Tim Mattson
- D. Abadi, Y. Ahmad, M. Balazinska, U. Çetintemel, M. Cherniack, J.-H. Hwang, W. Lindner, A. Maskey, A. Rasin, E. Ryvkina, N. Tatbul, Y. Xing, and S. Zdonik. 2005. The design of the Borealis stream processing engine. Proc. of the 2nd Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR'05), Asilomar, CA, January.Google Scholar
- Z. Abedjan, L. Golab, and F. Naumann. August 2015. Profiling relational data: a survey. The VLDB Journal, 24(4): 557-581. Google ScholarDigital Library
- ACM. 2015a. Announcement: Michael Stonebraker, Pioneer in Database Systems Architecture, Receives 2014 ACM Turing Award. http://amturing.acm.org/award_winners/stonebraker_1172121.cfm. Accessed February 5, 2018.Google Scholar
- ACM. March 2015b. Press Release: MIT's Stonebraker Brought Relational Database Systems from Concept to Commercial Success, Set the Research Agenda for the Multibillion-Dollar Database Field for Decades. http://sigmodrecord.org/publications/sigmodRecord/1503/pdfs/04_announcements_Stonebraker.pdf. Accessed February 5, 2018.Google Scholar
- ACM. 2016. A.M. Turing Award Citation and Biography. http://amturing.acm.org/award_winners/stonebraker_1172121.cfm. Accessed September 24, 2018.Google Scholar
- Y. Ahmad, B. Berg, U. Çetintemel, M. Humphrey, J. Hwang, A. Jhingran, A. Maskey, O. Papaemmanouil, A. Rasin, N. Tatbul, W. Xing, Y. Xing, and S. Zdonik. June 2005. Distributed operation in the Borealis Stream Processing Engine. Demonstration, ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD'05). Baltimore, MD. Best Demonstration Award. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. M. Astrahan, M.W. Blasgen, D. D. Chamberlin, K. P. Eswaran, J. N. Gray, P. P. Griffiths, W. F. King, R. A. Lorie, P. R. McJones, J. W. Mehl, G. R. Putzolu, I. L. Traiger, B. W. Wade, and V. Watson. 1976. System R: relational approach to database management. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1(2): 97-137. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Bailis, E. Gan, S. Madden, D. Narayanan, K. Rong, and S. Suri. 2017. Macrobase: Prioritizing attention in fast data. Proc. of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Management of Data. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Berkeley Software Distribution. n.d. In Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkeley_Software_Distribution. Last accessed March 1, 2018.Google Scholar
- G. Beskales, I.F. Ilyas, L. Golab, and A. Galiullin. 2013. On the relative trust between inconsistent data and inaccurate constraints. Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering, ICDE 2013, pp. 541-552. Australia. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. S. Blackford, J. Choi, A. Cleary, E. D'Azevedo, J. Demmel, I. Dhillon, J. Dongarra, S. Hammarling, G. Henry, A. Petitet, K. Stanley, D. Walker, R. C. Whaley. 2017. ScaLAPACK Users' Guide. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics http://netlib.org/scalapack/slug/index.html. Last accessed December 31, 2017.Google Scholar
- D. Bitton, D. J. DeWitt, and C. Turbyfill. 1983. Benchmarking database systems--a systematic approach. Computer Sciences Technical Report #526, University of Wisconsin. http://minds.wisconsin.edu/handle/1793/58490.Google Scholar
- P. A. Boncz, M. L. Kersten, and S. Manegold. December 2008. Breaking the memory wall in MonetDB. Communications of the ACM, 51(12): 77-85. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. L. Brodie. June 2015. Understanding data science: an emerging discipline for data-intensive discovery. In S. Cutt, editor, Getting Data Right: Tackling the Challenges of Big Data Volume and Variety. O'Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA.Google Scholar
- Brown University, Department of Computer Science. Fall 2002. Next generation stream-based applications. Conduit Magazine, 11(2). https://cs.brown.edu/about/conduit/conduit_v11n2.pdf. Last accessed May 14, 2018.Google Scholar
- BSD licenses. n.d. In Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses. Last accessed March 1, 2018.Google Scholar
- M. Cafarella and C. Ré. April 2018. The last decade of database research and its blindingly bright future. or Database Research: A love song. DAWN Project, Stanford University. http://dawn.cs.stanford.edu/2018/04/11/db-community/.Google Scholar
- M. J. Carey, D. J. DeWitt, M. J. Franklin, N. E Hall, M. L. McAuliffe, J. F. Naughton, D. T. Schuh, M. H. Solomon, C. K. Tan, O. G. Tsatalos, S. J. White, and M. J. Zwilling. 1994. Shoring up persistent applications. Proc. of the 1994 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data (SIGMOD '94), 383-394. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. J. Carey, D. J. Dewitt, M. J. Franklin, N. E. Hall, M. L. McAuliffe, J. F. Naughton, D. T. Schuh, M. H. Solomon, C. K. Tan, O. G. Tsatalos, S. J. White, and M. J. Zwilling. 1994. Shoring up persistent applications. In Proc. of the 1994 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '94), pp. 383-394. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. J. Carey, L. M. Haas, P. M. Schwarz, M. Arya, W. E. Cody, R. Fagin, M. Flickner, A. W. Luniewski, W. Niblack, and D. Petkovic. 1995. Towards heterogeneous multimedia information systems: The garlic approach. In Research Issues in Data Engineering, 1995: Distributed Object Management, Proceedings, pp. 124-131. IEEE. Google ScholarDigital Library
- CERN. http://home.cern/about/computing. Last accessed December 31, 2017.Google Scholar
- D. D. Chamberlin and R. F. Boyce. 1974. SEQUEL: A structured English query language. In Proc. of the 1974 ACM SIGFIDET (now SIGMOD) Workshop on Data Description, Access and Control (SIGFIDET '74), pp. 249-264. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. D. Chamberlin, M. M. Astrahan, K. P. Eswaran, P. P. Griffiths, R. A. Lorie, J. W. Mehl, P. Reisner, and B. W. Wade. 1976. SEQUEL 2: a unified approach to data definition, manipulation, and control. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 20(6): 560-575. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Chandrasekaran, O, Cooper, A. Deshpande, M.J. Franklin, J.M. Hellerstein, W. Hong, S. Krishnamurthy, S. Madden, V. Raman, F. Reiss, and M. Shah. 2003. TelegraphCQ: Continuous dataflow processing for an uncertain world. Proc. of the 2003 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '03), pp. 668-668. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Chen, D.J. DeWitt, F. Tian, and Y. Wang. 2000. NiagaraCQ: A scalable continuous query system for Internet databases. Proc. of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '00), pp. 379-390. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Cherniack, H. Balakrishnan, M. Balazinska, D. Carney, U. Çetintemel, Y. Xing, and S. Zdonik. 2003. Scalable distributed stream processing. Proc. of the First Biennial Conference on Innovative Database Systems (CIDR'03), Asilomar, CA, January.Google Scholar
- C. M. Christensen. 1997. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- X. Chu, I. F. Ilyas, and P. Papotti. 2013a. Holistic data cleaning: Putting violations into context. Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering, ICDE 2013, pp. 458-469. Australia. Google ScholarDigital Library
- X. Chu, I. F. Ilyas, and P. Papotti. 2013b. Discovering denial constraints. Proc. of the VLDB Endowment, PVLDB 6(13): 1498-1509. Google ScholarDigital Library
- X. Chu, J. Morcos, I. F. Ilyas, M. Ouzzani, P. Papotti, N. Tang, and Y. Ye. 2015. Katara: A data cleaning system powered by knowledge bases and crowdsourcing. In Proc. of the 2015 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '15), pp. 1247-1261. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. J. A. Cock, C. J. Fields, N. Goto, M. L. Heuer, and P. M. Rice. 2009. The Sanger FASTQ file format for sequences with quality scores, and the Solexa/Illumina FASTQ variants. Nucleic Acids Research 38.6: 1767-1771.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. F. Codd. June 1970. A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Communications of the ACM, 13(6): 377-387. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Collins. 2016. Thomson Reuters uses Tamr to deliver better connected content at a fraction of the time and cost of legacy approaches. Tamr blog, July 28. https://www.tamr.com/video/thomson-reuters-uses-tamr-deliver-better-connected-content-fraction-time-cost-legacy-approaches/. Last accessed January 24, 2018.Google Scholar
- G. Copeland and D. Maier. 1984. Making smalltalk a database system. Proc. of the 1984 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '84), pp. 316-325. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Cranor, T. Johnson, V. Shkapenyuk, and O. Spatscheck. 2003. Gigascope: A stream database for network applications. Proc. of the 2003 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '03), pp. 647-651. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Crotty, A. Galakatos, K. Dursun, T. Kraska, U. Cetintemel, and S. Zdonik. 2015. Tupleware: "Big Data, Big Analytics, Small Clusters." CIDR.Google Scholar
- M. Dallachiesa, A. Ebaid, A. Eldawi, A. Elmagarmid, I. F. Ilyas, M. Ouzzani, and N. Tang. 2013. NADEEF, a commodity data cleaning system. Proc. of the 2013 ACM SIGMOD Conference on Management of Data, pp. 541-552. New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Dasu and J. M. Loh. 2012. Statistical distortion: Consequences of data cleaning. PVLDB, 5(11): 1674-1683. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. J. Date and E. F. Codd. 1975. The relational and network approaches: Comparison of the application programming interfaces. In Proc. of the 1974 ACM SIGFIDET (now SIGMOD) Workshop on Data Description, Access and Control: Data Models: Data-Structure-Set Versus Relational (SIGFIDET '74), pp. 83-113. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. J. DeWitt. 1979a. Direct a multiprocessor organization for supporting relational database management systems. IEEE Transactions of Computers, 28(6), 395-406. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. J. DeWitt. 1979b. Query execution in DIRECT. In Proc. of the 1979 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '79), pp. 13-22. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. J. DeWitt, R. H. Gerber, G. Graefe, M. L. Heytens, K. B. Kumar, and M. Muralikrishna. 1986. GAMMA--a high performance dataflow database machine. Proc. of the 12th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB '86), W. W. Chu, G. Gardarin, S. Ohsuga, and Y. Kambayashi, editors, pp. 228-237. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. J. DeWitt, S. Ghandeharizadeh, D. A. Schneider, A. Bricker, H.-I. Hsiao, and R. Rasmussen. March 1990. The Gamma database machine project. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2(1): 44-62. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. DeWitt and J. Gray. June 1992. Parallel database systems: the future of high performance database systems. Communications of the ACM, 35(6): 85-98. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. J. DeWitt, A. Halverson, R. Nehme, S. Shankar, J. Aguilar-Saborit, A. Avanes, M. Flasza, and J. Gramling. 2013. Split query processing in polybase. Proc. of the 2013 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '13), pp. 1255-1266. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Diaconu, C. Freedman, E. Ismert, P-A. Larson, P. Mittal, R. Stonecipher, N. Verma, and M. Zwilling. 2013. Hekaton: SQL server's memory-optimized OLTP engine. In Proc. of the 2013 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '13), pp. 1243-1254. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. P. Eswaran, J. N. Gray, R. A. Lorie, and I. L. Traiger. November 1976. The notions of consistency and predicate locks in a database system. Communications of the ACM, 19(11): 624-633. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. Fan, J. Li, S. Ma, N. Tang, and W. Yu. April 2012. Towards certain fixes with editing rules and master data. The VLDB Journal, 21(2): 213-238. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Fogg. September 1982. Implementation of domain abstraction in the relational database system INGRES. Master of Science Report, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
- T. Flory, A. Robbin, and M. David. May 1988. Creating SIPP longitudinal analysis files using a relational database management system. CDE Working Paper No. 88-32, Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
- V. Gadepally, J. Kepner, W. Arcand, D. Bestor, B. Bergeron, C. Byun, L. Edwards, M. Hubbell, P. Michaleas, J. Mullen, A. Prout, A. Rosa, C. Yee, and A. Reuther. 2015. D4M: Bringing associative arrays to database engines. High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC). IEEE, 2015.Google ScholarCross Ref
- V. Gadepally, K. O'Brien, A. Dziedzic, A. Elmore, J. Kepner, S. Madden, T. Mattson, J. Rogers, Z. She, and M. Stonebraker. September 2017. BigDAWG Version 0.1. IEEE High Performance Extreme.Google Scholar
- J. Gantz and D. Reinsel. 2013. The Digital Universe in 2020: Big Data, Bigger Digital Shadows, and Biggest Growth in the Far East--United States, IDC, February.Google Scholar
- L. Gerhardt, C. H. Faham, and Y. Yao. 2015. Accelerating scientific analysis with SciDB. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 664(7).Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Grad. 2007. Oral history of Michael Stonebraker, Transcription. Recorded: August 23, 2007. Computer History Museum, Moultonborough, NH. http://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/access/text/2012/12/102635858-05-01-acc.pdf. Last accessed April 8, 2018.Google Scholar
- A. Guttman. 1984. R-trees: a dynamic index structure for spatial searching. In Proc. of the 1984 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '84), pp. 47-57. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. M. Haas, J. C. Freytag, G. M. Lohman, and H. Pirahesh. 1989. Extensible query processing in starburst. In Proc. of the 1989 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '89), pp. 377-388. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Halperin, V. Teixeira de Almeida, L. L. Choo, S. Chu, P. Koutris, D. Moritz, J. Ortiz, V. Ruamviboonsuk, J. Wang, A. Whitaker. 2014. Demonstration of the Myria big data management service. Proc. of the 2014 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '14), p. 881-884. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Haynes, A. Cheung, and M. Balazinska. 2016. PipeGen: Data pipe generator for hybrid analytics. Proc. of the Seventh ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing (SoCC '16), M. K. Aguilera, B. Cooper, and Y. Diao, editors, pp. 470-483. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. A. Hearst. 2009. Search user interfaces. Cambridge University Press, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. M. Hellerstein, J. F. Naughton, and A. Pfeffer. 1995. Generalized search trees for database systems. In Proc. of the 21th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB '95), pp. 562-573. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=645921.673145. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. M. Hellerstein, E. Koutsoupias, D. P. Miranker, C. H. Papadimitriou, V. Samoladas. 2002. On a model of indexability and its bounds for range queries, Journal of the ACM (JACM), 49.1: 35-55. Google ScholarDigital Library
- IBM. 1997. Special Issue on IBM's S/390 Parallel Sysplex Cluster. IBM Systems Journal, 36(2).Google Scholar
- S. Idreos, F. Groffen, N. Nes, S. Manegold, S. K. Mullender, and M. L. Kersten. 2012. MonetDB: two decades of research in column-oriented database architectures. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 35(1): 40-45.Google Scholar
- N. Jain, S. Mishra, A. Srinivasan, J. Gehrke, J. Widom, H. Balakrishnan, U. Çetintemel, M. Cherniack, R. Tibbetts, and S. Zdonik. 2008. Towards a streaming SQL standard. Proc. VLDB Endowment, pp. 1379-1390. August 1-2. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. E. W. Johnson, T. J. Pollard, L. Shen, L. H. Lehman, M. Feng, M. Ghassemi, B. E. Moody, P. Szolovits, L. A. G. Celi, and R. G. Mark. 2016. MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database. Scientific Data 3: 160035Google Scholar
- V. Josifovski, P. Schwarz, L. Haas, and E. Lin. 2002. Garlic: a new flavor of federated query processing for DB2. In Proc. of the 2002 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '02), pp. 524-532. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. W. Josten, C. Mohan, I. Narang, and J. Z. Teng. 1997. DB2's use of the coupling facility for data sharing. IBM Systems Journal, 36(2): 327-351. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Kandel, A. Paepcke, J. Hellerstein, and J. Heer. 2011. Wrangler: Interactive visual specification of data transformation scripts. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), pp. 3363-3372. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Katz. editor. June 1982. Special issue on design data management. IEEE Database Engineering Newsletter, 5(2).Google Scholar
- J. Kepner, V. Gadepally, D. Hutchison, H. Jensen, T. Mattson, S. Samsi, and A. Reuther. 2016. Associative array model of SQL, NoSQL, and NewSQL Databases. IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC) 2016, Waltham, MA, September 13-15.Google ScholarCross Ref
- V. Kevin and M. Whitney. 1974. Relational data management implementation techniques. In Proc. of the 1974 ACM SIGFIDET (now SIGMOD) Workshop on Data Description, Access and Control (SIGFIDET '74), pp. 321-350. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Z. Khayyat, I.F. Ilyas, A. Jindal, S. Madden, M. Ouzzani, P. Papotti, J.-A. Quiané-Ruiz, N. Tang, and S. Yin. 2015. Bigdansing: A system for big data cleansing. In Proc. of the 2015 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '15), pp. 1215-1230. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Kimball and M. Ross. 2013. The Data Warehouse Toolkit. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://www.kimballgroup.com/data-warehouse-business-intelligence-resources/books/. Last accessed March 2, 2018.Google Scholar
- M. Kornacker, C. Mohan, and J.M. Hellerstein. 1997. Concurrency and recovery in generalized search trees. In Proc. of the 1997 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '97), pp. 62-72. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Lamb, M. Fuller, R. Varadarajan, N. Tran, B. Vandiver, L. Doshi, and C. Bear. August 2012. The Vertica Analytic Database: C-Store 7 years later. Proc. VLDB Endowment, 5(12): 1790-1801. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Lamport. 2001. Paxos Made Simple. http://lamport.azurewebsites.net/pubs/paxos-simple.pdf. Last accessed December 31, 2017.Google Scholar
- D. Laney. 2001. 3D data management: controlling data volume, variety and velocity. META Group Research, February 6. https://blogs.gartner.com/doug-laney/files/2012/01/ad949-3D-Data-Management-Controlling-Data-Volume-Velocity-and-Variety.pdf. Last accessed April 22, 2018.Google Scholar
- P-A. Larson, C. Clinciu, E.N. Hanson, A. Oks, S.L. Price, S. Rangarajan, A. Surna, and Q. Zhou. 2011. SQL server column store indexes. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '11), pp. 1177-1184. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. LeFevre, J. Sankaranarayanan, H. Hacigumus, J. Tatemura, N. Polyzotis, and M. J. Carey. 2014. MISO: Souping up big data query processing with a multistore system. Proc. of the 2014 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '14), pp. 1591-1602. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. G. Lindsay. 1987. A retrospective of R*: a distributed database management system. In Proc. of the IEEE, 75(5): 668-673.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Liskov and S.N. Zilles. 1974. Programming with abstract data types. SIGPLAN Notices, 9(4): 50-59. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Marcin and A. Csillaghy. 2016. Running scientific algorithms as array database operators: Bringing the processing power to the data. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data. pp. 3187-3193.Google Scholar
- T. Mattson, V. Gadepally, Z. She, A. Dziedzic, and J. Parkhurst. 2017. Demonstrating the BigDAWG polystore system for ocean metagenomic analysis. CIDR'17 Chaminade, CA. http://cidrdb.org/cidr2017/papers/p120-mattson-cidr17.pdf.Google Scholar
- J. Meehan, C. Aslantas, S. Zdonik, N. Tatbul, and J. Du. 2017. Data ingestion for the connected world. Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR'17), Chaminade, CA, January.Google Scholar
- A. Metaxides, W. B. Helgeson, R. E. Seth, G. C. Bryson, M. A. Coane, D. G. Dodd, C. P. Earnest, R. W. Engles, L. N. Harper, P. A. Hartley, D. J. Hopkin, J. D. Joyce, S. C. Knapp, J. R. Lucking, J. M. Muro, M. P. Persily, M. A. Ramm, J. F. Russell, R. F. Schubert, J. R. Sidlo, M. M. Smith, and G. T. Werner. April 1971. Data Base Task Group Report to the CODASYL Programming Language Committee. ACM, New York. Google Scholar
- C. Mohan, D. Haderle, B. Lindsay, H. Pirahesh, and P. Schwarz. 1992. ARIES: a transaction recovery method supporting fine-granularity locking and partial rollbacks using write-ahead logging. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 17(1), 94-162. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Motwani, J. Widom, A. Arasu B. Babcock, S. Babu, M. Datar, G. Manku, C. Olston, J. Rosenstein, and R. Varma. 2003. Query processing, approximation, and resource management in a data stream management system. Proc. of the First Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR), January.Google Scholar
- A. Oloso, K-S Kuo, T. Clune, P. Brown, A. Poliakov, H. Yu. 2016. Implementing connected component labeling as a user defined operator for SciDB. Proc. of 2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). Washington, DC.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. A. Olson. 1993. The design and implementation of the inversion file system. USENIX Winter. http://www.usenix.org/conference/usenix-winter-1993-conference/presentation/design-and-implementation-inversion-file-syste. Last accessed January 22, 2018.Google Scholar
- J. C. Ong. 1982. Implementation of abstract data types in the relational database system INGRES, Master of Science Report, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, September 1982.Google Scholar
- A. Palmer. 2013. Culture matters: Facebook CIO talks about how well Vertica, Facebook people mesh. Koa Labs Blog, December 20. http://koablog.wordpress.com/2013/12/20/culture-matters-facebook-cio-talks-about-how-well-vertica-facebook-people-mesh. Last accessed March 14, 2018.Google Scholar
- A. Palmer. 2015a. The simple truth: happy people, healthy company. Tamr Blog, March 23. http://www.tamr.com/the-simple-truth-happy-people-healthy-company/. Last accessed March 14, 2018.Google Scholar
- A. Palmer. 2015b. Where the red book meets the unicorn, Xconomy, June 22. http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2015/06/22/where-the-red-book-meets-the-unicorn/ Last accessed March 14, 2018.Google Scholar
- A. Pavlo and M. Aslett. September 2016. What's really new with NewSQL? ACM SIGMOD Record, 45(2): 45-55. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Press. 2016. Cleaning big data: most time-consuming, least enjoyable data science task, survey says. Forbes, May 23. https://www.forbes.com/sites/gilpress/2016/03/23/data-preparation-most-time-consuming-least-enjoyable-data-science-task-survey-says/#79e14e326f63.Google Scholar
- N. Prokoshyna, J. Szlichta, F. Chiang, R. J. Miller, and D. Srivastava. 2015. Combining quantitative and logical data cleaning. PVLDB, 9(4): 300-311. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Ryvkina, A. S. Maskey, M. Cherniack, and S. Zdonik. 2006. Revision processing in a stream processing engine: a high-level design. Proc. of the 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'06), pp. 141-. Atlanta, GA, April. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Saracco and D. Haderle. 2013. The history and growth of IBM's DB2. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 35(2): 54-66. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Savage. May 2015. Forging relationships. Communications of the ACM, 58(6): 22-23. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. C. Schatz and B. Langmead. 2013. The DNA data deluge. IEEE Spectrum Magazine. https://spectrum.ieee.org/biomedical/devices/the-dna-data-deluge.Google Scholar
- Z. She, S. Ravishankar, and J. Duggan. 2016. BigDAWG polystore query optimization through semantic equivalences. High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC). IEEE, 2016.Google Scholar
- SIGFIDET panel discussion. 1974. In Proc. of the 1974 ACM SIGFIDET (now SIGMOD) Workshop on Data Description, Access and Control: Data Models: Data-Structure-Set Versus Relational (SIGFIDET '74), pp. 121-144. ACM, New York.Google Scholar
- R. Snodgrass. December 1982. Monitoring distributed systems: a relational approach. Ph.D. Dissertation, Computer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Szalay. June 2008. The Sloan digital sky survey and beyond. ACM SIGMOD Record, 37(2): 61-66. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tamr. 2017. Tamr awarded patent for enterprise-scale data unification system. Tamr blog. February 9 2017. https://www.tamr.com/tamr-awarded-patent-enterprise-scale-data-unification-system-2/. Last accessed January 24, 2018.Google Scholar
- R. Tan, R. Chirkova, V. Gadepally, and T. Mattson. 2017. Enabling query processing across heterogeneous data models: A survey. IEEE Big Data Workshop: Methods to Manage Heterogeneous Big Data and Polystore Databases, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
- N. Tatbul and S. Zdonik. 2006. Window-aware Load Shedding for Aggregation Queries over Data Streams. In Proc. of the 32nd International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB'06), Seoul, Korea. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Tatbul, U. Çetintemel, and S. Zdonik. 2007. "Staying FIT: Efficient Load Shedding Techniques for Distributed Stream Processing." International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB'07), Vienna, Austria. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. P. van de Riet. 1986. Expert database systems. In Future Generation Computer Systems, 2(3): 191-199,Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Vartak, S. Rahman, S. Madden, A. Parameswaran, and N. Polyzotis. September 2015. Seedb: Efficient data-driven visualization recommendations to support visual analytics. PVLDB, 8(13): 2182-2193. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Wallace. June 9, 1986. Data base tool links to remote sites. Network World. http://books.google.com/books?id=aBwEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA49&lpg=PA49&dq=ingres+star&source=bl&ots=FSMIR4thMj&sig=S1fzaaOT5CHRq4cwbLFEQp4UYCs&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjJ1J_NttvZAhUG82MKHco2CfAQ6AEIYzAP#v=onepage&q=ingres%20star&f=false. Last accessed March 14, 2018.Google Scholar
- J. Wang and N. J. Tang. 2014. Towards dependable data repairing with fixing rules. In Proc. of the 2014 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '14), pp. 457-468. ACM, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Wong and K. Youssefi. September 1976. Decomposition--a strategy for query processing. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 1(3): 223-241. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Wu and S. Madden. 2013. Scorpion: Explaining away outliers in aggregate queries. PVLDB, 6(8): 553-564. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Xing, S. Zdonik, and J.-H. Hwang. April 2005. Dynamic load distribution in the Borealis Stream Processor. Proc. of the 21st International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'05), Tokyo, Japan. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- The BigDAWG polystore system
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
The BigDAWG Polystore System
This paper presents a new view of federated databases to address the growing need for managing information that spans multiple data models. This trend is fueled by the proliferation of storage engines and query languages based on the observation that '...
A demonstration of the BigDAWG polystore system
Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Kohala Coast, HawaiiThis paper presents BigDAWG, a reference implementation of a new architecture for "Big Data" applications. Such applications not only call for large-scale analytics, but also for real-time streaming support, smaller analytics at interactive speeds, data ...
Towards Dynamic Data Placement for Polystore Ingestion
BIRTE '17: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Real-Time Business Intelligence and AnalyticsIntegrating low-latency data streaming into data warehouse architectures has become an important enhancement to support modern data warehousing applications. In these architectures, heterogeneous workloads with data ingestion and analytical queries must ...
Comments