skip to main content
research-article

It's Not You, It's Me:: Identity, Self-Verification, and Amazon Reviews

Published: 25 May 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Online retailers often incorporate crowdsourced product reviews to make customers feel more informed and comfortable with online purchases, and thus increase profits. The evaluation of these reviews is also crowdsourced, ostensibly to identify "helpful" reviews. The resulting helpfulness ratings are frequently used as measures for discerning what makes reviews helpful, and are used to determine which reviews are given priority viewing on the site. However, there is no empirical evidence that helpfulness voting reflects customers' attempts to evaluate product reviews objectively. This study examines review helpfulness voting from the position of the subjective customer rather than the objective anatomy of the review. We develop and empirically test a model, informed by self-verification theory, which explains relationships between online reviewers' overall opinions of products under consideration (star ratings), product type, and perceived helpfulness of online product reviews. Results suggest that customers' unconscious attempts to confirm what they already know and believe about themselves, referred to as self-verification, influences helpfulness voting. This work contributes to theoretical understanding of the role of reviews from the users' perspective and how, through suggesting new ways to identify helpful reviews, human behaviors can inform design of recommender systems.

References

[1]
Alvarez, R. (2008). Examining technology, structure and identity during an enterprise system implementation. Information Systems Journal, 18(2), 203-224.
[2]
Boudreau, M.-C., C. Serrano, & K. Larson (2014). IT-driven identity work: creating a group identity in a digital environment. Information and Organization, 24(1), 1-24.
[3]
Burke, P. J. & J. E Stets (2009). Identity theory. Oxford, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
[4]
Cao, Q., W. Duan, & Q. Gan (2011). Exploring determinants of voting for the 'helpfulness' of online user reviews: A text mining approach. Decision Support Systems, 50(2), 511-521.
[5]
Carter, M. & Grover, V. (2015). Me, my self, and I(T): Conceptualizing information technology identity and its implications. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 39(4), 931-957.
[6]
Chatterjee, P. (2001). Online reviews: Do consumers use them? Advances in Consumer Research, 28(1), 129-133.
[7]
Chevalier, J. A. & D. Mayzlin (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research. 43(3), 345-354.
[8]
Cho, Y. (2011). Desperately seeking East Asia amidst the popularity of South Korean pop culture in Asia. Cultural Studies, 25(3), 383-404.
[9]
da Cunha, J. V. and W. J. Orlikowski (2008). Performing catharsis: The use of online discussion forums in organizational change. Information and Organization, 18(2), 132-156.
[10]
Cohn, M. A., Mehl, M. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2004). Linguistic markers of psychological change surrounding September 11, 2001. Psychological Science, 15(10), 687-693.
[11]
Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., G. Kossinets, J. Kleinberg, & L. Lee (2009). How opinions are received by online communities: A case study on amazon.com helpfulness votes. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web, 141-150. New York, NY, USA: ACM.
[12]
Dimoka, A. (2010). What does the brain tell us about trust and distrust? Evidence from a functional neuroimaging study. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 34(2), 373-396.
[13]
Dobson, P., P. Jackson, & D. Gengatharen (2013). Explaining broadband adoption in rural Australia: Modes of reflexivity and the morphogenetic approach. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 37(3), 965-991.
[14]
Floyd, K., Freling, R., Alhoqail, S., Cho, H. Y., & Freling, T. (2014). How online product reviews affect retail sales: A meta-analysis. Journal of Retailing, 90(2), 217-232.
[15]
Ghose, A., & Ipeirotis, P. (2011). Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining Text and Reviewer Characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 23(10), 1498-1512.
[16]
Hennig-Thurau, T., K. P. Gwinner, G. Walsh, & D. D. Gremler (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38-52.
[17]
Hesmondhalgh, D. (2012). The cultural industries (3rd Ed.). London: SAGE Publishing.
[18]
Hillmer, U. (2009). Technology Acceptance in Mechatronics: The Influence of Identity on Technology Acceptance. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
[19]
Hinds, P. J. & M. Mortensen (2005). Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organization Science, 16(3), 290-307.
[20]
Hogg, M. A., D. J. Terry, & K. M. White (1995). A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4), 255-269.
[21]
Jacobi, J. A., Benson, E. A., & Linden, G. D. (2006, September 26). U.S. Patent No. 7113917. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
[22]
Jiménez, F. R., & Mendoza, N. A. (2013). Too popular to ignore: The influence of online reviews on purchase intentions of search and experience products. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(3), 226-235.
[23]
Kennedy, P. (1992). A guide to econometrics (3rd Ed.). Cambridge, MA, US: MIT Press.
[24]
Kim, S.-M., P. Pantel, T. Chklovski, & M. Pennacchiotti (2006). Automatically assessing review helpfulness. EMNLP '06: Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (423-430). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
[25]
Kreiner, G. E. & B. E. Ashforth (2004). Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(1), 1-27.
[26]
Lang, K., R. Shang, & R. Vragov (2015). Consumer co-creation of digital culture products: Business threat or new opportunity? Journal of the Association for Information Systems 16(9), 766- 798.
[27]
Lee, Y., J. Lee, & Z. Lee (2006). Social influence on technology acceptance behavior: Self-identity theory perspective. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 37(2-3), 60-75
[28]
Liu, J., Y. Cao, C.-Y. Lin, Y. Huang, & M. Zhou (2007). Low-quality product review detection in opinion summarization. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL) (334-342). Prague: Association for Computational Linguistics.
[29]
Liu, N. & H. C. Chan (2010). Understanding the influence of social identity on social support seeking behaviors in virtual healthcare community. In ICIS 2010 Proceedings (1-12).
[30]
McFadden, D. (1972). Conditional Logic Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California.
[31]
Mudambi, S. M. & D. Schuff (2010). What makes a helpful review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. Management information Systems Quarterly, 34(1), 185-200.
[32]
Nandhakumar, J., N. S. Panourgias, & H. Scarbrough (2013). From knowing it to 'getting it': Envisioning practices in computer games development. Information Systems Research, 24(4), 933-955.
[33]
Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 311-329.
[34]
Nelson, P. (1974). Advertising as Information. Journal of Political Economy, 82(4), 729-754.
[35]
Pariser, E. (2012). The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web is Changing What We Read and How We Think. NY, NY: Penguin Books.
[36]
Park, S. & J. L. Nicolau (2015). Asymmetric effects of online consumer reviews. Annals of Tourism Research, 50, 67-83.
[37]
Pennebaker, J.W., Booth, R.J., Boyd, R.L., & Francis, M.E. (2015). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC2015 {computer software}. Austin, TX: Pennebaker Conglomerates.
[38]
Pinch, T. & F. Kesler (2011). How Aunt Ammy gets her free lunch: A study of the top-thousand customer reviewers at Amazon.com. Retrieved from http://www.freelunch.me/filecabinet/HowAuntAmmyGetsHerFreeLunch-FINAL.pdf
[39]
Ren, Y., F. M. Harper, S. Drenner, L. Terveen, S. Kiesler., J. Riedl, & R. E. Kraut (2012). Building member attachment in online communities: Applying theories of group identity and interpersonal bonds. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 36(3), 841-864.
[40]
Scholz, M. & V. Dorner (2013). The recipe for the perfect review? Business & Information Systems Engineering, 5(3), 141-151.
[41]
Singh, J. P., Irani, S., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Saumya, S., & Kumar Roy, P. (2017). Predicting the "helpfulness" of online consumer reviews. Journal of Business Research, 70(Supplement C), 346-355.
[42]
Statista (2017a). Leading e-retailers worldwide in 2015, based on retail revenue (in billion U.S. dollars). Retrieved October 31, 2017, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/287950/leading-e-retailers-worldwide-based-on-revenue/
[43]
Statista (2017b). Retail e-commerce sales worldwide from 2014 to 2021 (in billion U.S. dollars). Retrieved October 31, 2017 from http://www.census.gov/econ/estats/e13-estats.pdf
[44]
Stets, J. E. & P. J. Burke (2005). A sociological approach to self and identity. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.) Handbook of self and identity. New York; London: Guilford Press.
[45]
Stryker, S. & P. J. Burke (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 284-297.
[46]
Swann, W. B. (1983). Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. In J. M. Suls & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.) Social psychological perspectives on the self. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 33-66.
[47]
Swann, W. B. (2011). Self-verification theory. In P. Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.) Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2) (23-42). Los Angeles, CA, UA: Sage Publications.
[48]
Swann, W. B. & M. D. Buhrmester (2014). Self-verification: The search for coherence. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity, second edition (405-424). New York: Guilford Press.
[49]
Swann, W. B. & S. J. Read (1981). Self-verification processes: How we sustain our self-conceptions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17(4), 351-372.
[50]
Throsby, C. D. (2001). Economics and culture. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
[51]
Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96(3), 506-520.
[52]
Tsai, H.-T. & R. P. Bagozzi (2014). Contribution behavior in virtual communities: Cognitive, emotional, and social influences. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 38(1), 143-163.
[53]
Tsao, W. (2014). Which type of online review is more persuasive? The influence of consumer reviews and critic ratings on moviegoers. Electronic Commerce Research 14(4), 559-583.
[54]
Vaast, E. (2007). Playing with masks: Fragmentation and continuity in the presentation of self in an occupational online forum. Information Technology & People 2(14), 334-351. .
[55]
Vignoles, V. L., S. J. Schwartz, & K. Luyckx (2011). Introduction: Toward an integrative view of identity. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.) Handbook of identity theory and research (Vol. 1-Structures and processes). New York: Springer, 1-27.
[56]
Walsh, I. (2014). A strategic path to study IT use through users' IT culture and IT needs: A mixed-method grounded theory. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(2), 146-173.
[57]
Walsh, I., H. Kefi, & R. Baskerville (2010). Managing culture creep: Toward a strategic model of user IT culture. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19(4), 257-280.
[58]
Wertenbroch, K., & Dhar, R. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), 60-71.
[59]
Whitley, E. A., U. Gal, & A. Kjaergaard (2013). Who do you think you are? A review of the complex interplay between information systems, identification and identity. European Journal of Information Systems 23(1), 17-35.
[60]
Wicklund, R. A. & P. M. Gollwitzer (1982). Symbolic self-completion. Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lerlbaum Associates.
[61]
Wu, P. F., H. van der Heijden, & N. Korfiatis (2011). The influences of negativity and review quality on the helpfulness of online reviews. ICIS 2011 Proceedings (3710-3719).
[62]
Xiao, B., & Benbasat, I. (2007). E-commerce product recommendation agents: Use, characteristics, and impact. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 31(1), 137-209.
[63]
Zhao, Y., S. Yang, V. Narayan, & Y. Zhao (2012). Modeling consumer learning from online product reviews. Marketing Science, 32(1), 153-169.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024) Messenger vs. Message: The Curious Case of Where’d My Giggle Go? Religion & Education10.1080/15507394.2024.236833251:4(361-378)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2024
  • (2023)An Experimental Study to Examine Relationships Between IT Identity and Users’ Post-Adoption Behaviors for Different Types of Health ApplicationsInformation Systems Management10.1080/10580530.2023.223718741:3(238-264)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2023
  • (2022)Denigrating Women, Venerating “Chad”: Ingroup and Outgroup Evaluations among Male Supremacists on RedditSocial Psychology Quarterly10.1177/0190272522109090785:3(279-299)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems
ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems  Volume 49, Issue 2
May 2018
92 pages
ISSN:0095-0033
EISSN:1532-0936
DOI:10.1145/3229335
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 May 2018
Published in SIGMIS Volume 49, Issue 2

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Crowdsourcing
  2. Electronic Word-of-Mouth (eWOM)
  3. Identity
  4. Product Reviews
  5. Self-verification

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)51
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024) Messenger vs. Message: The Curious Case of Where’d My Giggle Go? Religion & Education10.1080/15507394.2024.236833251:4(361-378)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2024
  • (2023)An Experimental Study to Examine Relationships Between IT Identity and Users’ Post-Adoption Behaviors for Different Types of Health ApplicationsInformation Systems Management10.1080/10580530.2023.223718741:3(238-264)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2023
  • (2022)Denigrating Women, Venerating “Chad”: Ingroup and Outgroup Evaluations among Male Supremacists on RedditSocial Psychology Quarterly10.1177/0190272522109090785:3(279-299)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2022
  • (2020)Time-based Sampling Methods for Detecting Helpful Reviews2020 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT)10.1109/WIIAT50758.2020.00076(508-513)Online publication date: Dec-2020
  • (2020)Intended audience and valence of electronic word-of-mouth on social media: a study of Dutch consumersInternet Research10.1108/INTR-03-2020-013331:3(990-1017)Online publication date: 31-Dec-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media