skip to main content
10.1145/3233756.3233948acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Prototype Theory for Content Strategy Education: Training Content Strategists Within the Academy

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 August 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Technical communicators are increasingly utilizing content-focused technologies such as content management systems and component-based information architectures in their daily work to deliver technical content to non-specialist audiences. In the wake of this turn, content strategy becomes an important element of technical communication curricula as students and emerging professionals struggle to master new tools and best practices. Stemming from experiences teaching content strategy to undergraduate students, graduate students, and industry professionals, I present a prototype theory for content strategy education within the academy. The goal of the theory is to meld best practices gleaned from previous scholarship within the field of technical and professional sommunication, how-to books and articles from industry practitioners, and my own experience teaching content strategy.

References

  1. John Stelzer. 2017. You Had Me At "Goodbye": Post-Purchase Phase Is Key. Watson Customer Engagement. (February 2017). Retrieved April 2, 2018 from https://www.ibm.com/blogs/watson-customer-engagement/2017/02/08/goodbye-post-purchase-phase-key/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2018 Adobe Consumer Content Survey. (February 2018). Retrieved April 2, 2018 from: https://www.slideshare.net/adobe/2018-adobe-consumer-content-surveyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. G. Pullman and B. Gu (Eds.). 2008. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17, 1 (January 2008), 1--148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. T. Batova and R. Andersen (Eds.). 2015. Transactions on Professional Communication, 58, 3 (September 2015), 241--347.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. T. Batova and R. Andersen (Eds.). 2016. Transactions on Professional Communication, 59, 1 (March 2016), 1--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Halvorson, K., and Rach, M. 2012. Content Strategy for the Web. 2nd ed. New Riders, Berkeley, CA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Meghan Casey. 2015. The Content Strategy Toolkit: Methods, Guidelines, and Templates for Getting Content Right. New Riders, Berkeley, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. T. Frick and K. Eyler-Werve. 2015. Return on Engagement: Content Strategy and Web Design Techniques for Digital Marketing. 2nd ed. Focal Press, Burlington, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kristina Halvorson. 2008. The Discipline of Content Strategy. A List Apart. (December 2008). Retrieved April 2, 2018 from http://alistapart.com/article/thedisciplineofcontentstrategyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Rockley and C. Cooper. 2012. Managing Enterprise Content: A Unified Content Strategy. 2nd ed. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. L. Dush, G. Getto, S. Flanagan, and R. Thompson. 2016. Content strategy Service-Learning Partnerships With Nonprofit Organizations: A Guiding Heuristic and Overview of Deliverables. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication, No. 32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. T. Batova, R. Andersen, C. Evia, M. Sharp, and J. Stewart. 2016. Incorporating Component Content Management and Content Strategy into Technical Communication Curricula. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication, No. 35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Sara Wachter-Boettcher. 2012. Content Everywhere: Strategy and Structure for Future-Ready Content. Brooklyn, NY: Rosenfeld Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Guiseppe Getto. Module 3: A Content Strategy Plan Is a Roadmap for Delivering Content. Retrieved April 2, 2018 from http://www.guiseppegetto.com/engl7790/module-3/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Guiseppe Getto. Module 1: Content Strategy Is How We Write Publicly. Retrieved April 2, 2018 from http://www.guiseppegetto.com/engl7790/module-1-3/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Guiseppe Getto. Module 3: Digital Marketing. Retrieved April 2, 2018 from http://www.guiseppegetto.com/engl3040/module-3-6/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Guiseppe Getto. Module 3: Editing, Content Strategy, and Information Architecture. Retrieved April 2, 2018 from http://guiseppegetto.com/engl4780/module-3/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Guiseppe Getto. Dr. Guiseppe Getto's Digital Marketing Strategy Template. Retrieved April 2, 2018 from http://bit.ly/1M3Yd3UGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Steven Peters. 2016. 10 Free Content Strategy & Editorial Calendar Templates. (April 2016). Retrieved April 2, 2018 from https://builtvisible.com/content-strategy-editorial-calendar-templates/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Tatiana Batova. 2018. Negotiating Multilingual Quality in Component Content-Management Environments. Transactions on Professional Communication, 61, 1 (March 2018), 77--100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Huatong Sun. 2013. Cross-Cultural Technology Design: Creating Culture-Sensitive Technology for Local Users. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Scott Abel. 2011. 10 Tips for Writing International Technical Content. (July 2011). Retrieved April 2, 2018 from http://thecontentwrangler.com/2011/07/08/10-tips-for-writing-international-technical-content/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Bill Swallow. 2017. A Hierarchy of Localization Needs. (December 2017). Retrieved April 2, 2018 from https://www.scriptorium.com/2017/12/hierarchy-of-localization-needs/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. G. Getto and K. St. Amant. 2014. Designing Globally, Working Locally: Using Personas to Develop Online Communication Products for International Users. Communication Design Quarterly Review, 3, 1 (November 2016), 24--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Steve Portigal. 2013. Interviewing Users: How to Uncover Compelling Insights. Rosenfeld Media, Brooklyn, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. L. Potts and G. Bartocci. 2009. Experience Design. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication, 17--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Guiseppe Getto. Module 2: Contextual Inquiry and UX Strategy. Retrieved April 2, 2018 from http://www.guiseppegetto.com/engl7766ux/module-2/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Prototype Theory for Content Strategy Education: Training Content Strategists Within the Academy

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGDOC '18: Proceedings of the 36th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication
      August 2018
      169 pages
      ISBN:9781450359351
      DOI:10.1145/3233756

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 August 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGDOC '18 Paper Acceptance Rate44of65submissions,68%Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader