skip to main content
10.1145/3233756.3233949acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Best Paper

Games, UX, and the Gaps: Technical Communication Practices in an Amateur Game Design Community

Published:03 August 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Because professional game design processes and practices are often obfuscated, it is difficult for researchers to study how game design happens. In an effort to fill some of those gaps, this paper explores an amateur game design community with visible ongoing documentation practices. This research is meant to help establish cognates to professional game design practices in the service of building out the broader game design ecology. This discursive case study presents a way into a practice often closed off from technical communication scholars, UX specialists, and instructors attempting to train students in the daily work and technical communication practices of game design.

References

  1. Hadyn Taylor. 2017. Global gaming revenue on par with sports at $149bn for 2017. Retrieved November 30, 2017 from https://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2017-11-28-global-gaming-revenue-on-par-with-sports-following-2017-estimates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Julia Mason. 2013. Video games as technical communication ecology. Technical Communication Quarterly 22, 3 (January 2013), 219--237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Jason Schreier. 2017. Game designer says developers would be more candid if gamer culture wasn't so toxic. Retrieved November 9, 2017 from https://kotaku.com/game-designer-says-developers-would-be-more-candid-if-g-1818729507.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jennifer DeWinter and Stephanie Vie. 2016. Games in technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly 25, 3 (May 2016), 151--154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Ian Bogost. 2007. Persuasive Games: The Expressive Power of Video Games. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cody Reimer. Dialogic, data-driven design: UX and League of Legends. In Liza Potts and Michael Salvo (eds), Rhetoric and Experience Architecture. Parlor Press. Anderson, SC. (241--257).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Rudy McDaniel and Alice Daer. 2016. Developer discourse: Exploring technical communication practices within video game development. Technical Communication Quarterly 25, 3 (May 2016), 155--166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Michael Anthony DeAnda and Carly A. Kocurek. 2016. Game design as technical communication: Articulating game design through textbooks. Technical Communication Quarterly 25, 3 (May 2016), 202--210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Jim Kalbach. 2014. UX Debt: Borrowing From Your Users. Experiencing Information. Retrieved from https://experiencinginformation.com/2014/05/03/ux-debt-borrowing-from-your-users/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sergey Demyanov, James Bailey, Kotagiri Ramamohanarao, Christopher Leckie. 2015. Detection of deception in the Mafia party game. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI '15). ACM Press, New York, NY, 335--342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Matthew B. Miles, Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldaña. 2013. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Method Sourcebook. Sage Publications, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. James P. Gee. 2014. How To Do Discourse Analysis: A Toolkit. Routledge, Chicago, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Games, UX, and the Gaps: Technical Communication Practices in an Amateur Game Design Community

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGDOC '18: Proceedings of the 36th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication
      August 2018
      169 pages
      ISBN:9781450359351
      DOI:10.1145/3233756

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 August 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGDOC '18 Paper Acceptance Rate44of65submissions,68%Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader