skip to main content
10.1145/3233756.3233952acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Iteration for Impact: Exploring Design Thinking & Designing for Social Change in Client Projects

Published:03 August 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

This experience report outlines an experiential social justice-focused client project from an upper-level document design course embedded within a larger technical and professional communication (TPC) program. As our TPC classrooms continue to address the precarious social exigencies and cultural issues of writing for the public, our students need experience responding to such needs in their careers and communities. This report addresses this emerging trend by turning to the design thinking process as a scheme to aid TPC instructors in bringing social justice issues into their TPC assignments and curricula, particularly in working with client projects. The author provides lessons learned for TPC instructors involved with social justice-focused client projects, including the successes and shortcomings of employing the design thinking process alongside typical TPC genres such as white paper reports and usability testing of documentation.

References

  1. Brown, T. and Wyatt, J. 2010. Design thinking for social innovation. Development Outreach.12, 1 (July 2010), 29-43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Design Thinking Process. Graphic. Design Thinking Studio in Social Innovation. Elon University. Retrieved from blogs.elon.edu/innovationstudioGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Cass, J. (Feb. 2008). The Logo Design Process of Top Logo Designers. Just Creative. Retrieved March 3, 2018 from justcreative.com/2008/02/01/logo-design-process-of-top-graphic-designers/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Copley, R. "I Am a Man protest". 1968. Photograph.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Costanza-Chock, S. "Design Justice: Towards an intersectional feminist framework for design theory and practice." Proceedings from Design Research Society Catalyst. June 25-28, 2018:. 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Crenshaw, K. et al. #SayHerName: Resisting Police Brutality Against Black Women- a Social Media Guide. (May 2015). Retrieved from www.aapf.org/sayhername.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. IDEAOU. 2018. Design Thinking. Retrieved from https://www.ideaou.com/pages/design-thinkingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jones, N. N. 2016. The technical communicator as advocate: Integrating a social justice approach in technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication. 46, 3 (July 2016), 341--361.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Jones, N.N., Moore, K. R., and Walton, R. 2016. Disrupting the past to disrupt the future: An antenarrative of technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly. 25, 4 (Month Yr), 211 - 229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Lupton, E. 2010. Thinking with Type: A Critical Guide for Writers, Editors, and Students (2 nd ed). Princeton Architectural Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Quesenbery, W. 2004. Balancing the 5Es of usability. Cutter IT Journal. 17, 2 (Feb. 2004), 4- 11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Resnick, E. 2016. Developing Citizen Designers. Bloomsbury, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Shea, A. 2012. Designing for social change: Strategies for community-based graphic design. Princeton Architectural Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Sullivan, P. Beyond a narrow conception of usability testing. 1989. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. 32, 4 (Dec. 1989), 254--264.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Williams, R. 2015. The Non-Designer's Design Book (4 th ed). Peachpit Press, San Francisco.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Iteration for Impact: Exploring Design Thinking & Designing for Social Change in Client Projects

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGDOC '18: Proceedings of the 36th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication
      August 2018
      169 pages
      ISBN:9781450359351
      DOI:10.1145/3233756

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 August 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGDOC '18 Paper Acceptance Rate44of65submissions,68%Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader