skip to main content
10.1145/3230905.3230950acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslopalConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Predicting Risk of Getting Smoking-Related Cancer: A Comparison of Three Prediction Models

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 May 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Smoking1 brings the biggest cause of cancer and deaths every year. It is essential for the smoker to aware of the bad effect of smoking and quit smoking. Therefore, cancer prediction tools are used to help in early diagnosis of cancer for the smoker for them to change their lifestyle to lower the risk of getting cancer in the future. Recently, there are many research study on early detection and diagnosis of cancer by using machine learning techniques. The cancer prediction algorithms that discussed here are decision tree algorithm, linear regression algorithm and support vector machine algorithm. These algorithms are widely used in the development of cancer prediction model. The strengths, limitations, and accuracy of each cancer prediction model are compared and analysed. In conclusion, linear regression algorithm shown the best result for the cancer prediction based on the analysis done on each cancer prediction algorithm.

References

  1. S. P Saha, D. K Bhalla, T. F Whayne and C. Gairola. 2007. Cigarette smoke and adverse health effects: An overview of research trends and future needs. International Journal of Angiology, vol. 16, no. 03, 77--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. H. Lim, H. Teh, L. Lim, J. Lau, C. Kee, S. Ghazali, Y. Chan, M. Sabtu, H. Ismail, N. Zaki, L. Thomas, K. Lim, S. Cheong, N. Ibrahim and M. Yusoff. 2015. Smoking among Secondary School Students in Kota Tinggi, Johor, Malaysia - Findings from a Cross-Sectional Study. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 16, no. 11, 4563--4570.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. World Health Organization. Early cancer diagnosis saves lives, cuts treatment costs. Updated February 2017. Available online: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2017/early-cancer-costs/en/ (accessed on 1 September 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. W. Loh. 2014. Fifty Years of Classification and Regression Trees. International Statistical Review, vol. 82, no. 3, 329--348.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. S. Salzberg. 1994. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning by J. Ross Quinlan. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., Machine Learning, vol. 16, no.3, 235--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Han, Jiawei, Kamber, Micheline, 2000. Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kemal Hakan Gülkesen, İsmail Türker Köksal, Sebahat özdem, Osman Saka 2010. Prediction of prostate cancer using decision tree algorithm. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 40(5), 681--686.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. A. Gordon, L. Breiman, J. Friedman, R. Olshen and C. Stone. 1984. Classification and Regression Trees. Biometrics, vol. 40, no. 3, 874.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M. Garzotto, T. Beer, R. Hudson, L. Peters, Y. Hsieh, E. Barrera, T. Klein and M. Mori. 2005. Improved Detection of Prostate Cancer Using Classification and Regression Tree Analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 23, no. 19, 4322--4329.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. E. Alexopoulos. 2010. Introduction to Multivariate Regression Analysis, pp. 14(Suppl 1): 23--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Park S, Nam B-H, Yang H-R, Lee JA, Lim H, Han JT, et al. (2013) Individualized Risk Prediction Model for Lung Cancer in Korean Men. PLoS ONE 8(2): e54823.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Hosseinzadeh, F., KayvanJoo, A.H., Ebrahimi, M. et al. SpringerPlus (2013) 2: 238.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. C. Lynch, B. Abdollahi, J. Fuqua, A. de Carlo, J. Bartholomai, R. Balgemann, V. van Berkel and H. Frieboes. 2017. Prediction of lung cancer patient survival via supervised machine learning classification techniques. 2017. International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 108, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Y. Liu, R. Ni, H. Zhang, L. Miao, J. Wang, W. Jia and Y. Wang. 2016. Identification of feature genes for smoking-related lung adenocarcinoma based on gene expression profile data. OncoTargets and Therapy, vol. 9, 7397--7407.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Huang C, Mezencev R, McDonald JF, and Vannberg F. 2017. Open source machine-learning algorithms for the prediction of optimal cancer drug therapies. PLoS ONE 12(10): e0186906.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Lora A. Plaskon, David F. Penson, Thomas L. Vaughan and Janet L. Stanford. 2003. Cigarette Smoking and Risk of Prostate Cancer in Middle-Aged Men. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, vol. 12, no.2, 604--609.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. V.Krishnaiah, G.Narsimha, and N.Subhash Chandra. 2013. Diagnosis of Lung Cancer Prediction System Using Data Mining Classification Techniques. (IJCSIT) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, vol. 4, no.3, 39 - 45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hippisley-Cox, J., and Coupland, C. 2015. Development and validation of risk prediction algorithms to estimate future risk of common cancers in men and women: Prospective cohort study. BMJ Open, 5(3)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Hippisley-Cox, J., Coupland, C., and Brindle, P. 2017. Development and validation of QRISK3 risk prediction algorithms to estimate future risk of cardiovascular disease: Prospective cohort study. BMJ: British Medical Journal (Online).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Sun T, Zhang R, Wang J, Li X, and Guo X. 2013. Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Early-Stage Lung Cancer Based on Longitudinal and Balanced Data. PLoS ONE 8(5): e63559.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    LOPAL '18: Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning and Optimization Algorithms: Theory and Applications
    May 2018
    357 pages
    ISBN:9781450353045
    DOI:10.1145/3230905

    Copyright © 2018 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 2 May 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    LOPAL '18 Paper Acceptance Rate61of141submissions,43%Overall Acceptance Rate61of141submissions,43%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader