skip to main content
10.1145/3234781.3234793acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiceegConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Compliance performance of a large local company to electronic commerce act of 2000 and data privacy act of 2012: a case study approach

Published:13 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Electronic commerce and data privacy have become a very important aspect of performing business in the Philippines. This research study aims to ascertain the compliance performance of a large local company to the Electronic Commerce Act of 2000 (R.A. 8792) and Data Privacy Act of 2012 (R.A. 10173). Through Outcome Pattern Matching, it has been determined that, though the company is fully compliant with the applicable sections of R.A. 8792, it is Partially Compliant (High) to R.A. 10173 with few challenge areas. Using Benchmarking Process, this research study also recommends factors that could improve the compliance performance of the company. The following dimensions should be considered: (1) spontaneous compliance, (2) control and (3) sanctions. Further, the company should take into account not just the legal aspects of the Republic Acts but also the value-based ethics and business case of compliance.

References

  1. Trochim, W. 1989. Outcome Pattern Matching and Program Theory, Eval. Progr. Plan., 12, 355--366.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Elmuti D. and Kathawala, Y. 1997. An Overview of Benchmarking Process: a Tool for Continuous Improvement and Competitive Advantage, Benchmarking Qual. Manag. Technol., 4, 4, 229--243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Congress of the Philippines, 2000. Electronic Commerce Act of 2000. Metro Manila, Philippines: Congress of the Philippines, 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Department of Trade and Industry Department of Budget and Management Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, 2000. Implementing Rules and Regulations of the Electronic Commerce Act.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Department of Trade and Industry, 2016. Philippine E-Commerce Roadmap.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. National Privacy Commission, 2016. Implementing Rules and Regulations of Data Privacy Act of 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Congress of the Philippines, 2012. Data Privacy Act of 2012. Metro Manila, Philippines: Congress of the Philippines.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. National Privacy Commission, 2017. National Privacy Commission Toolkit: A Guide for Management and Data Protection Officers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. OECD, 2010. Better Regulations in Europe Chapter 6 - Compliance, Enforcement, Appeals, 107--114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. OECD, 2000. Reducing the Risk of Policy Failure: Challenges of Regulatory Compliance, Public Manag. Comm., pp. 1--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. "About NACUA." {Online}. Available: http://www.nacua.org/about-nacua. {Accessed: 20-Mar-2018}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hansen, J., Myers, C., LLP Bart Schwartz, K., and Roach, R. 2011. The Case for Compliance Programs: The Legal and Policy Mandates NACUA CLE Program Introduction: The Case for Compliance, NACUA 2011 Fall CLE Work., no. November, 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Compliance performance of a large local company to electronic commerce act of 2000 and data privacy act of 2012: a case study approach

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEEG '18: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on E-commerce, E-Business and E-Government
      June 2018
      106 pages
      ISBN:9781450364904
      DOI:10.1145/3234781

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 June 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader