ABSTRACT
This paper focuses and reviews the different approaches to address Organizational Interoperability (OIOP). OIOP Approach refers here to the formalization and modelisation that have been proposed to deal with the subject. Those approaches address differently OIOP. Thus a critical comparison is established to attempt understanding if some common aspects are addressed such as security aspect, the impact of semantic and technical layer.
- DODD (1977) DODD 2010.6 Standardization and interoperability of weapon systems and equipment within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. NATOGoogle Scholar
- CEC (2000) Council of the European Union and Commission of the Euopean Communities: eEurope 2002 C An Information Society of All V Action Plan, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/eeurope/2002/documents/archiv_eEurope2002/actionplan_en.pdf.Google Scholar
- EPAN (2004) European public administration network, e-government working group: key principles of an interoperability architecture. Brussels.http://www.epractice.eu/en/library/281244.Google Scholar
- ETSI (2006) European Telecommunications Standards Institute: achieving technical interoperability. The ETSI approach. ETSI white paper No. 3. By Hans van der Veer (Lucent Technologies) and Anthony Wiles (ETSI), October 2006. http://www.etsi.org/website/document/whitepapers/wp3_iop_final.pdf.Google Scholar
- Christine Legner and Baptiste Lebreton (2007) Preface to the Focus Theme Section: "Business Interoperability" Business Interoperability Research: Present Achievements and Upcoming Challenges, Electronic Markets, 17:3, 176--186. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Scholl HJ, Klischewski R (2007) E-government integration and interoperability: framing the research agenda. Int J Public Admin (IJPA) 30(8-9):889--920Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kutvonen, L. (2007). Interoperability knowledge management issues. In R. Gonzales, J. P. Muller, K. Mertins and Z. Martin (Eds.), Enterprise interoperability II (pp. 629--632). London: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
- Vallespir, B. and Chapurlat, V. (2007). Enterprise modelling and verification approach for characterizing and checking organizational interoperability. 2007 IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (EFTA 2007).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gottschalk, P and Solli-Saether, Hans. (2009). E-Government interoperability and information resource integration: Frameworks for aligned development. textitE-Government Interoperability and Information Resource Integration: Frameworks for Aligned Development. 1--282. 10.4018/978-1-60566-648-8.Google Scholar
- EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2010) Towards interoperability for European public services. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52010DC0744Google Scholar
- Van der Aals W. M. P., Lohmann N., Massuthe P., Stahl C.,Wolf K. (2010), Multiparty Contracts: Agreeing and Implementing Interorganizational Processes, The Computer Journal Vol. 53(2010), No. 1, p. 90--106. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kubicek, H, Cimander, R, Scholl, H (2011). Organizational Interoperability in E-Government - Lessons from 77 European Good-Practice Cases. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Prado TA., Nam T., Burke GB. (2011) E-government interoperability: interaction of policy, management and technology dimensions. Social science computing review, DOS http://ssc.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/01/11/0894439310392184.full.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Novakouski. Marc and Lewis. Grace, "Interoperability in the e-Government Context," Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Technical Note CMU/SEI-2011-TN-014, 2012. http://resources.sei.cmu.edu/library/asset-view.cfm?AssetID=9869Google Scholar
- Taoudi, A., Bounabat, B., Elmir, B. "Toward a methodology to control interoperability improvement projects execution", 5th International IFIP Working Conference on Enterprise Interoperability, IWEI 2013; Enschede; Netherlands; 27 March 2013 through 28 March 2013; Code 96295Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Volume 144, Pages 186--197, LNBIP, 2013Google ScholarCross Ref
- Taoudi, A., Bounabat, B., Elmir, B. "Quality based project control using interoperability degree as a quality factor" 3rd International Symposium ISKO-Maghreb,; Marrakesh; Morocco; 8 November 2013 through 9 November 2013; Article number 67281172013, Code 102736Google Scholar
- Elmir, B., Bounabat, B. "Integrated public e-services interoperability assessment" International Journal of Information Science and Management Issue SPL.ISSUE2, 2010, Pages 1--12Google Scholar
- Zarko, I.P. et al. 2017. Towards an IoT framework for semantic and organizational interoperability. 2017 Global Internet of Things Summit (GIoTS) (Jun. 2017).Google Scholar
- Reyes Jr. Regalado and Tangkeko, Marivic S., "Interoperability Framework for Government E-Services of the Philippines" (2017). PACIS 2017 Proceedings. 33. http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2017/33. Accessed November the 17th, 2017.Google Scholar
- Juell-Skielse, G. et al. 2017. Modes of collaboration and expected benefits of inter-organizational E-government initiatives: A multi-case study. Government Information Quarterly. 34, 4 (Dec. 2017), 578--590.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- A Review of the Governement Information Systems of Organizational Interoperability
Recommendations
Assessment of organizational interoperability in e-Government: a new model and tool for assessing organizational interoperability maturity of a public service in practice
ICEGOV '20: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceThe achievement of interoperability between public administrations across Europe is considered to be a crucial factor for the delivery of efficient, cost-effective and transparent public services. There are still many challenges and limitations to be ...
Measuring organizational interoperability in practice: the case study of population welfare department of government of Sindh, Pakistan
ICEGOV '12: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceGovernment organizations use technology to interoperate with each other in order to provide effective and efficient services to the citizens. Interoperation between these organizations is challenging due to the organizational differences among different ...
Interoperability in digital electrocardiography: harmonization of ISO/IEEE x73-PHD and SCP-ECG
The ISO/IEEE 11073 (x73) family of standards is a reference frame for medical device interoperability. A draft for an ECG device specialization (ISO/IEEE 11073-10406-d02) has already been presented to the Personal Health Device (PHD) Working Group, and ...
Comments