skip to main content
10.1145/3233756.3233932acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Incorporating AR into a Multimodal UI for an Artificial Pancreas: The interdisciplinary nature of integrating augmented reality (AR), sound, and touch into a user interface (UI) for diabetes patients with embedded control systems for an artificial pancreas (AP)

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 August 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper explores the emerging field of human-embedded medical technology and its accompanying need for innovative user experience (UX) design. Specifically, the paper argues that, in the medium term, augmented reality (AR) can effectively serve as one part of a multimodal user interface (UI) for diabetes patients with embedded control systems for an artificial pancreas (AP). The paper explores what types of cross-disciplinary information UX designers will need in order to incorporate AR into an effective multimodal interface for diabetes patients with an AP. Currently, researchers are developing methods to embed continuous glucose monitors (CGM), model predictive control (MPC) systems, and AP systems into diabetes patients to regulate their blood sugar levels [30]. Ideally, an embedded control in a wearable medical device would remove the need for users to interact with the system because the system would self-regulate. However, once embedded, not only will a physician/technician need to initialize and adjust the system, but, ethically and practically, patients will also need access to the system. In the medium-term future (5-10 years), AR-with its emphasis on cross-disciplinary design needs-shows promise for conveying visual information most effectively to the patient. This paper addresses the interdisciplinary nature of conveying user information for embedded medical devices because it demonstrates the need for UX designers to integrate recent advancements in healthcare research, medical technology, cross-disciplinary design theory (e.g. human factors and effective use theory), and the rapidly changing nature of human-computer interaction (HCI).

References

  1. Dieter Bohn. 2018. Intel made smart glasses that look normal: Exclusive first look at Vaunt, which uses retinal projection to put a display in your eyeball. The Verge. February 5. https://www.theverge.com/2018/2/5/16966530/intel-vaunt-smart-glasses-announced-ar-videoGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrew Burton-Jones and Camille Grange. 2013. From use to effective use: A representation theory perspective. Information Systems Research. 24 (3). September. 632--658.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 2017. Estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States. National Diabetes Statistics Report. http://www.diabetes.org/assets/pdfs/basics/cdc-statistics-report-2017.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. CDRH (Center for Devices and Radiological Health) HHS (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) FDA (Food and Drug Administration) ODE (Office of Device Evaluation). 2016. Applying human factors and usability engineering to medical devices: Guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration staff. February 3. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/.../UCM259760.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Wonchan Choi and Bengisu Tulu. 2017. Effective use of user interface and user experience in an mHealth application. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 3803--3812.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Steffi L. Colyer and Polly M. McGuigan. 2018. Textile electrodes embedded in clothing: A practical alternative to traditional surface electromyography when assessing muscle excitation during functional movements. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine.17. March. 101--109.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Josh Constine. 2017. Zuckerberg shows off Oculus gloves for typing in AR. TechCrunch, February 9. https://techcrunch.com/2017/02/09/oculus-gloves/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. R. Jordan Crouser, Lyndsey Franklin, Alex Endert and Kris Cook. 2017. Theoretical techniques for measuring the use of human effort in visual analytic systems. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 23 (1). January. 121-130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration). 2018. What is the pancreas? What is an artificial pancreas device system? https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/HomeHealthandConsumer/ConsumerProducts/ArtificialPancreas/ucm259548.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Wilbert O. Galitz. 2007. The essential guide to user interface design: An introduction to GUI design principles and techniques. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley Publishing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dave Gershgorn. 2015. Facebook CEO says telepathy is coming after virtual reality; Zuckerberg says you'll be able to share emotions virtually 'one day'. Popular Science. June 30. https://www.popsci.com/facebook-ceo-says-telepathy-coming-after-virtual-realityGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. David Goldman. 2014. Google to make smart contact lenses. CNN Money. January 17. http://money.cnn.com/2014/01/17/technology/innovation/google-contacts/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Meron Gribetz. 2016. A glimpse of the future through an augmented reality headset. TED Talks. April 11. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9ZOpQzjukY&t=6m49sGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Matthew G. Hanna, Ishtiaque Ahmed, Jeffrey Nine, Shyam Prajapati, and Liron Pantanowitz. 2018. Augmented reality technology using Microsoft HoloLens in anatomic pathology. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. 142. May. 638--644.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kendall Ho, Christopher Yao, and Helen Novak Lauscher. 2017. Health apps, wearables, and sensors: The advancing frontier of digital health. BC Medical Journal. 59 (10). December. 503--506.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Michio Kaku. 2011. Physics of the future: How science will shape human destiny and our daily lives by the Year 2100. NY: Doubleday. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ljilja Kascak, Claudia B. Rébola, Richard Braunstein and Jon A. Sanford. 2013. Icon design for user interface of remote patient monitoring mobile devices. Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Design of Communication. September 9. 77--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Leo Kobayashi, Xiao Chi Zhang, Scott A. Collins, Naz Karim, and Derek L. Merck. 2018. Exploratory application of augmented reality/mixed reality devices for acute care procedure training. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 19 (1). January. 158--164.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. LAFORGE Optical. 2018. Meet Shima. https://laforgeoptical.com/pages/meet-shimaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jason Lim. 2016. Vue could be the smart glasses you'll actually want to wear. Forbes. December 7. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jlim/2016/12/07/vue-could-be-the-smart-glasses-youll-actually-want-to-wear/#772bbdc18fd1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jonas Löwgren. 2007. Inspirational patterns for embodied interaction. Knowledge, Technology and Policy.20. 165--177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Medtronic. 2016. MiniMed 630G System User Guide. https://www.medtronicdiabetes.com/sites/default/files/ library/download-library/user-guides/MP6026157-011_b.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Medtronic. 2018. MiniMed 670G Insulin Pump System. https://www.medtronicdiabetes.com/products/minimed-670g-insulin-pump-systemGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Lisa Melonçon and Erin A. Frost. 2015. The rhetorics of health and medicine and its importance in communication design. Communication Design Quarterly (CDQ). 3 (4). August. 7--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Reuters. 2016. Sony filed a patent for video-recording contact lens: You could one day shoot video with the blink of an eye. Huffington Post. April 28. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/sony-contact-lens-camera_us_57220fc6e4b0f309baefd3f2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Noel E. Schaeffer. 2012. The role of human factors in the design and development of an insulin pump. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. 6 (2). March. 260--264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. David Canfield Smith, Charles Irby, Ralph Kimball, Bill Verplank and Eric Harslem. 1982. Designing the Xerox 'Star' user interface. BYTE Publications. April. 242--282.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. EunYoung Song. 2017. Brain-Computer Interface based Neuro-prosthetics. Duke SciPol. May 19. http://scipol.duke.edu/content/brain-computer-interface-based-neuro-prostheticsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. TimT. 2014. My early thoughts on the Tandem t:slim pump. TimT's Diabetic Life. October 20. http://mylifediabetic.blogspot.com/2014/10/my-early-thoughts-on-tandem-tslim-pump.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Stamatina Zavitsanou, Ankush Chakrabarty, Eyal Dassau and Francis J. Doyle III. 2016. Embedded control in wearable medical devices: Application to the artificial pancreas. Processes, 4 (35).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. M. Y. Zhao, S. K. Ong, and A. Y. C. Nee. 2016. An augmented reality-assisted therapeutic healthcare exercise system based on bare-hand interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 32 (9). 708--721Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGDOC '18: Proceedings of the 36th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication
    August 2018
    169 pages
    ISBN:9781450359351
    DOI:10.1145/3233756

    Copyright © 2018 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 3 August 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    SIGDOC '18 Paper Acceptance Rate44of65submissions,68%Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader