skip to main content
10.1145/3209978.3210082acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

A Living Lab Study of Query Amendment in Job Search

Published:27 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Errors in formulation of queries made by users can lead to poor search results pages. We performed a living lab study using online A/B testing to measure the degree of improvement achieved with a query amendment technique when applied to a commercial job search engine. Of particular interest in this case study is a clear 'success' signal, namely, the number of job applications lodged by a user as a result of querying the service. A set of 276 queries was identified for amendment in four different categories through the use of word embeddings, with large gains in conversion rates being attained in all four of those categories. Our analysis of query reformulations also provides a better understanding of user satisfaction in the case of problematic queries (ones with fewer results than fill a single page) by observing that users tend to reformulate rewritten queries less.

References

  1. A. H. Awadallah, X. Shi, N. Craswell, and B. Ramsey. 2013. Beyond clicks: Query reformulation as a predictor of search satisfaction Proc. CIKM. 2019--2028. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. P. D. Bruza and S. Dennis. 1997. Query reformulation on the internet: Empirical data and the hyperindex search engine Proc. RIAO. 488--499. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. F. Cai and M. de Rijke. 2016. Selectively personalizing query auto-completion. In Proc. SIGIR. 993--996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Carpineto and G. Romano. 2012. A survey of automatic query expansion in information retrieval. ACM Comp. Surv. Vol. 44, 1 (2012), 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Gao, X. Li, D. Micol, C. Quirk, and X. Sun. 2010. A large scale ranker-based system for search query spelling correction Proc. COLING. 358--366. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. K. Hofmann, L. Li, and F. Radlinski. 2016. Online evaluation for information retrieval. Found. & Trends in IR Vol. 10, 1 (2016), 1--117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Huang and E. N. Efthimiadis. 2009. Analyzing and evaluating query reformulation strategies in web search logs Proc. CIKM. 77--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Kusner, Y. Sun, N. Kolkin, and K. Weinberger. 2015. From word embeddings to document distances. In Proc. ICML. 957--966. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. T. Mikolov, K. Chen, G. Corrado, and J. Dean. 2013. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space Proc. ICLR Wrkshp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Saha and D. Arya. 2017. Generalized mixed effect models for personalizing job search Proc. SIGIR. 1129--1132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Shokouhi, R. Jones, U. Ozertem, K. Raghunathan, and F. Diaz. 2014. Mobile query reformulations. In Proc. SIGIR. 1011--1014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. D. Spina, M. Maistro, Y. Ren, S. Sadeghi, W. Wong, T. Baldwin, L. Cavedon, A. Moffat, M. Sanderson, F. Scholer, and J. Zobel. 2017. Understanding user behavior in job and talent search: An Initial Investigation Proc. SIGIR Wrkshp. eCommerce.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Wang, W. Zhang, and S. Yuan. 2017. Display advertising with real-time bidding (RTB) and behavioural targeting. Found. & Trends in IR Vol. 11, 4--5 (2017), 297--435. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A Living Lab Study of Query Amendment in Job Search

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGIR '18: The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval
        June 2018
        1509 pages
        ISBN:9781450356572
        DOI:10.1145/3209978

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 27 June 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGIR '18 Paper Acceptance Rate86of409submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader