skip to main content
10.1145/3219104.3219158acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespearcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Application Performance on the Newest Processors and GPUs

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 July 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper discusses the capabilities of the newest processors and GPUs to run a mixture of the most common chemistry applications. The baseline system for these comparisons is the 32-core Intel Broadwell processor which has been around for two years. Comparisons are made to the newer Intel Skylake and the AMD EPYC processors. The EPYC architecture has typically twice as many cores so one point of comparison is whether each code can effectively make use of the higher core count. These codes can be accelerated using GPUs with some taking advantage of 32-bit acceleration while others need good 64-bit performance. The consumer grade NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080Ti cards are used as the baseline for the GPU comparisons. Higher level NVIDIA Quadro GP100 and Titan V cards are evaluated using each code. All applications use CUDA to enable GPU acceleration. AMD provides tools in its HIP package that allow translation of C and C++ CUDA code into source code that can be compiled with either NVIDIA's NVCC or AMD's HCC compilers. This project also involves investigating the performance and ease of converting CUDA code to run on the AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition GPU card.

References

  1. Kansas State University Beocat cluster website, http://beocat.ksu.edu/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. H.J.C Berendsend, D. van der Spoel, R. van Drunen. 1995. GROMACS: A message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Computer Physics Communications 91, 1--3 (Sept. 1995), 43--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mark James Abraham, Teemu Murtola, Roland Schutz, Szilard Pall, Jeremy C. Smith, Berk Hess, Erik Linkahl. 2015. GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1--2, (Sept. 2015), 19--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. James C. Phillips, Rosemary Braun, Wei Wang, James Gumbart, Emad Tajkhorshid, Elizabeth Villa, Christophe Hipot, Robert D. Skeel, Laxmikant Kale, and Klaus Schulten. 2005. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. Journal of Computational Chemistry. 26 (2005) 1781--1802.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. G. Kresse and J. Hafner. 1993. Ab-initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Physical Review B, 47 (1993) 558.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. G. Kresse and J. Hafner. 1994. Ab-initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal-amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Physical Review B, 49 (1994) 14251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. G. Kresse and J. Furthmuller. 1996. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Computational Material Science, 6 (1996) 15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. G. Kresse and J. Furthmuller. 1996. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Physical Review B, 54 (1996) 11169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. C. Fonseca Guerra, J.G. Snijders, G. the Velde and E.J. Baerends. 1998. Towards an order-N DFT method. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, 99 (1998) 391.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. C. Fonseca Guerra, J.G. Snijders, G. the Velde and E.J. Baerends. 1998. Towards an order-N DFT method. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, 99 (1998) 391.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. ADF2017, SCM, Theoretical Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, http://www.scm.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Application Performance on the Newest Processors and GPUs

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      PEARC '18: Proceedings of the Practice and Experience on Advanced Research Computing
      July 2018
      652 pages
      ISBN:9781450364461
      DOI:10.1145/3219104

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 July 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      PEARC '18 Paper Acceptance Rate79of123submissions,64%Overall Acceptance Rate133of202submissions,66%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader