skip to main content
10.1145/3217804.3217922acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessmsocietyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Shouting at the Wall: Does Negativity Drive Ideological Cross-posting in Brexit Facebook Comments?

Published:18 July 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Using a novel methodological approach to measure emotions in Facebook comments, this Work in Progress (WIP) paper explores the relationship between negative feelings and ideological cross-posting behavior. Using the VoxPopuli data harvester, we collect over 770,000 public Facebook comments1 from the three major political campaign pages active during the Brexit referendum. After sorting users into ideological camps based on their reactions to campaign posts, we then examine their commenting patterns across ideological lines. Using three different methods of sentiment analysis, we identify negative and positive emotions and their fine-grained sub-categories in comments. The analysis reveals one quarter of all comments are cross-ideological posts, with Leave supporters overwhelmingly active in commenting on Remain posts. A comparison across the campaigns shows that Brexiteers are much more likely to express anger than Remainers.

References

  1. Zizi Papacharissi. 2015. Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Cass Sunstein. 2017. #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Eytan Bakshy, Solomon Messing, and Lada Adamic. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 348, 6239 (June 2015), 1130--1132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Anatoliy Gruzd and Jeffrey Roy. 2014. Investigating Political Polarization on Twitter: A Canadian perspective. Policy & Internet 6, 1 (March 2014), 28--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. David Ost. 2004. Politics as the Mobilization of Anger: Emotions in Movements and in Power. European Journal of Social Theory 7, 2 (May 2014), 229--244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Jeff Goodwin, James M. Jasper, and Francesca Polletta (Eds.). 2009. Passionate Politics: Emotions and Social Movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Homero Gil de Zúñiga, Logan Molyneux, and Pei Zheng. 2014. Social Media, Political Expression, and Political Participation. Journal of Communication 64, 4 (August 2014), 612--634.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Anamaria Dutceac Segesten and Michael Bossetta. 2017. A Typology of Political Participation Online: How Citizens used Twitter to Mobilize During the 2015 British General Elections. Information, Communication & Society 20, 11 (March 2017). 1625--1643.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Zeynep Tufekci. 2014. Big Questions for Social Media Big Data: Representativeness, Validity and Other Methodological Pitfalls. In Proceedings of the Eighth Int'l AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM '14), Ann Arbor, MI, 505--514.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Stefan Stieglitz and Linh Dang-Xuan. 2012. Political Communication and influence through Microblogging: An Empirical Analysis of Sentiment in Twitter Messages and Retweet Behavior. In Proceeding of the 45th Hawaii Int'l Conf. on System Science, Maui, 3500--3509. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Yunya Song, Xin-Yu Dai, and Jia Wang. 2016. Not all Emotions are Created Equal: Expressive Behavior of the Networked Public on China's Social Media Site. Computers in Human Behavior 60 (July 2016), 525--533. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jonah Berger and Katherine L. Milkman. 2012. What makes Online Content Viral?. Journal of Marketing Research 49, 2 (April 2012), 192--205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. James Russel. 1980. A Circumplex Model of Affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 6 (December1980): 1161--1178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Chris Zimmerman, Mari-Klara Stein, Daniel Hardt, Christian Danielsen, and Ravi Vatrapu. 2016. emotionVis: Designing an Emotion Text Inference Tool for Visual Analytics. In Int'l Conf. on Design Science Research in Information Systems, Canada, 238--244. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Sherlock Campbell and James W. Pennebaker. 2003. "The Secret Life of Pronouns: Flexibility in Writing Style and Physical Health. Psychological science 14, 1 (January 2003), 60--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Stefan Deborteli, Oliver Müller, Iris A. Junglas, and Jan vom Brocke. 2016. Text Mining for Information Systems Researchers: An Annotated Topic Modeling Tutorial. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 39 (July 2016), 111--135.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Shouting at the Wall: Does Negativity Drive Ideological Cross-posting in Brexit Facebook Comments?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SMSociety '18: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Media and Society
      July 2018
      405 pages
      ISBN:9781450363341
      DOI:10.1145/3217804

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 July 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate78of189submissions,41%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader