Madisson Whitman
ABSTRACT
Ubiquitous networked data collection and algorithm-based information systems have the potential to disparately impact lives around the planet and pose a host of emerging ethical challenges. One response has been a call for more transparency and democratic control over the design and implementation of such systems. This scoping mapping review focuses on participatory approaches to the design, governance, and future of these systems across a wide variety of contexts and domains.1
- Julia Angwin, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu, and Lauren Kirchner. 2016. Machine Bias. (May 2016). https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencingGoogle Scholar
- Eric PS Baumer. 2017. Toward Human-Centered Algorithm Design. Big Data and Society 4, 2 (2017).Google Scholar
- Eric PS Baumer, Xiaotong Xu, Christine Chu, Shion Guha, and Geri Gay. 2017. When Subjects Interpret the Data: Social Media Non-Use as a Case for Adapting the Delphi Method to CSCW. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). 1527-- 1543. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sander Bogers, Joep Frens, Janne van Kollenburg, Eva Deckers, and Caroline Hummels. 2016. Connected Baby Bottle: A Design Case Study Towards a Framework for Data-Enabled Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 301--311. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anne Bowser, Katie Shilton, Jenny Preece, and Elizabeth Warrick. 2017. Accounting for Privacy in Citizen Science: Ethical Research in a Context of Openness. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 2124--2136. Google ScholarDigital Library
- danah boyd, Karen Levy, and Alice Marwick. 2014. The Networked Nature of Algorithmic Discrimination. (2014).Google Scholar
- Rosi Braidotti. 2013. The Posthuman. Polity.Google Scholar
- Eva Brandt, Thomas Binder, and Elizabeth B-N Sanders. 2013. Tools and Techniques: Ways to Engage Telling, Making and Enacting. In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, Jesper Simonsen and Toni Robertson (Eds.). Routledge, 145--181.Google Scholar
- Robert Brauneis and Ellen P Goodman. 2017. Algorithmic Transparency for the Smart City. Yale Journal of Law and Technology (2017).Google Scholar
- Sarah Brayne. 2017. Big Data Surveillance: The Case of Policing. American Sociological Review 82, 5 (2017), 977--1008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Simone Browne. 2015. Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Duke University Press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alex Campolo, Madelyn Sanfilippo, Meredith Whittaker, and Kate Crawford. 2017. AI Now 2017 Report. (2017).Google Scholar
- Diana Coole and Samantha Frost. 2010. New Materialisms. In Introducing the New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Duke University Press, 1--43.Google Scholar
- Kate Crawford. 2016. Can an Algorithm Be Agonistic? Ten Scenes From Life in Calculated Publics. Science, Technology, and Human Values 41, 1 (2016), 77--92.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Karen Day, Gayl Humphrey, and Sophie Cockcroft. 2017. How Do the Design Features of Health Hackathons Contribute to Participatory Medicine. Australasian Journal of Information Systems 21, 1--20 (2017).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Carl DiSalvo. 2009. Design and the Construction of Publics. Design Issues 25, 1 (2009), 48--63.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Carl DiSalvo, Tom Jenkins, and Thomas Lodato. 2016. Designing Speculative Civics. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). 4979--4990. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pelle Ehn. 1993. Scandinavian Design: On Participation and Skill. In Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, Douglas Schuler and Aki Namioka (Eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
- Pelle Ehn, Elisabet M Nilsson, and Richard Topgaard. 2014. Making Futures: Marginal Notes on Innovation, Design, and Democracy. MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chris Elsden, Bettina Nissen, Andrew Garbett, David Chatting, David Kirk, and John Vines. 2016. Metadating: Exploring the Romance and Future of Personal Data. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). 685--698. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hossein Estiri, Terri Lovins, Nader Afzalan, and Kari A Stephens. 2016. Applying a Participatory Design Approach to Define Objective and Properties of a "Data Profiling" Tool for Electronic Health Data. In AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science Proceedings. 60--67.Google Scholar
- Virginia Eubanks. 2018. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St. Martin's Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andrew Guthrie Ferguson. 2017. The Rise of Big Data Policing: Surveillance, Race, and the Future of Law Enforcement. NYU Press.Google Scholar
- The IEEE Global Initiative for Ethical Considerations in Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems. 2016. Ethically Aligned Design. (2016).Google Scholar
- Tarleton Gillespie. 2010. The Politics of 'Platforms'. New Media and Society 12, 3 (2010), 347--364.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tarleton Gillespie. 2014. The Relevance of Algorithms. In Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and ociety, Tarleton Gillespie, Pablo Boczkowski, and Kirsten Foot (Eds.). MIT Press, 167--194.Google Scholar
- Tarleton Gillespie. 2016. Algorithm. In Digital Keywords: A Vocabulary of Information Society and Culture, Benjamin Peters (Ed.). Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Wendy Gunn, Ton Otto, and Rachel Charlotte Smith (Eds.). 2013. Design Anthropology: Theory and Practice. Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
- Peter Hall, Claude Heath, Lizzie Coles-Kemp, and Axel Tanner. 2015. Examining the Contribution of Critical Visualisation to Information Security. In Proceedings of the 2015 New Security Paradigms Workshop. 59--72. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tim Ingold. 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. Routledge.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lauren Kirchner. 2017. New York City Moves to Create Accountability for Algorithms. (December 2017). https://www.propublica.org/article/ new-york-city-moves-to-create-accountability-for-algorithmsGoogle Scholar
- Rob Kitchin. 2017. Thinking Critically About and Researching Algorithms. Information, Communication and Society 20, 1 (2017), 14--29.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rob Kitchin and Tracey P. Lauriault. 2014. Towards Critical Data Studies: Charting and Unpacking Data Assemblages and Their Work. Geoweb and Big Data (2014), 1--19.Google Scholar
- Johannes Landstorfer, Ivo Hermann, Jan-Erik Stange, Marian Dörk, and Reto Wettach. 2014. Weaving a Carpet from Log Entries: A Network Security Visualization Built with Co-Creation. In 2014 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology. 73--82.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ann Light. 2015. Troubling Futures: Can Participatory Design Research Provide a Generative Anhropology for the 21st Century? Interaction Design and Architecture 26, 81--94 (2015).Google Scholar
- Shixia Liu, Xiting Wang, Jianfei Chen, Jim Zhu, and Baining Guo. 2014. TopicPanorama: A Full Picture of Relevant Topics. In 2014 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, 183--192 (Ed.).Google Scholar
- Justin Longo, Evan Kuras, Holly Smith, David M Hondula, and Erik Johnston. 2017. Technology Use, Exposure to Natural Hazards, and Being Digitally Invisible: Implications for Policy Analytics. Policy and Internet 9, 1 (2017), 76--108.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brent Daniel Mittelstadt, Patrick Allo, Mariarosaria Taddeo, Sandra Wachter, and Luciano Floridi. 2016. The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate. Big Data and Society 3, 2 (2016).Google Scholar
- Safiya Umoja Noble. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. NYU Press.Google Scholar
- Ethics of Big Data: Introduction. 2016. Nerurkar, Michael and Wadephuland, Christian and Wiegerling, Klaus. International Review of Information Ethics 24 (2016), 2--4.Google Scholar
- Cathy O'Neil. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Glenn Parsons. 2015. The Philosophy of Design. John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
- Ulrike Passe, Nadia Anderson, Kris de Brabanter, Michael C Dorneich, and Caroline Krejci. 2016. Methodologies for Studying Human-Microclimate Interactions for Resilient, Smart City Decision-Making. Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering Conference Proceedings and Posters 21 (2016).Google Scholar
- Toni Robertson and Jesper Simonsen. 2013. Participatory Design: An Introduction. In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, Jesper Simonsen and Toni Robertson (Eds.). Routledge, 1--17.Google Scholar
- Søren Rosenbak and Henrike Feckenstedt. 2016. The Design of Digital Shadows: Co-Speculating Presents That Might Have Already Come True. In MEDIATIONS Conference Proceedings: Art and Design Agency and Participation in Public Space. 13--25.Google Scholar
- Nick Seaver. 2017. Algorithms as Culture: Some Tactices for the Ethnography of Algorithmic Systems. Big Data and Society (2017), 1--12.Google Scholar
- Katie Shilton. 2013. Values Levers: Building Ethics Into Design. Science, Technology, and Human Values 38, 3 (2013), 374--397.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Katie Shilton, Jes A Koepfler, and Kenneth R Fleischmann. 2013. Charting Sociotechnical Dimensions of Values for Design Research. The Information Society 29, 5 (2013), 259--271. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rachel Charlotte Smith, Kasper Tang Vangkilde, Mette Gisley Kjaersgaard, Ton Otto, Joachim Halse, and Thomas Binder (Eds.). 2016. Design Anthropological Futures. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
- Latanya Sweeney. 2013. Discrimination in Online Ad Delivery. Queue 11, 3 (2013), 10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Peter Tolmie, Rob Procter, David William Randall, Mark Rouncefield, Christian Burger, Geraldine Wong Sak Hoi, Arkaitz Zubiaga, and Maria Liakata. 2017. Supporting the Use of User Generated Content in Journalistic Practice. CHI 2017 (2017). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Traoré and Christophe Hurter. 2017. Interactive Exploration of 3D Scanned Baggage. In IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Vol. 31. 1.Google Scholar
- Zeynep Tufekci. 13. Algorithmic Harms Beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent Challenges of Computational Agency. Colorado Technology Law Journal 2, 203218 (13).Google Scholar
- European Union. 2018. The EU General Data Protection Regulation. (2018). https://www.eugdpr.org/the-regulation.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Bert Vandenberghe and Karin Slegers. 2016. Anthropomorphism as a Strategy to Engage End-Users in Health Data Ideation. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 1--4. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nervo Verdezoto and Erik Grönvall. 2016. On Preventive Blood Pressure SelfMonitoring at Home. Cognition, Technology and Work 18, 2 (2016), 267--286. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Amy Voida, Ellie Harmon, Willa Weller, Aubrey Thornsbury, Ariana Casale, Samuel Vance, Forrest Adams, Zach Hoffman, Alex Schmidt, Kevin Grimley, Luke Cox, Aubrey Neeley, and Christopher Goodyear. 2017. Competing Currencies: Designing for Politics in Units of Measurement. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). 847--860. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lu Xiao, Yan Luo, and Steven High. 2013. CKM: A Shared Visual Analytical Tool for Large-Scale Analysis of Audio-Video Interviews. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Big Data. 104--112.Google Scholar
- Qian Yang, John Zimmerman, Aaron Steinfeld, Lisa Carey, and James F Antaki. 2016. Investigating the Heart Pump Implant Decision Process: Opportunities for Decision Support Tools to Help. In ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 4477--4488. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Malte Ziewitz. 2016. Governing Algorithms: Myth, Mess, and Methods. Science, Technology, and Human Values 41, 1 (2016), 3--16.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Potential for participatory big data ethics and algorithm design: a scoping mapping review
Recommendations
Creative Entrances to Co-Design: Exploring Collaboration through Fiction, Fairy tales, and Games
PDC '22: Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2022 - Volume 2Design fiction, storytelling, and games provide creative entrances to co-design activities with different groups. These have emerged from a need to develop joint perspectives, a joint language and technological imagination as prerequisites for ...
The role of design fiction in participatory design processes
NordiCHI '18: Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer InteractionParticipatory design is in essence very malleable as any design technique could lend itself to it, as long as users and stakeholders are involved. Design fictions however, have more often been used as either a vehicle for critical designs, or as a sheer ...
Participatory design fiction for innovation in everyday wearable IoT systems: demo abstract
IoTDI '19: Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet of Things Design and ImplementationThis demo will invite attendees to experience a novel technique of Participatory Design Fiction, which uses storytelling to elicit users' ideas for new kinds of wearable IoT devices, starting from a blank slate. The demo will also feature the Gallery ...
Comments