skip to main content
10.1145/3231053.3231080acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicfndsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Parallel genetic algorithm with elite and diverse cores for solving the minimum connected dominating set problem in wireless networks topology control

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Finding an efficient communication structure among wireless network access points and wireless sensor nodes is essential in optimizing energy consumption and minimizing broadcast latency. Wireless networks Can control their nodes for efficient resource utilization via Topology Control. A topology control based on obtaining Minimum Connected Dominating Set (MCDS) is an efficient approach for constructing wireless network virtual backbone. A virtual backbone reduces energy consumption, reduce communication interference, reduce routing latency, and increase the bandwidth. We propose a new parallel genetic algorithm with elite and diverse cores for constructing wireless network virtual backbone based on finding MCDS of wireless nodes to be used in wireless network topology control. There are predefined number parallel workers, an elite core and a diverse core. All parallel components run genetic operators, and the elite core selects elite solutions among processed sub-population. On the other hand, diverse core looks for new solutions upon receiving elite solution in addition to received processed sub-population. Experimental results show that this algorithm gives better results compared to other methods, particularly for high dimension graph, which is the case in wireless sensor networks. Actually, using parallelism and featured elite and diverse search could help the proposed method to achieve 100% better results compared to its predecessor versions of sequential genetic algorithms. In addition to that, the algorithm is very stable as each result match the average result.

References

  1. James Edward Baker. Adaptive selection methods for genetic algorithms. In Proceedings of an International Conference on Genetic Algorithms and their applications, pages 101--111. Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Shankar M Banik and Sridhar Radhakrishnan. Minimizing broadcast latency in ad hoc wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 45th annual southeast regional conference, pages 533--534. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Paolo Casari and Albert F Harris. Energy-efficient reliable broadcast in underwater acoustic networks. In Proceedings of the second workshop on Underwater networks, pages 49--56. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Rodolfo WL Coutinho, Azzedine Boukerche, Luiz FM Vieira, and Antonio AF Loureiro. Gedar: geographic and opportunistic routing protocol with depth adjustment for mobile underwater sensor networks. In Communications (ICC), 2014 IEEE International Conference on, pages 251--256. IEEE, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Rodolfo WL Coutinho, Azzedine Boukerche, Luiz FM Vieira, and Antonio AF Loureiro. Underwater wireless sensor networks: A new challenge for topology control-based systems. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 51(1):19, 2018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Hongwei Du, Qiang Ye, Weili Wu, Wonjun Lee, Deying Li, Dingzhu Du, and Stephen Howard. Constant approximation for virtual backbone construction with guaranteed routing cost in wireless sensor networks. In INFOCOM, 2011 Proceedings IEEE, pages 1737--1744. IEEE, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Stefan Funke, Alexander Kesselman, Ulrich Meyer, and Michael Segal. A simple improved distributed algorithm for minimum cds in unit disk graphs. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN), 2(3):444--453, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Xiaofeng Gao, Xudong Zhu, Jun Li, Fan Wu, Guihai Chen, Ding-Zhu Du, and Shaojie Tang. A novel approximation for multi-hop connected clustering problem in wireless networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 25(4):2223--2234, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Xu Gong, David Plets, Emmeric Tanghe, Toon De Pessemier, Luc Martens, and Wout Joseph. An efficient genetic algorithm for large-scale planning of dense and robust industrial wireless networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 96:311--329, 2018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Abdel-Rahman Hedar, Rashad Ismail, Gamal A El Sayed, and Khalid M Jamil Khayyat. Two meta-heuristics for the minimum connected dominating set problem with an application in wireless networks. In Applied Computing and Information Technology/2nd International Conference on Computational Science and Intelligence (ACIT-CSI), 2015 3rd International Conference on, pages 355--362. IEEE, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Abdel-Rahman Hedar, Rashad Ismail, Gamal A. El-Sayed, and Khalid M. Jamil Khayyat. Two meta-heuristics designed to solve the minimum connected dominating set problem for wireless networks design and management. Submitted, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Francisco Herrera, Manuel Lozano, and Jose L. Verdegay. Tackling real-coded genetic algorithms: Operators and tools for behavioural analysis. Artificial intelligence review, 12(4):265--319, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Raka Jovanovic and Milan Tuba. Ant colony optimization algorithm with pheromone correction strategy for the minimum connected dominating set problem. Computer Science and Information Systems, 10(1):133--149, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Enan A Khalil and Suat Ozdemir. Prolonging stability period of cds based wsns. In Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), 2015 International, pages 776--781. IEEE, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Ruizhi Li, Shuli Hu, Jian Gao, Yupeng Zhou, Yiyuan Wang, and Minghao Yin. Grasp for connected dominating set problems. Neural Computing and Applications, pages 1--9, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Bei Liu, Wei Wang, Donghyun Kim, Deying Li, Jingyi Wang, Alade O Tokuta, and Yaolin Jiang. On approximating minimum 3-connected m-dominating set problem in unit disk graph. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 24(5):2690--2701, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Chuanwen Luo, Wenping Chen, Jiguo Yu, Yongcai Wang, and Deying Li. A novel centralized algorithm for constructing virtual backbones in wireless sensor networks. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2018(1):55, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Chuanwen Luo, Yongcai Wang, Jiguo Yu, Wenping Chen, and Deying Li. A new greedy algorithm for constructing the minimum size connected dominating sets in wireless networks. In International Conference on Wireless Algorithms, Systems, and Applications, pages 109--114. Springer, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Yannis Manolopoulos, Dimitrios Katsaros, and Alexis Papadimitriou. Topology control algorithms for wireless sensor networks: a critical survey. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies and Workshop for PhD Students in Computing on International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, pages 1--10. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Usama Mehboob, Junaid Qadir, Salman Ali, and Athanasios Vasilakos. Genetic algorithms in wireless networking: techniques, applications, and issues. Soft Computing, 20(6):2467--2501, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kais Mnif, Bo Rong, and Michel Kadoch. Virtual backbone based on mcds for topology control in wireless ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international workshop on Performance evaluation of wireless ad hoc, sensor, and ubiquitous networks, pages 230--233. ACM, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Jasaswi Prasad Mohanty, Chittaranjan Mandal, and Chris Reade. Distributed construction of minimum connected dominating set in wireless sensor network using two-hop information. Computer Networks, 123:137--152, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Milen Nikolov and Zygmunt J Haas. Towards optimal broadcast in wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 14(7):1530--1544, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Priyanka Rawat, Kamal Deep Singh, Hakima Chaouchi, and Jean Marie Bonnin. Wireless sensor networks: a survey on recent developments and potential synergies. The Journal of supercomputing, 68(1):1--48, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Yishuo Shi, Zhao Zhang, Yuchang Mo, and Ding-Zhu Du. Approximation algorithm for minimum weight fault-tolerant virtual backbone in unit disk graphs. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), 25(2):925--933, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Fahong Yu, Xiaoyun Xia, Wenping Li, Jiang Tao, Longhua Ma, and Zhao-quan Cai. Critical node identification for complex network based on a novel minimum connected dominating set. Soft Computing, 21(19):5621--5629, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Dingxing Zhang, Ming Xu, Wei Xiao, Junwen Gao, and Wenshen Tang. Minimization of the redundant sensor nodes in dense wireless sensor networks. In International Conference on Evolvable Systems, pages 355--367. Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jiao Zhou, Zhao Zhang, Shaojie Tang, Xiaohui Huang, Yuchang Mo, and Ding-Zhu Du. Fault-tolerant virtual backbone in heterogeneous wireless sensor network. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 25(6):3487--3499, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Parallel genetic algorithm with elite and diverse cores for solving the minimum connected dominating set problem in wireless networks topology control

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICFNDS '18: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems
        June 2018
        469 pages
        ISBN:9781450364287
        DOI:10.1145/3231053

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 June 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader