Daniela Giacomelli
ABSTRACT
Human Activity Recognition (RAH) aims to classify the activities performed by a user collecting data from heterogeneous sensors. The RAH allows the monitoring of user actions, offering services in the area of medical care, in the accompaniment of the elderly, health monitoring, fitness tracking, home and work automation, among others. The RAH can be seen as an Information System composed by three steps: data collection and preprocessing, feature extraction and classification. Despite the abundance of works proposed for this subject, an important issue to be addressed is how to choose the tools and methods to be used in each step of the RAH. This choice is a difficult process, because it involves comparing the results obtained by other works, most of which use private datasets, extract different sets of features, and use different classification algorithms. This paper aims to characterize and compare the main tools, methods and databases for the RAH task. In addition, it aims to provide guidance and guidelines for future research in the area. Experiments were performed in order to identify the main attributes to be used in the classification. It can observed the attributes mean, standard deviation, and variance produce the best models to the classification task.
- Zahraa S Abdallah, Mohamed Medhat Gaber, Bala Srinivasan, and Shonali Krishnaswamy. 2016. Anynovel: detection of novel concepts in evolving data streams. Evolving Systems 7, 2 (2016), 73--93.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Renan Cerqueira Afonso Alves, Cíntia B Margi, Fabíola CL dos Santos, and Bruno T de Oliveira. 2013. Redes de Sensores sem Fio Aplicadas à Fisioterapia: Implementação e Validação de um Sistema de Monitoramento de Amplitude de Movimento. iSys-Revista Brasileira de Sistemas de Informação 5, 1 (2013).Google Scholar
- Davide Anguita, Alessandro Ghio, Luca Oneto, Xavier Parra, and Jorge Luis Reyes-Ortiz. 2013. A Public Domain Dataset for Human Activity Recognition using Smartphones.. In European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks(ESANN).Google Scholar
- Oresti Baños, Miguel Damas, Héctor Pomares, Ignacio Rojas, Máté Attila Tóth, and Oliver Amft. 2012. A benchmark dataset to evaluate sensor displacement in activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 1026--1035. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oresti Banos, Mate Attila Toth, Miguel Damas, Hector Pomares, and Ignacio Rojas. 2014. Dealing with the effects of sensor displacement in wearable activity recognition. Sensors 14, 6 (2014), 9995--10023.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alex Benfica. {n. d.}. Celulares com acelerometro, Month = Novembro, Year = 2016, Url = https://www.telefonescelulares.com.br/celulares-com-acelerometro.Google Scholar
- João C. CAMILO, Cássio O.; SILVA. 2017. Mineração de Dados: Conceitos, Tarefas, Métodos e Ferramentas. http://www.inf.ufg.br/sites/default/files/uploads/relatorios-tecnicos/RT-INF_001-09.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Pierluigi Casale, Oriol Pujol, and Petia Radeva. 2011. Human activity recognition from accelerometer data using a wearable device. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis (2011), 289--296. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pierluigi Casale, Oriol Pujol, and Petia Radeva. 2012. Personalization and user verification in wearable systems using biometric walking patterns. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 16, 5 (2012), 563--580. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nigel Davies, Daniel P Siewiorek, and Rahul Sukthankar. 2008. Activity-based computing. IEEE Pervasive Computing 7, 2 (2008), 20--21. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rogerio Garcia Dutra and Moacyr Martucci. 2008. Adaptive Fuzzy Neural Tree Network. IEEE Latin America Transactions 6, 5 (2008).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jennifer R Kwapisz, Gary M Weiss, and Samuel A Moore. 2011. Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers. ACM SigKDD Explorations Newsletter 12, 2 (2011), 74--82. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Lichman. 2013. UCI Machine Learning Repository. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/mlGoogle Scholar
- Jeffrey W Lockhart, Tony Pulickal, and Gary M Weiss. 2012. Applications of mobile activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 1054--1058. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jeffrey W Lockhart and Gary M Weiss. 2014. The benefits of personalized smartphone-based activity recognition models. In Proceedings of the 2014 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. SIAM, 614--622.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alexandre Lopes, João Mendes-Moreira, and João Gama. 2012. Semi-supervised learning: predicting activities in Android environment. In Workshop on Ubiquitous Data Mining. 38.Google Scholar
- Elaine Ribeiro de Faria Paiva. 2014. Detecção de novidade em fluxos contínuos de dados multiclasse. Ph.D. Dissertation. Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar
- Nishkam Ravi, Nikhil Dandekar, Preetham Mysore, and Michael L Littman. 2005. Activity recognition from accelerometer data. In Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), Vol. 5. 1541--1546. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eduardo Welter Ritter and Sandro José Rigo. 2016. FITDATA: Um sistema para monitoramento de atividade física baseado em dispositivos móveis. (2016).Google Scholar
- Allan Stisen, Henrik Blunck, Sourav Bhattacharya, Thor Siiger Prentow, Mikkel Baun Kjærgaard, Anind Dey, Tobias Sonne, and Mads Møller Jensen. 2015. Smart devices are different: Assessing and mitigatingmobile sensing heterogeneities for activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. ACM, 127--140. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lin Sun, Daqing Zhang, Bin Li, Bin Guo, and Shijian Li. 2010. Activity recognition on an accelerometer embedded mobile phone with varying positions and orientations. Ubiquitous intelligence and computing (2010), 548--562. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pang-Ning Tan et al. 2006. Introduction to data mining. Pearson Education India.Google Scholar
- Gary M Weiss, Jeffrey W Lockhart, Tony T Pulickal, Paul T McHugh, Isaac H Ronan, and Jessica L Timko. 2016. Actitracker: a smartphone-based activity recognition system for improving health and well-being. In Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), 2016 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 682--688.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ian H Witten, Eibe Frank, Mark A Hall, and Christopher J Pal. 2016. Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ian H Witten, Eibe Frank, Mark A Hall, and Christopher J Pal. 2016. Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Study and Characterization of the Main Tools for Human Activity Recognition using Accelerometer Sensors
Recommendations
Human Activity Recognition for Healthcare using Smartphones
ICMLC '18: Proceedings of the 2018 10th International Conference on Machine Learning and ComputingThe healthcare benefits associated with regular physical activity monitoring and recognition has been considered in several research studies. Solid evidence shows that regular monitoring and recognition of physical activity can potentially assist to ...
Human activity recognition from multiple sensors data using deep CNNs
AbstractSmart devices with sensors now enable continuous measurement of activities of daily living. Accordingly, various human activity recognition (HAR) experiments have been carried out, aiming to convert the measures taken from smart devices into ...
A spanning tree-based human activity prediction system using life logs from depth silhouette-based human activity recognition
CAIP'11: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Computer analysis of images and patterns - Volume Part IIn this work, we propose a Human Activity Prediction (HAP) system using activity sequence spanning trees constructed from a life-log created by a video sensor-based daily Human Activity Recognition (HAR) system using time-sequential Independent ...
Comments