Keshab R. Acharya
ABSTRACT
Successful task performance in a health or medical-related activity, especially in treating critical patients through biotechnology in resource-constrained settings, is determined by product usability that emphasizes the ease of use, error recovery, efficiency, and satisfaction. This means that technical products designed to be used in this context need to be efficient and easy to use. Research findings and suggestions laid out in this paper will highlight the importance of use context that allows for effective use of technological products across cultures. Successful patient treatments through biotechnology in resource-constrained settings and health communications are intrinsically connected to the concept of product usability. Such goals can be achieved through localized UX design practices that help users perform their desired tasks with speed, accuracy, and satisfaction, and thus promote social justice and inclusion in resource-constrained settings. Through a case study, this paper shares findings related to usability problems in technology transfer from industrialized nations to an underrepresented, underdeveloped country. The article provides implications of the findings, suggesting that designers in industrialized nations should consider how technological products designed through localized usability can be better positioned to be used for promoting social justice and human rights in the underserved, undeveloped countries.
- Jesse J. Garrett. 2011. The elements of user experience: User-centered design for the web and beyond (2nd. ed). Berkeley, CA: New Riders.Google Scholar
- Robert J. Johnson. 1998. User-centered technology: A rhetorical theory for computers and other mundane artifacts. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steve Krug. 2014. Don't make me think, revisited: A common sense approach to web usability. Berkeley, CA: New Riders. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jakob Nielsen. 1993. Usability engineering. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press Inc. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Donald A. Norman. 2013. The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. New York, NY: Basic books.Google Scholar
- Kirk St. Amant. 2017. Of scripts and prototypes: A two-part approach to user experience design for international contexts. Technical Communication, 64 (2), 113--125.Google Scholar
- Carol M. Barnum. 2002. Usability testing and research. New York, NY: Longman. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Joseph S. Dumas and Janice C. Redish. 1999. A practical guide to usability testing. Portland, OR: Intellect Books Google ScholarDigital Library
- Emma J. Rose. 2016. Design as advocacy: Using a human-centered approach to investigate the needs of vulnerable populations. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46 (4), 427--445.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sumana Harihareswara. 2015. User experience is a social justice issue. Code4Lib Journal 28. Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/10482.Google Scholar
- Douglas M. Walls. 2016. User experience in social justice contexts. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2987592.2987604 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kathy Charmaz. 2014. Constructing grounded theory (2nd. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Anselm L. Strauss. 1987. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Godwin Y. Agboka. 2013. Participatory localization: A social justice approach to navigating unenfranchised/disenfranchised cultural sites. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22 (1), 28--49.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Huatong Sun. 2006. The triumph of users: Achieving cultural usability goals with user localization. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15 (4), 457--481.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Godwin Y. Agboka. 2014. Decolonial methodologies: Social justice perspectives in intercultural technical communication research. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 44 (3), 297--327.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Huatong Sun. 2012. Cross-cultural technology design: Creating culture-sensitive technology for local users. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Huatong Sun and Guiseppe Getto. 2017. Localizing user experience: Strategies, practices, and techniques for culturally sensitive design. Technical Communication, 64 (2), 89--94.Google Scholar
- Rebecca Walton. 2013. Stakeholder flux: Participation in technology-based international development projects. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 27 (4), 409--435.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael J. Salvo. 2001. Ethics of engagement: User-centered design and rhetorical methodology. Technical Communication Quarterly, 10 (3), 273--290.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lynn Dombrowski. 2017. Socially just design and engendering social change. Interactions, 24 (4), 63--65. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barbara Mirel. 1996. Contextual inquiry and the representation of tasks. Journal of Computer Documentation, 20 (1), 14--21. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kirk St. Amant. 2017. Mapping the cultural context of care: An approach to patient-centered design in international contexts. Connexions • International Professional Communication Journal, 5 (1), 109--124.Google Scholar
- Kirk St. Amant. 2017. The cultural context of care in international communication design: A heuristic for addressing usability in international health and medical communication. Communication Design Quarterly, 5 (2), 62--70. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Godwin Y. Agboka. 2013. Thinking about social justice: Interrogating the international in international technical communication discourse. Connexions • International Professional Communication Journal, 1 (1), 29--38.Google Scholar
- Natasha N. Jones. 2016. The technical communicator as advocate: Integrating a social justice approach in technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46 (3), 342--361.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rebecca Walton. (2016). Supporting human dignity and human rights: A call to adopt the first principle of human-centered design. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46 (4), 402--426.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Natasha N. Jones, Gerald J. Savage, and Han Yu. 2014. Tracking our progress: Diversity in technical and professional communication programs. Programmatic Perspectives, 6 (1), 132--152.Google Scholar
- Christopher Andrews, Debra Burleson, Kristi Dunks, Kimberly Elmore, Carie S. Lambert, Brett Oppegaard and Gregory Zobel. 2012. A new method in user-centered design: Collaborative prototype design process (CPDP). Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 42 (2), 123--142.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert K. Yin. 2018. Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Amanda Coffey and Paul Atkinson. 1996. Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- John W. Creswell. 2014. Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th. ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
- Ann Light and Rosemary Luckin. 2008. Designing for social justice: People, technology, learning. Retrieved from http://www2.futurelab.org.uk/resources/documents/opening_education/Designing_for_Social_ Justice.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Barbara Mirel. 2002. Advancing a vision of usability. In Reshaping Technical Communication: New Directions and Challenges for the 21st Century, Barbara Mirel & Rachel Spilka (Eds.), (pp. 165--187). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Richard E. Ladner. 2015. Design for user empowerment. Interactions, 22 (2), 24--29. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon, and Sarah Fox. 2016. Social justice-oriented interaction design: Outlining key design strategies and commitments. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 656--671). New York, NY: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Godwin Y. Agboka. 2012. Liberating intercultural technical communication from "large culture" ideologies: Constructing culture discursively. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 42 (2), 159- 181.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anne Adams, Ann Blandford, and Peter Lunt. 2005. Social empowerment and exclusion: a case study on digital libraries. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 12 (2), 174--200. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kirk St. Amant. 2017. The cultural context of care in international communication design: A heuristic for addressing usability in international health and medical communication. Communication Design Quarterly, 5 (2), 62--70. Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
User-centeredness and usability in e-government: a reflection on a case study in Rwanda
eGose '17: Proceedings of the Internationsl Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in EurasiaWhile e-government is well-established in many developed countries, it looks new to many least developed countries despite the fact that they have been using ICTs for decades. By using examples from a case study in Rwanda, the current study aims at ...
Open data and its usability: an empirical view from the Citizen's perspective
Government legislation and calls for greater levels of oversight and transparency are leading public bodies to publish their raw datasets online. Policy makers and elected officials anticipate that the accessibility of open data through online ...
Usability in Local E-Government: Analysis of Turkish Metropolitan Municipality Facebook Pages
Social media use is on the rise throughout the world. Influenced by this trend, governments of all levels and sizes are establishing their social media like Facebook presence due to the communication and interaction capabilities that such a presence ...
Comments