skip to main content
10.1145/3210377.3210661acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesspaaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Brief Announcement: Stamp-it, a more Thread-efficient, Concurrent Memory Reclamation Scheme in the C++ Memory Model

Published: 11 July 2018 Publication History

Abstract

We present Stamp-it, a new, general, portable, lock-less concurrent memory reclamation scheme with amortized, constant-time (thread-count independent) reclamation overhead. Stamp-it has been implemented and proved correct in the C++ memory model using as weak memory-consistency assumptions as possible. We have (re)implemented six other comparable reclamation schemes. By a detailed performance comparison, we show that Stamp-it performs favorably, sometimes better, but at least as good as these other schemes while being able to reclaim free memory nodes earlier.

References

[1]
Trevor Alexander Brown. 2015. Reclaiming Memory for Lock-Free Data Structures: There Has to Be a Better Way. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC). ACM, 261--270.
[2]
Keir Fraser. 2004. Practical lock-freedom. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory.
[3]
Thomas E. Hart, Paul E. McKenney, Angela Demke Brown, and Jonathan Walpole. 2007. Performance of Memory Reclamation for Lockless Synchronization. J. Parallel and Distrib. Comput. 67, 12 (2007), 1270--1285.
[4]
Maged M. Michael. 2004. Hazard Pointers: Safe Memory Reclamation for LockFree Objects. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 15, 6 (2004), 491--504.
[5]
Manuel Pöter. 2018. Effective Memory Reclamation for Lock-Free Data Structures in C++. Master's thesis. TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
[6]
Manuel Pöter and Jesper Larsson Träff. 2017. A new and five older Concurrent Memory Reclamation Schemes in Comparison (Stamp-it). (2017). arXiv:1712.06134.
[7]
Manuel Pöter and Jesper Larsson Träff. 2018. POSTER: Stamp-it, Amortized Constant-time Memory Reclamation in Comparison to five other Schemes. In 23rd ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming (PPoPP). ACM, 413--414.
[8]
Manuel Pöter and Jesper Larsson Träff. 2018. Stamp-it: A more Thread-efficient, Concurrent Memory Reclamation Scheme in the C++ Memory Model. (2018).
[9]
Arch D. Robison. 2013. Policy-Based Design for Safe Destruction in Concurrent Containers. C++ standards committee paper, http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/ wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3712.pdf. (2013).
[10]
Håkan Sundell and Philippas Tsigas. 2008. Lock-free deques and doubly linked lists. J. Parallel and Distrib. Comput. 68, 7 (2008), 1008--1020.
[11]
John D. Valois. 1995. Lock-Free Data Structures. Ph.D. Dissertation. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Family of Fast and Memory Efficient Lock- and Wait-Free ReclamationProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36588518:PLDI(2174-2198)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Expediting Hazard Pointers with Bounded RCU Critical SectionsProceedings of the 36th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures10.1145/3626183.3659941(1-13)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
  • (2021)Snapshot-free, transparent, and robust memory reclamation for lock-free data structuresProceedings of the 42nd ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation10.1145/3453483.3454090(987-1002)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Brief Announcement: Stamp-it, a more Thread-efficient, Concurrent Memory Reclamation Scheme in the C++ Memory Model

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SPAA '18: Proceedings of the 30th on Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures
    July 2018
    437 pages
    ISBN:9781450357999
    DOI:10.1145/3210377
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 11 July 2018

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Abstract

    Conference

    SPAA '18
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    SPAA '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 36 of 120 submissions, 30%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 447 of 1,461 submissions, 31%

    Upcoming Conference

    SPAA '25
    37th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures
    July 28 - August 1, 2025
    Portland , OR , USA

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)A Family of Fast and Memory Efficient Lock- and Wait-Free ReclamationProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36588518:PLDI(2174-2198)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Expediting Hazard Pointers with Bounded RCU Critical SectionsProceedings of the 36th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures10.1145/3626183.3659941(1-13)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
    • (2021)Snapshot-free, transparent, and robust memory reclamation for lock-free data structuresProceedings of the 42nd ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation10.1145/3453483.3454090(987-1002)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2021
    • (2020)Universal wait-free memory reclamationProceedings of the 25th ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming10.1145/3332466.3374540(130-143)Online publication date: 19-Feb-2020

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media