skip to main content
10.1145/3233756.3233937acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Developing a Content Strategy Course and Interdisciplinary Skills: A Teaching Case

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 August 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The content strategy course has gained more interest for inclusion in the technical communication curriculum. However, content strategy combines a range of interdisciplinary skills, and technical communication scholarship has only briefly discussed how best to teach content strategy and whether we should devote a standalone course to the topic. This teaching case describes a content strategy course that combines the necessary content strategy skills students require and demonstrates how future research on course development in this area could further guide the technical communication field.

References

  1. Dave Clark. 2016. Content strategy: An integrative literature review. IEEE Trans. on Prof. Commun. 59(1), 7--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Tatiana Batova, Rebekka Andersen, Carlos Evia, Matthew R. Sharp, and John Steward. 2016. Incorporating component content management and content strategy into technical communication curricula. Proceedings of SIGDOC Conference (September 23--24, 2016). ACM, Silver Spring, CO USA. 1--3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Laura Gonzales, Liza Potts, William Hart-Davidson, and Michael McLeod. 2016. Revising a content-management course for a content strategy world. IEEE Trans. on Prof. Commun. 59(1), 56--67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Kristina Halvorson and Melissa Rach. 2012. Content Strategy for the Web (2nd. ed.). New Riders, Berkeley, CA USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Rebekka Andersen. 2014. The emergence of content strategy work and recommended resources. Commun. Design. Q. 2(4), 6--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Eva Brumberger and Claire Lauer. 2015. The evolution of technical communication: An analysis of industry job postings. Tech. Commun. 62(4), 224--243. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/stc/tc/2015/00000062/00000004/art00002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Tatiana Batova and Rebekka Andersen. 2017. A systematic literature review of changes in roles/skills in component content management environments and implications for education. Tech. Commun. Q. 26(2), 173--200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Megan Casey. 2015. The Content Strategy Toolkit: Methods, Guidelines, and Templates for Getting Content Right. New Riders, Berkeley, CA USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Karen McGrane. 2015. Going Responsive. A Book Apart.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Becky Jo McShane. 2007. How to teach XML: A brief tutorial. Intercom 54(4), 20--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Becky Jo McShane. 2008. Why we should teach XML: An argument for technical acuity. In G. Pullman and B. Gu, Content management: Bridging the gap between theory and practice, 73--85. Baywood Publishing, Amityville, NY USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGDOC '18: Proceedings of the 36th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication
    August 2018
    169 pages
    ISBN:9781450359351
    DOI:10.1145/3233756

    Copyright © 2018 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 3 August 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    SIGDOC '18 Paper Acceptance Rate44of65submissions,68%Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader