholz, and Qiang Yang . 2008. One-class collaborative filtering. In Data Mining, 2008. ICDM'08. Eighth IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 502--511.
[31]
Tetsuya Sakai . 2013. How intuitive are diversified search metrics? Concordance test results for the diversity U-measures. In Asia Information Retrieval Symposium. Springer, 13--24.
[32]
Chao Wang, Yiqun Liu, Min Zhang, Shaoping Ma, Meihong Zheng, Jing Qian, and Kuo Zhang . 2013. Incorporating vertical results into search click models Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 503--512.
[33]
Peifeng Yin, Ping Luo, Wang-Chien Lee, and Min Wang . 2013. Silence is also evidence: interpreting dwell time for recommendation from psychological perspective. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 989--997.
[34]
Yisong Yue, Rajan Patel, and Hein Roehrig . 2010. Beyond position bias: Examining result attractiveness as a source of presentation bias in clickthrough data. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web. ACM, 1011--1018.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Asymmetric Consumptive News Feed Curation? Examining How Perceived News Feed Performance Influences Boosting and Limiting Curation on FacebookSocial Media + Society10.1177/2056305124130638210:4Online publication date: 19-Dec-2024
  • (2024)Explaining Neural News Recommendation with Attributions onto Reading HistoriesACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/367323316:1(1-25)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Improving Multi-modal Recommender Systems by Denoising and Aligning Multi-modal Content and User FeedbackProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3637528.3671703(3645-3656)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Between Clicks and Satisfaction: Study on Multi-Phase User Preferences and Satisfaction for Online News Reading

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGIR '18: The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval
        June 2018
        1509 pages
        ISBN:9781450356572
        DOI:10.1145/3209978
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 27 June 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. click-through rate
        2. item-level preference
        3. multi-phase user preference
        4. user behavior analysis
        5. user satisfaction

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Funding Sources

        Conference

        SIGIR '18
        Sponsor:

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGIR '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 86 of 409 submissions, 21%;
        Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)90
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)18
        Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)Asymmetric Consumptive News Feed Curation? Examining How Perceived News Feed Performance Influences Boosting and Limiting Curation on FacebookSocial Media + Society10.1177/2056305124130638210:4Online publication date: 19-Dec-2024
        • (2024)Explaining Neural News Recommendation with Attributions onto Reading HistoriesACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/367323316:1(1-25)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
        • (2024)Improving Multi-modal Recommender Systems by Denoising and Aligning Multi-modal Content and User FeedbackProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3637528.3671703(3645-3656)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2024
        • (2024)RADio* – An Introduction to Measuring Normative Diversity in News RecommendationsACM Transactions on Recommender Systems10.1145/36364653:1(1-29)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2024
        • (2024)Teach and Explore: A Multiplex Information-guided Effective and Efficient Reinforcement Learning for Sequential RecommendationACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/363000342:5(1-26)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2024
        • (2024)Interpretable Triplet Importance for Personalized RankingProceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3627673.3679536(809-818)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
        • (2024)Inverse Learning with Extremely Sparse Feedback for RecommendationProceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3616855.3635797(396-404)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2024
        • (2024)Characterizing Internet Card User Portraits for Efficient Churn Prediction Model DesignIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2023.324120623:2(1735-1752)Online publication date: Feb-2024
        • (2024)Denoised Graph Collaborative Filtering via Neighborhood Similarity and Dynamic ThresholdingIEEE Transactions on Big Data10.1109/TBDATA.2024.345376510:6(683-693)Online publication date: Dec-2024
        • (2024)RAIN: Reconstructed-aware in-context enhancement with graph denoising for session-based recommendationNeural Networks10.1016/j.neunet.2024.107056(107056)Online publication date: Dec-2024
        • Show More Cited By

        View Options

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Figures

        Tables

        Media

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media