skip to main content
10.1145/3214745.3214795acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
invited-talk

Confocal non-line-of-sight imaging

Published:12 August 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Non-line-of-sight (NLOS) imaging aims at recovering the shape of objects hidden outside the direct line of sight of a camera. In this work, we report on a new approach for acquiring time-resolved measurements that are suitable for NLOS imaging. The system uses a confocalized single-photon detector and pulsed laser. As opposed to previously-proposed NLOS imaging systems, our setup is very similar to LIDAR systems used for autonomous vehicles and it facilitates a closed-form solution of the associated inverse problem, which we derive in this work. This algorithm, dubbed the Light Cone Transform, is three orders of magnitude faster and more memory efficient than existing methods. We demonstrate experimental results for indoor and outdoor scenes captured and reconstructed with the proposed confocal NLOS imaging system.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

01-329-otoole.mp4

mp4

211.6 MB

References

  1. Mauro Buttafava, Jessica Zeman, Alberto Tosi, Kevin Eliceiri, and Andreas Velten. 2015. Non-line-of-sight imaging using a time-gated single photon avalanche diode. Opt. Express 23, 16 (2015), 20997--21011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Otkrist Gupta, Thomas Willwacher, Andreas Velten, Ashok Veeraraghavan, and Ramesh Raskar. 2012. Reconstruction of hidden 3D shapes using diffuse reflections. Opt. Express 20, 17 (2012), 19096--19108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Felix Heide, Lei Xiao, Wolfgang Heidrich, and Matthias B. Hullin. 2014. Diffuse mirrors: 3D reconstruction from diffuse indirect illumination using inexpensive time-of-flight sensors. Proc. CVPR (2014), 3222--3229. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ahmed Kirmani, Tylor Hutchison, James Davis, and Ramesh Raskar. 2009. Looking around the corner using transient imaging. Proc. ICCV (2009), 159--166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Matthew O'Toole, Felix Heide, David B. Lindell, Kai Zang, Steven Diamond, and Gordon Wetzstein. 2017. Reconstructing transient images from single-photon sensors. Proc. CVPR (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Matthew O'Toole, David B. Lindell, and Gordon Wetzstein. 2018. Confocal non-line-of-sight imaging based on the light-cone transform. Nature 555 (2018), 338--341.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Andreas Velten, Thomas Willwacher, Otkrist Gupta, Ashok Veeraraghavan, Moungi G. Bawendi, and Ramesh Raskar. 2012. Recovering three-dimensional shape around a corner using ultrafast time-of-flight imaging. Nature Communications 3 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Di Wu, Gordon Wetzstein, Christopher Barsi, Thomas Willwacher, Matthew O'Toole, Nikhil Naik, Qionghai Dai, Kyros Kutulakos, and Ramesh Raskar. 2012. Frequency analysis of transient light transport with applications in bare sensor imaging. Proc. ECCV (2012), 542--555. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Confocal non-line-of-sight imaging

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGGRAPH '18: ACM SIGGRAPH 2018 Talks
        August 2018
        158 pages
        ISBN:9781450358200
        DOI:10.1145/3214745

        Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 August 2018

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • invited-talk

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

        Upcoming Conference

        SIGGRAPH '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader