skip to main content
10.1145/3230654.3230660acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Optimal pricing for a peer-to-peer sharing platform under network externalities

Published:18 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we analyse how a peer-to-peer sharing platform should price its service (when imagined as an excludable public good) to maximize profit, when each user's participation adds value to the platform service by creating a positive externality to other participants. To characterize network externalities as a function of the number of participants, we consider different bounded and unbounded user utility models. The bounded utility model fits many infrastructure sharing applications with bounded network value, in which complete coverage has a finite user valuation (e.g., WiFi or hotspot). The unbounded utility model fits the large scale data sharing and explosion in social media, where it is expected that the network value follows Metcalfe's or Zipf's law. For both models, we analyze the optimal pricing schemes to select heterogeneous users in the platform under complete and incomplete information of users' service valuations. We propose the concept of price of information (PoI) to characterize the profit loss due to lack of information, and present provable PoI bounds for different utility models. We show that the PoI = 2 for the bounded utility model, meaning that just half of profit is lost, whereas the PoI ≥ 2 for the unbounded utility model and increases as for a less concave utility function. We also show that the complicated differentiated pricing scheme which is optimal under incomplete user information, can be replaced by a single uniform price scheme that is asymptotic optimal. Finally, we extend our pricing schemes to a two-sided market by including a new group of 'pure' service users contributing no externalities, and show that the platform may charge zero price to the original group of users in order to attract the pure user group.

References

  1. P. Antoniadis, C. Courcoubetis, and R. Mason. 2004. Comparing economic incentives in peer-to-peer networks. Computer Networks 46, 1 (2004), 133--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. B. Briscoe, A. Odlyzko, and B. Tilly. 2006. Metcalfe's law is wrong - communications networks increase in value as they add members-but by how much? IEEE Spectrum 43, 7 (2006), 34--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. O. Candogan, K. Bimpikis, and A. Ozdaglar. 2012. Optimal Pricing in Networks with Externalities. Operations Research 60, 4 (2012), 883--905. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Courcoubetis and R. Weber. 2006. Incentives for large peer-to-peer systems. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 24, 5 (2006), 1034--1050. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. P. Golle, K. Leyton-Brown, I. Mironov, and M. Lillibridge. 2001. Incentives for Sharing in Peer-to-Peer Networks. In Electronic Commerce, Ludger Fiege, Gero Mühl, and Uwe Wilhelm (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 75--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. X. Gong, L. Duan, X. Chen, and J. Zhang. 2017. When Social Network Effect Meets Congestion Effect in Wireless Networks: Data Usage Equilibrium and Optimal Pricing. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 35, 2 (2017), 449--462. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C.Jiang, L. Gao, L. Duan, and J. Huang. 2018. Scalable Mobile Crowdsensing via Peer-to-Peer Data Sharing. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 17, 4 (2018), 898--912.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Y. Li, C. Courcoubetis, and L. Duan. 2017. Dynamic Routing for Social Information Sharing. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 35, 3 (2017), 571--585. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Y. Li, C. Courcoubetis, L. Duan, and R. Weber. 2018. Optimal pricing for a peer-to-peer sharing platform under network externalities. Technical Report. https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.09616Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. H. Manshaei, J. Freudiger, M. Felegyhazi, P. Marbach, and J. P. Hubaux. 2008. On Wireless Social Community Networks. In IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Juniper Research. 2017. Sharing economy revenues to double by 2022, reaching over $40 billlion. Retrieved Apr 24, 2018 from https://www.juniperresearch. com/press/press-releases/sharing-economy-revenues-to-double-by-2022Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. X. Wang, L. Duan, and J. Zhang. 2018. Mobile Social Services with Network Externality: From Separate Pricing to Bundled Pricing. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Optimal pricing for a peer-to-peer sharing platform under network externalities

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      NetEcon '18: Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Economics of Networks, Systems and Computation
      June 2018
      35 pages
      ISBN:9781450359160
      DOI:10.1145/3230654

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 June 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      NetEcon '18 Paper Acceptance Rate10of18submissions,56%Overall Acceptance Rate10of18submissions,56%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader