skip to main content
10.1145/3231622.3232505acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvinciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Application of Interactive Computer-Assisted Argument Extraction to Opinionated Social Media Texts

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 August 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The analysis of various opinions and arguments in textual data can be facilitated by automatic topic modeling methods; however, the exploration and interpretation of the resulting topics and terms may prove to be difficult to the analysts. Opinions, stances, arguments, topics, terms, and text documents are usually connected with many-to-many relationships for such tasks. Exploratory visual analysis with interactive tools can help the analysts to get an overview of the topics and opinions, identify particularly interesting documents, and describe main themes of various arguments. In our previous work, we introduced an interactive tool called Topics2Themes that was used for topic and theme analysis of vaccination-related discussion texts with a limited set of stance categories. In this poster paper, we describe an application of Topics2Themes to a different genre of data, namely, political comments from Reddit, and multiple sentiment and stance categories detected with automatic classifiers.

References

  1. Eric P. S. Baumer, David Mimno, Shion Guha, Emily Quan, and Geri K. Gay. 2017. Comparing Grounded Theory and Topic Modeling: Extreme Divergence or Unlikely Convergence? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68, 6 (June 2017), 1397--1410. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Wenwen Dou and Shixia Liu. 2016. Topic- and Time-Oriented Visual Text Analysis. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 36, 4 (July 2016), 8--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Carsten Görg, Zhicheng Liu, Jaeyeon Kihm, Jaegul Choo, Haesun Park, and John Stasko. 2013. Combining Computational Analyses and Interactive Visualization for Document Exploration and Sensemaking in Jigsaw. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 10 (Oct. 2013), 1646--1663.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. C.J. Hutto and Eric Gilbert. 2014. VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-Based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text. In Proceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM '14). https://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM14/paper/viewPaper/8109Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kostiantyn Kucher, Carita Paradis, and Andreas Kerren. 2018. The State of the Art in Sentiment Visualization. Computer Graphics Forum 37, 1 (Feb. 2018), 71--96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Maria Skeppstedt, Andreas Kerren, and Manfred Stede. 2018. Vaccine Hesitancy in Discussion Forums: Computer-Assisted Argument Mining with Topic Models. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 247 (2018), 366--370. Proceedings of the 29th Medical Informatics Europe Conference (MIE '18).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Maria Skeppstedt, Kostiantyn Kucher, Manfred Stede, and Andreas Kerren. 2018. Topics2Themes: Computer-Assisted Argument Extraction by Visual Analysis of Important Topics. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Visualization as Added Value in the Development, Use and Evaluation of Language Resources at LREC '18 (VisLR III). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Paris, France. http://lrec-conf.org/workshops/lrec2018/W16/summaries/2_W16.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Maria Skeppstedt, Vasiliki Simaki, Carita Paradis, and Andreas Kerren. 2017. Detection of Stance and Sentiment Modifiers in Political Blogs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech and Computer (SPECOM '17). Springer, 302--311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Parinaz Sobhani, Diana Inkpen, and Stan Matwin. 2015. From Argumentation Mining to Stance Classification. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Argumentation Mining. Association for Computational Linguistics, Denver, CO, 67--77. http://aclweb.org/anthology/W15-0509Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. John Stasko, Carsten Görg, and Zhicheng Liu. 2008. Jigsaw: Supporting Investigative Analysis through Interactive Visualization. Information Visualization 7, 2 (2008), 118--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Application of Interactive Computer-Assisted Argument Extraction to Opinionated Social Media Texts

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          VINCI '18: Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Visual Information Communication and Interaction
          August 2018
          135 pages
          ISBN:9781450365017
          DOI:10.1145/3231622

          Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 13 August 2018

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • poster
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate71of193submissions,37%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader