Netta Iivari
ABSTRACT
Inviting children to adopt a Protagonist role regarding technology has recently become advocated. Such a role embraces the original political participatory design (PD) agenda and aims at empowerment of children through design and making. However, so far the literature is limited in exploring the adoption of this role by children. While studies have reported experiences of engaging children in design and making activities, in-depth inquiries on children's experiences and challenges involved are lacking. We also maintain that the PD community has so far neglected education of children - in participation, design and technology - as our task and duty. This study reports findings from a design and making project aiming at empowerment of children, carried out in school context. We show that adopting the Protagonist role is not easy and there is a lot of variety between children. We present children's experiences and reflect on the challenges involved in progressing towards Protagonist role adoption.
- G. Bjerknes and T. Bratteteig. 1995. User Participation and Democracy. A Discussion of Scandinavian Research on System Development. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 7, 1, 73--98. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- J. Greenbaum and M. Kyng (Eds.). 1991. Design at Work. Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Schuler and A. Namioka (Eds.). 1993. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Simonsen and T. Robertson (Eds.). 2013. Routledge international handbook of participatory design. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
- P. Blikstein. 2013. Digital fabrication and 'making' in education: The democratization of invention. In FabLabs: Of machines, makers and inventors J. Walter-Herrmann and C. Buching (Eds.), 1--21.Google Scholar
- T. Bratteteig and I. Wagner. 2014. Design decisions and the sharing of power in PD. In Proceedings of the 13<sup>th</sup> Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium papers, and Keynote abstracts-Volume 2. ACM, New York, 29--32. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Björgvinsson, P. Ehn, and P.A. Hillgren. 2010. Participatory Design and Democratizing Innovation. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (PDC'10). ACM, New York, 41--50. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. DiSalvo, A. Clement and V. Pipek. 2013. Participatory design for, with, and by communities. In Routledge international handbook of participatory design. Routledge J. Simonsen and T. Robertson (Eds.), Routledge, New York, 182--209.Google Scholar
- A. Druin. 2002. The Role of Children in the Design of New Technology. Behaviour and Information Technology 21, 1, 1--25.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Bardzell. 2014. Utopias of participation: design, criticality, and emancipation. In Proceedings of the 13<sup>th</sup> Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium papers, and Keynote abstracts-Volume 2. ACM, New York, 189--190. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Bossen, C. Dindler and O. S. Iversen. 2016. Evaluation in participatory design: a literature survey. In Proceedings of the 14<sup>th</sup> Participatory Design Conference: Full papers-Volume 1. ACM, New York, 151--160. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. P. Correia and F. D. Yusop. 2008. I don't want to be empowered: the challenge of involving real-world clients in instructional design experiences. In Proceedings of the 10<sup>th</sup> Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design (PDC'08). Indiana University, Indianapolis, 214--216. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Ertner, A. M. Kragelund and L. Malmborg. 2010. Five enunciations of empowerment in participatory design. In Proceedings of the 11<sup>th</sup> Biennial Participatory Design Conference. ACM, New York, 191--194. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. L. Kaiying and S. Lindtner. 2016. Legitimacy, boundary objects & participation in transnational DIY biology. In Proceedings of the 14<sup>th</sup> Participatory Design Conference: Full papers-Volume 1. ACM, New York, 171--180. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Kinnula, N. Iivari, T. Molin-Juustila, E. Keskitalo, T. Leinonen, E. Mansikkamäki, T. Käkelä, and M. Similä. 2017. Cooperation, Combat, or Competence Building - What Do We Mean When We Are 'Empowering Children' in and through Digital Technology Design? In Proceedings of the Thirty eighth International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS'17). AIS.Google Scholar
- A. Balanskat and K. Engelhardt. 2014. Computing Our Future: Computer Programming and Coding-Priorities, School Curricula and Initiatives Across Europe. Technical report, European SchoolNet, Brussels.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. 2011. Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. National Academies Press, Washington.Google Scholar
- M. Pérez-Sanagustín, M. Nussbaum, I. Hilliger, C. Alario-Hoyos, R. Heller, P. Twining and C. Tsai. 2017. Research on ICT in K-12 schools-A review of experimental and survey-based studies in computers & education 2011 to 2015. Computer & Education 104, C, A1--A15.Google Scholar
- M. Kinnula, S. Laari-Salmela, and N. Iivari. 2015. Mundane or Magical? Discourses on Technology Adoption in Finnish Schools. In Proceedings of the 23<sup>rd</sup> European Conference of Information Systems (ECIS). AIS, Paper 102.Google Scholar
- L. Kuure, T. Molin-Juustila, T. Keisanen, M. Riekki, N. Iivari and M. Kinnula. 2016. Switching perspectives: from a language teacher to a designer of language learning with new technologies. Computer Assisted Language Learning 29, 5, 925--941.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. C. Smith, O. S. Iversen and R. Veerasawmy. 2017. Impediments to Digital Fabrication in Education. In Information and Technology Literacy: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 301--319. IGI Global, Hershey.Google Scholar
- J. Tondeur, J. van Braak, F. Siddiq and R. Scherer. 2016. Time for a new approach to prepare future teachers for educational technology use: Its meaning and measurement. Computers & Education, 94, 134--150. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Bekker, S. Bakker, I. Douma, J. van der Poel, and K. Scheltenaar. 2015. Teaching children digital literacy through design-based learning with digital toolkits in schools. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 5, 29--38. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. S. Katterfeldt, N. Dittert, and H. Schelhowe. 2015. Designing digital fabrication learning environments for Bildung: Implications from ten years of physical computing workshops. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 5, 3--10. Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. C. Smith, O. S. Iversen, and M. Hjorth. 2015. Design thinking for digital fabrication in education. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 5, 20--28. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Kyng. 1988. Designing for a dollar a day. Office Technology and People, 4, 2, 157--170.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Bødker. 1996. Creating conditions for participation: conflicts and resources in systems development. Human-computer interaction 11, 3, 215--236. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Nygaard and O. Terje Bergo. 1975. The trade unions - New users of research. Personnel review 4, 2, 5--10.Google Scholar
- D. Dougherty. 2012. The maker movement. innovations 7, 3, 11--14.Google Scholar
- C. Frauenberger, J. Good and W. Keay-Bright. 2010. Phenomenology, a framework for participatory design. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference. ACM, New York, 187--190. Google ScholarDigital Library
- U. Kokil and J. Jeanne. 2008. Designing wearable educational games for children. In Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design. Indiana University, Indianapolis, 320--321. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Kuure, E. Halkola, N. Iivari, M. Kinnula, and T. Molin-Juustila. 2010. Children Imitate! The issue of recycling in participatory design with children. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (PDC '10). ACM, New York, 131--140. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Lindberg, M. Thomsen and M. Åkesson. 2014. Ethics in health promoting PD: designing digital peer support with children cured from cancer. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers-Volume 1. ACM, New York, 91--100. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Makhaeva, C. Frauenberger and K. Spiel. 2016. Creating creative spaces for co-designing with autistic children: the concept of a Handlungsspielraum. In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full papers-Volume 1. ACM, New York, 51--60. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. van Rijn and P. Stappers. 2008. Expressions of ownership: motivating users in a co-design process. In Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design. Indiana University, Indianapolis, 178--181. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Weiss, D. Wurhofer, R. Bernhaupt, E. Beck and M. Tscheligi. 2008. This is a flying shopping trolley: a case study of participatory design with children in a shopping context. In Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design. Indiana University, Indianapolis, 254--257. Google ScholarDigital Library
- O. S. Iversen and C. Dindler. 2013. A Utopian agenda in child-computer interaction. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 1, 1, 24--29.Google ScholarCross Ref
- O. Iversen and R. Smith. 2012. Scandinavian participatory design: dialogic curation with teenagers. In Proceedings of Interaction Design and Children conference. ACM, New York, 106--115. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. Barendregt, T. M. Bekker, P. Börjesson, E. Eriksson and O. Torgersson. 2016. Legitimate Participation in the Classroom Context: Adding Learning Goals to Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. ACM, New York, 167--174. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Iivari and M. Kinnula. 2016. Inclusive or Inflexible - a Critical Analysis of the School Context in Supporting Children's Genuine Participation. In Proceedings of the 9<sup>th</sup> Nordic Conference of Human Computer Interaction. ACM, New York, 63. Google ScholarDigital Library
- O. S. Iversen, R. C. Smith, and C. Dindler. 2017. Child as Protagonist: Expanding the Role of Children in Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC'17). ACM, New York, 27--37. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Toombs, S. Bardzell and J. Bardzell. 2014. Becoming makers: Hackerspace member habits, values, and identities. Journal of Peer Production, 5, 1--8.Google Scholar
- S. Lindtner, G. D. Hertz and P. Dourish. 2014. Emerging sites of HCI innovation: hackerspaces, hardware startups & incubators. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 439--448. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Kolko, A. Hope, B. Sattler, K. MacCorkle and B. Sirjani. 2012. Hackademia: building functional rather than accredited engineers. In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers-Volume 1. ACM, New York, 129--138. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Hatch. 2014. The Maker Movement Manifesto. McGraw-Hill Education, New York.Google Scholar
- J. Löwgren. 1995. Applying design methodology to software development. In Proceedings of Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, & techniques, ACM, New York, 87--95. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Löwgren and E. Stolterman. 1999. Methods & tools: design methodology and design practice. interactions 6, 1, 13--20. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Gourlet and F. Decortis. 2016. Inscribing the conditions for a Designerly Learning in Elementary Classrooms: Building a Frame to Open a World of Possibilities. In Proceedings of FabLearn Europe, 1--9.Google Scholar
- A. Clement. 1996. Computing at Work: Empowering Action by Low-Level Users. In Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices R. Kling (Ed). Morgan Kauffmann, San Diego, 383--406. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Grimme, J. Bardzell and S. Bardzell. 2014). We've conquered dark: shedding light on empowerment in critical making. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational. ACM, New York, 431--440. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Lindtner, S. Bardzell and J. Bardzell. 2016. Reconstituting the utopian vision of making: HCI after technosolutionism. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 1390--1402. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Yarosh, I. Radu, S. Hunter, and E. Rosenbaum. 2011. Examining values: an analysis of nine years of IDC research. In Proceedings of Interaction Design and Children conference (IDC'11). ACM, New York, 136--144. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. P. Hourcade. 2008. Interaction Design and Children. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction 1, 4, 277--392. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Iivari, M. Kinnula, and L. Kuure. 2015. With Best Intentions - a Foucauldian Examination on Children's Genuine Participation in ICT Design. Information Technology and People 28, 2, 246--280.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Iivari, T. Molin-Juustila and M. Kinnula. 2016. The Future Digital Innovators: Empowering the Young Generation with Digital Fabrication and Making. In International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS'16). AIS.Google Scholar
- D. A. Durães. 2015. Gaming and Robotics to Transforming Learning. In Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning T. Di Mascio, R. Gennari, P. Vittorini and F. De la Prieta (Eds.). Springer, Cham, 51--56.Google Scholar
- E. L. Pucci and I. Mulder. 2015. Star(t) to Shine: Unlocking Hidden Talents Through Sharing and Making. In Proceedings of Distributed, Ambient, and Pervasive Interactions (DAPI 2015), Springer, Cham, 85--96. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. L. Chu, F. Quek, S. Bhangaonkar, A.B. Ging, and K. Sridharamurthy. 2015. Making the maker: a means-to-an-ends approach to nurturing the maker mindset in elementary-aged children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 5, 11--19. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. L. Chu, R. Schlegel, F. Quek, A. Christy and K. Chen. 2017. 'I Make, Therefore I Am': The Effects of Curriculum-Aligned Making on Children's Self-Identity. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 109--120. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Jacucci and I. Wagner. 2007. Performative roles of materiality for collective creativity. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI conference on Creativity & Cognition, ACM, New York, 73--82. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Kinnula, T. Molin-Juustila, I. Sanchez Milara, M. Cortes, and J. Riekki. 2017. What if It Switched on the Sun? Exploring creativity in a brainstorming session with children through a Vygotskyan perspective. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 26, 4, 423--452. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Hardy and S. Leiba-O'Sullivan. 1998. The Power Behind Empowerment: Implications for Research and Practice. Human relations 51, 4, 451--483.Google Scholar
- L. Chawla and H. Heft. 2002. Children's competence and the ecology of communities: a functional approach to the evaluation of participation. Journal of environmental psychology 22, 1--2, 201--216.Google ScholarCross Ref
- X. Lin, C. Hmelo, C. K. Kinzer and T. J. Secules. 1999. Designing technology to support reflection. Educational Technology Research and Development 47, 3, 43--62.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. A. Schön. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
- P. Gourlet, L. Eveillard and F. Dervieux. 2016. The Research Diary, Supporting Pupils' Reflective Thinking during Design Activities. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. ACM, New York, 206--217. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Empowering children through design and making: towards protagonist role adoption
Recommendations
Empowered to Make a Change: Guidelines for Empowering the Young Generation in and through Digital Technology Design
FabLearn Europe '19: Proceedings of the FabLearn Europe 2019 ConferenceThis paper scrutinizes how children can be empowered to make a change through acquiring skills in digital technology design. We propose a framework that integrates theoretical understanding from literature on nexus analysis, values, and value as well as ...
Children with ADHD and their Care Ecosystem: Designing Beyond Symptoms
CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsDesigning for children with ADHD has been of increasing interest to the HCI community. However, current approaches do not adequately involve all relevant stakeholders, and primarily focus on addressing symptoms, following a medical model of disability ...
Embedded assumptions in design and Making projects with children
OzCHI '20: Proceedings of the 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer InteractionPrevious literature highlights the importance of teaching children design and Making skills. However, there are fundamental differences in projects engaging children in design and Making, concerning the objects and motives of design. They vary depending ...
Comments