skip to main content
10.1145/3220547.3220548acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Learning Financial Networks using Quantile Granger Causality

Published:15 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the post-crisis era, financial regulators and policymakers require data-driven tools to quantify systemic risk and to identify systemically important firms. We propose a statistical method that measures connectivity in the financial sector using time series of firms' stock returns. Our method is based on system-wide lower-tail analysis, whereby we estimate linkages between firms that occur when those firms are distressed and that exist conditional on the financial information of all other firms in the sample. This is achieved using Lasso-penalized quantile vector autoregression. By considering centrality measures of the estimated networks, we can assess the build-up of systemic risk and identify risk propagation channels. We apply our method to monthly returns of large U.S. firms, demonstrating that we are able to detect many of the most recent systemic events, in addition to identifying key players in the 2007-2009 U.S. financial crisis. Importantly, these players are not identified using standard Granger causality, which estimates connectivity by averaging across good, bad, and normal days of the market.

References

  1. T. Adrian and M. K. Brunnermeier. Covar. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. Basu, S. Das, G. Michailidis, and A. K. Purnanandam. A system-wide approach to measure connectivity in the financial sector. Available at SSRN 2816137.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Billio, M. Getmansky, A. W. Lo, and L. Pelizzon. Econometric measures of connectedness and systemic risk in the finance and insurance sectors. Journal of Financial Economies, 104(3):535--559, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. S. R. Das. Matrix metrics: Network-based systemic risk scoring. The Journal of Alternative Investments, 18(4):33--51, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. The Financial Crisis Inquiry Report. Final Report of the National Commission on the Causes of the Financial and Economic Crisis in the United States, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. R. Koenker, I. Mizera, et al. Convex optimization in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 60(5):1--23, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. R. Tibshirani. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 58(1):267--288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. Learning Financial Networks using Quantile Granger Causality

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DSMM'18: Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Data Science for Macro-Modeling with Financial and Economic Datasets
      June 2018
      66 pages
      ISBN:9781450358835
      DOI:10.1145/3220547

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 June 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • extended-abstract
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      DSMM'18 Paper Acceptance Rate14of17submissions,82%Overall Acceptance Rate32of64submissions,50%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader