skip to main content
10.1145/3230905.3230955acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslopalConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards New Approach to Enhance Learning Based on Internet of Things and Virtual Reality

Published:02 May 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Internet of Things (IoT) and Virtual Reality (VR) are two of the most significant technologies of the last decades that will surely influence many technologies in the few coming years. According to the experts at Gartner, 20.8 billion new things will be connected by 2020 and researchers at kzero expect that only by 2018, there will be more than 170 million VR active user over the world. The IoT refers to the network of internet connected objects that are able to collect, exchange data and make decisions, while VR intends to provide a computer-generated 3D environment that can be used to build real-time tools that can monitor every response made by the user in a natural way. VR has the ability to change the world in some incredible ways, while the IoT already has did. Therefore, much promise and opportunities lay in these two technologies. Taken individually, IoT and VR find their applications in almost every field. In this paper we focus on the educational field, thus the confluence of IoT and VR technologies can bring more new opportunities and possibilities for the improvement and the effectiveness of both learning/training process and educational institution's infrastructure. In this sense, we propose a new approach that can allow learners to consolidate their conceptual learning with tangible experiences in a novel manner.

References

  1. Zaid AjazMoharkan, Tanupriya Choudhury, Subhash C. Gupta, and Gaurav Raj. 2017. Internet of Things and its applications in E-learning. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Technology (CICT). IEEE, Ghaziabad India, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Majid Bayani, Alberto Segura, Jeffrie Saenz, and Brayan Mora. 2017. Internet of Things Simulation Tools: Proposing Educational Components. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Advances in System Simulation, Vol. 1. IARIA XPS Press, Athens Greece, 57--63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Thiyagarajan M. Bojan, Umamaheswaran R. Kumar, and Viswanathan M. Bojan. 2014. An Internet of Things based Intelligent Transportation System. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety. IEEE, Hyderabad India, 174--179.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Angelo P. Castellani, Nicola Bui, Paolo Casari, Michele Rossi, Zach Shelby, and Michele Zorzi. 2010. Architecture and Protocols for the Internet of Things: A Case Study. In Proceedings of the pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM). IEEE, Mannheim Germany, 678--683.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Yunguang Chen and Xue Dong. 2013. The Development and Prospect of New Technology in Modern distance education. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Science and Computer Applications (Advances in Intelligent Systems Research), Jianguo Hu (Ed.). Atlantis Press, Hu Nan China, 40--44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Hsu-Chen Cheng and Wen-Wei Liao. 2012. Establishing an lifelong learning environment using IOT and learning analytics. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT). IEEE, PyeongChang South Korea, 1178--1183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jeannette Chin and Vic Callaghan. 2013. Educational Living Labs: A Novel Internet-of-Things Based Approach to Teaching and Research. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Environments. IEEE, Athens Greece, 92--99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Mohamed Fahim, Abdeslam Jakimi, and Lahcen El Bermi. 2016. Pedagogical Scenarization for Virtual Environments for Training: Towards Genericity, Coherence and Adaptivity. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science 3, 12 (2016), 96--103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Laura Freina and Michela Ott. 2015. A Literature Review on Immersive Virtual Reality in Education: State Of The Art and Perspectives. In Proceedings of Conference: eLearning and Software for Education (eLSE). Bucharest Romania.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jorge Gòmez, Juan F. Huete, Oscar Hoyos, Luis Perez, and Daniela Grigori. 2013. Interaction System based on Internet of Things as Support for Education. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Emerging Ubiquitous Systems and Pervasive Networks (EUSPN-2013) (Procedia Computer Science), Vol. 21. Elsevier Science, 132--139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Jorge Gòmez, Byron Oviedo, and Emilio Zhuma. 2016. Patient Monitoring System Based on Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Ambient Systems, Networks and Technologies (ANT 2016) (Procedia Computer Science), Vol. 83. Elsevier Science, 90--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Shahla Gul, Muhammad Asif, Shahbaz Ahmad, Muhammad Yasir, Muhammad Majid, and M. Sheraz Arshad Malik. 2017. A Survey on Role of Internet of Things in Education. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security 17, 5 (2017), 159--165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Robert R.Harmon, Enrique G. Castro-Leon, and Sandhiprakash Bhide. 2015. Smart cities and the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the international Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET). IEEE, Portland USA, 458--495.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Alexander Ilic and Elgar Fleisch. 2016. Augmented Reality and the Internet of Things. Auto-ID Labs White Paper, No. BIZAPP-068 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Krijn, P.M.G Emmelkamp, R.P Olafsson, and R. Biemond. 2004. Virtual reality exposure therapy of anxiety disorders: A review. Clinical Psychology Review 24, 3 (2004), 259--281.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Elinda A. Lee and Kok W. Wong. 2008. A Review of Using Virtual Reality for Learning. In Transactions on Edutainment I, Zhigeng Pan, Adrian D. Cheok, Wolfgang Müller, and Abdennour El Rhalibi (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5080. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Chapter 18, 231--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Rui Liu and Yongqi Ge. 2017. Smart home system design based on Internet of Things. In Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Computer Science and Education (ICCSE). IEEE, Houston USA, 444--448.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Fahim Mohamed, Jakimi Abdeslam, and El bermi Lahcen. 2017. Personalization of learning activities within a virtual environment for training based on fuzzy logic theory. In Proceedings of 11th International Conference e-Learning. ERIC, Lisbon Portugal, 179--183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Fahim Mohamed, Jakimi Abdeslam, and El bermi Lahcen. 2017. Personalization of learning situations within a virtual environment for training based on fuzzy clustering. International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications 7, 3 (2017), 255--259.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. M.R.M.Veeramanickam and M. Mohanapriya. 2016. IoT enabled Futurus Smart Campus with effective E-Learning: i-Campus. GSTF Journal of Engineering Technology (JET) 3, 4 (2016), 81--87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Sarah Nichols and Harshada Patel. 2002. Health and safety implications of virtual reality:a review of empirical evidence. Applied Ergonomics 33, 3 (2002), 251--271.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Federica Pallavicini, Nicola Toniazzi, Luca Argenton, Luciana Aceti, and Fabrizia Mantovani. 2015. Developing effective virtual reality training for military forces and emergency operators: from technology to human factors. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Modeling and Applied Simulation. Bergeggi Italy, 206--210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Albert Rizzo, Thomas D. Parsons, Belinda Lange, Patrick Kenny, John G. Buckwalter, Barbara Rothbaum, JoAnn Difede, John Frazier, Brad Newman, Josh Williams, and Greg Reger. 2011. Health and safety implications of virtual reality:a review of empirical evidence. Applied Ergonomics 18, 2 (2011), 176--187.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Neil Vaughan, Venketesh N. Dubey, Thomas W. Wainwright, and Robert G. Middleton. 2015. A review of virtual reality based training simulators for orthopaedic surgery. Medical Engineering and Physics 38, 2 (2015), 59--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. C.N. Verdouw, Wolfert Jacques, and Tekinerdogan Bedir. 2016. Internet of Things in agriculture. CAB Reviews 11 (2016), 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Yafang Wang. 2010. English interactive teaching model which based upon Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the international Conference on Computer Application and System Modeling (ICAS 2010). IEEE, Taiyuan China, 587--590.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Towards New Approach to Enhance Learning Based on Internet of Things and Virtual Reality

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            LOPAL '18: Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning and Optimization Algorithms: Theory and Applications
            May 2018
            357 pages
            ISBN:9781450353045
            DOI:10.1145/3230905

            Copyright © 2018 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 2 May 2018

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            LOPAL '18 Paper Acceptance Rate61of141submissions,43%Overall Acceptance Rate61of141submissions,43%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader