skip to main content
10.1145/3209978.3210140acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

What Do Viewers Say to Their TVs?: An Analysis of Voice Queries to Entertainment Systems

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

A recently-introduced product of Comcast, a large cable company in the United States, is a "voice remote" that accepts spoken queries from viewers. We present an analysis of a large query log from this service to answer the question: "What do viewers say to their TVs?" In addition to a descriptive characterization of queries and sessions, we describe two complementary types of analyses to support query understanding. First, we propose a domain-specific intent taxonomy to characterize viewer behavior: as expected, most intents revolve around watching programs---both direct navigation as well as browsing---but there is a non-trivial fraction of non-viewing intents as well. Second, we propose a domain-specific tagging scheme for labeling query tokens, that when combined with intent and program prediction, provides a multi-faceted approach to understand voice queries directed at entertainment systems.

References

  1. A. Acero, N. Bernstein, R. Chambers, Y. C. Ju, X. Li, J. Odell, P. Nguyen, O. Scholz, and G. Zweig. 2008. Live Search for Mobile: Web Services by Voice on the Cellphone. ICASSP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. C. Chelba and J. Schalkwyk. 2013. Empirical Exploration of Language Modeling for the google.com Query Stream as Applied to Mobile Voice Search. Mobile Speech and Advanced Natural Language Solutions.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. Feng and S. Bangalore. 2009. Effects of Word Confusion Networks on Voice Search. EACL. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. I. Guy. 2016. Searching by Talking: Analysis of Voice Queries on Mobile Web Search. SIGIR. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. L. Kong, C. Alberti, D. Andor, I. Bogatyy, and D. Weiss. 2017. DRAGNN: A Transition-based Framework for Dynamically Connected Neural Networks. arXiv:1703.04474.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. H. Liao, G. Pundak, O. Siohan, M. Carroll, N. Coccaro, Q. Jiang, T. Sainath, A. Senior, F. Beaufays, and M. Bacchiani. 2015. Large Vocabulary Automatic Speech Recognition for Children. Interspeech.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. T. Mikolov, I. Sutskever, K. Chen, G. Corrado, and J. Dean. 2013. Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality. NIPS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Rao, F. Ture, H. He, O. Jojic, and J. Lin. 2017. Talking to Your TV: Context-Aware Voice Search with Hierarchical Recurrent Neural Networks. CIKM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. Schalkwyk, D. Beeferman, F. Beaufays, B. Byrne, C. Chelba, M. Cohen, M. Garrett, and B. Strope. 2010. "Your Word is My Command": Google Search by Voice: A Case Study. Advances in Speech Recognition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. Shan, G. Wu, Z. Hu, X. Tang, M. Jansche, and P. Moreno. 2010. Search by Voice in Mandarin Chinese. INTERSPEECH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Y. Wang, D. Yu, Y. Ju, and A. Acero. 2008. An Introduction to Voice Search. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 25, 3, 29--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Yi and F. Maghoul. 2011. Mobile Search Pattern Evolution: The Trend and the Impact of Voice Queries. WWW. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. What Do Viewers Say to Their TVs?: An Analysis of Voice Queries to Entertainment Systems

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGIR '18: The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval
        June 2018
        1509 pages
        ISBN:9781450356572
        DOI:10.1145/3209978

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 27 June 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGIR '18 Paper Acceptance Rate86of409submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader