skip to main content
10.1145/3210377.3210662acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesspaaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
announcement

Brief Announcement: Communication in Systems of Home Based Mobile Agents

Published:11 July 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

We consider a scenario where agents have to exchange data in a wireless ad-hoc network, although it is not connected. We assume that each agent has a static home base. To improve connectivity, each agent is allowed to move away from his home base, but only for a limited distance which may be different for different agents. These distances might be dictated by limited batteries of the agents, which forces them to return to their home charging station after a while. An application currently widely considered in literature (and in projects and applications) is disaster management, where helpers are equipped with smartphones to submit important local information to a coordinating station. In case of the network being disconnected, mobile "postmen'' are used for long distance connections. In this paper, we focus on the aspect of "communication by postmen''. We model such a scenario by a weighted directed graph. It consists of n (static) nodes describing the home bases of the agents. A directed edge from base $v_i$ to base $v_j$ with weight $w(v_i,v_j)$ indicates that agent $a_i$ can walk from his home base to the home base of $a_j$, which needs time $w(v_i,v_j)$. If agent $a_j$ is at home when agent $a_i$ arrives, they can exchange messages. % Alongside with the introduction of the model, we present a randomized distributed algorithm for all-to-all message dissemination and show that its performance is, in many cases, close to optimal.

References

  1. Marco Conti and Silvia Giordano . 2014. Mobile ad hoc networking: milestones, challenges, and new research directions. IEEE Communications Magazine Vol. 52, 1 (2014), 85--96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Erik D. Demaine, Mohammadtaghi Hajiaghayi, Hamid Mahini, Amin S. Sayedi-Roshkhar, Shayan Oveisgharan, and Morteza Zadimoghaddam . 2009. Minimizing movement. ACM Transactions on Algorithms Vol. 5, 3 (2009), 1--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Marco Di Felice, Luca Bedogni, Angelo Trotta, Luciano Bononi, Fabio Panzieri, Giuseppe Ruggeri, Gianluca Aloi, Valeria Loscri, and Pasquale Pace . 2013 a. Smartphones like stem cells: Cooperation and evolution for emergency communication in post-disaster scenarios. Proceedings of the 1st International Black Sea Conference on Communications and Networking (2013), 28--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Marco Di Felice, Angelo Trotta, Luca Bedogni, Luciano Bononi, Fabio Panzieri, Giuseppe Ruggeri, Valeria Loscri, and Pasquale Pace . 2013 b. STEM-mesh: Self-organizing mobile cognitive radio network for disaster recovery operations. Proceedings of the 9th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (2013), 602--608.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Marco Di Felice, Angelo Trotta, Luca Bedogni, Kaushik Roy Chowdhury, and Luciano Bononi . 2014. Self-organizing aerial mesh networks for emergency communication. Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communication (2014), 1631--1636.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Ting He, Kang-Won Lee, and Ananthram Swami . 2010. Flying in the dark: Controlling autonomous data ferries with partial observations. Proceedings of the 11th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (2010), 141--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Theus Hossmann, Franck Legendre, Paolo Carta, Per Gunningberg, and Christian Rohner . 2011. Twitter in Disaster Mode: Opportunistic Communication and Distribution of Sensor Data in Emergencies. (2011), 1:1--1:6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Fabian Kuhn and Rotem Oshman . 2011. Dynamic networks: models and algorithms. ACM SIGACT News Vol. 42, 1 (2011), 82--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Quang Minh, Kien Nguyen, Cristian Borcea, and Shigeki Yamada . 2014. On-the-fly establishment of multihop wireless access networks for disaster recovery. IEEE Communications Magazine Vol. 52, 10 (2014), 60--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Rahul C. Shah, Sumit Roy, Sushant Jain, and Waylon Brunette . 2003. Data MULEs: modeling and analysis of a three-tier architecture for sparse sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks Vol. 1, 2 (2003), 215 -- 233.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Md Yusuf Sarwar Uddin, Hossein Ahmadi, Tarek Abdelzaher, and Robin Kravets . 2013. Intercontact routing for energy constrained disaster response networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing Vol. 12, 10 (2013), 1986--1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Ying Zhu, Bin Xu, Xinghua Shi, and Yu Wang . 2013. A survey of social-based routing in delay tolerant networks: Positive and negative social effects. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials Vol. 15, 1 (2013), 387--401.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Brief Announcement: Communication in Systems of Home Based Mobile Agents

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SPAA '18: Proceedings of the 30th on Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures
            July 2018
            437 pages
            ISBN:9781450357999
            DOI:10.1145/3210377

            Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 11 July 2018

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • announcement

            Acceptance Rates

            SPAA '18 Paper Acceptance Rate36of120submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate447of1,461submissions,31%

            Upcoming Conference

            SPAA '24
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader