skip to main content
10.1145/3234695.3240992acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Gaze Typing using Multi-key Selection Technique

Published:08 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Gaze typing for people with extreme motor disabilities like full body paralysis can be extremely slow and discouraging for daily communication. The most popular technique in gaze typing, known as dwell time typing, is based on fixation on every letter of the word for a fixed amount of time, to type the word. In this preliminary study, the goal was to test a new technique of gaze typing that requires fixating only on the first and the last letter of the word. Analysis of the data collected suggests that the newly described technique is 63% faster than dwell time typing for novices in gaze interaction, without influencing the error rate. Using this technique would have a tremendous impact on communication speed, comfort and working efficiency of people with disabilities.

References

  1. Päivi Majaranta, Ulla-Kaija Ahola, and Oleg ?pakov. 2009. Fast gaze typing with an adjustable dwell time. Proc. 27th Int. Conf. Hum. factors Comput. Syst. - CHI 09 (2009), 357. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Päivi Majaranta, I. Scott MacKenzie, Anne Aula, and Kari-Jouko Räihä. 2006. Effects of feedback and dwell time on eye typing speed and accuracy. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 5, 2 (2006), 199--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Martez E Mott, Shane Williams, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Meredith Ringel Morris. 2017. Improving Dwell-Based Gaze Typing with Dynamic, Cascading Dwell Times. Proc. 2017 CHI Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - CHI '17 (2017), 2558--2570. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Daniel Rough, Keith Vertanen, and Per Ola Kristensson. 2014. An evaluation of Dasher with a high-performance language model as a gaze communication method. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces - AVI '14, 169--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Marie Christine Rousseau, Karine Baumstarck, Marine Alessandrini, Véronique Blandin, Thierry Billette De Villemeur, and Pascal Auquier. 2015. Quality of life in patients with locked-in syndrome: Evolution over a 6-year period. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 10, 1 (2015), 4--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. David J. Ward, Alan F. Blackwell, and David J. C. MacKay. 2000. Dasher--a data entry interface using continuous gestures and language models. In Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology - UIST '00, 129--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Gaze Typing using Multi-key Selection Technique

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              ASSETS '18: Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility
              October 2018
              508 pages
              ISBN:9781450356503
              DOI:10.1145/3234695

              Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 8 October 2018

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • abstract

              Acceptance Rates

              ASSETS '18 Paper Acceptance Rate28of108submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader