skip to main content
research-article

Exploring a Design Space of Graphical Adaptive Menus: Normal vs. Small Screens

Published:29 July 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Graphical Adaptive Menus are Graphical User Interface menus whose predicted items of immediate use can be automatically rendered in a prediction window. Rendering this prediction window is a key question for adaptivity to enable the end-user to efficiently differentiate predicted items from normal ones and to consequently select appropriate items. Adaptivity for graphical menus has been investigated more for normal screens, such as desktops, than for small screens, such as smartphones, where real estate imposes severe rendering constraints. To address this question, this article defines and explores a design space where graphical adaptive menus are structured based on Bertin’s eight visual variables (i.e., position, size, shape, value, color, orientation, texture, and motion) and their combination by comparing their rendering for small screens with respect to normal screens. Based on this design space, previously introduced graphical adaptive menus are revisited in terms of four stability properties (i.e., spatial, physical, format, and temporal), and new menu designs are introduced and discussed for both normal and small screens. The resulting set of graphical adaptive menu has been subject to a preference analysis from which a particular design emerged: the cloud menu, where predicted items are arranged in an adaptive tag cloud. We investigate empirically the effect of the cloud menu on the item selection time and the error rate with respect to a static menu and an adaptive linear menu. This article then suggests a set of usability guidelines for designers and practitioners to design graphical adaptive menus in general and cloud menus in particular.

References

  1. David Ahlström, Andy Cockburn, Carl Gutwin, and Pourang Irani. 2010. Why it’s quick to be square: Modelling new and existing hierarchical menu designs. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’10). ACM, New York, NY, 1371--1380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Khalid Al-Omar and Dimitrios Rigas. 2009. The effect of size of personalised menus on user satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 11th WSEAS International Conference on Mathematical Methods and Computational Techniques in Electrical Engineering (MMACTEE’09). World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS), 322--327. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1949006.1949062. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Liat Antwarg, Talia Lavie, Lior Rokach, Bracha Shapira, and Joachim Meyer. 2013. Highlighting items as means of adaptive assistance. Behav. Inform. Technol. 32, 8 (2013), 761--777. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Leena Arhippainen, Tapani Rantakokko, and Marika Tähti. 2005. Navigation with an adaptive mobile map-application: User experiences of gesture- and context-sensitiveness. In Ubiquitous Computing Systems, Hitomi Murakami, Hideyuki Nakashima, Hideyuki Tokuda, and Michiaki Yasumura (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, 62--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Siddhartha Asthana, Pushpendra Singh, and Amarjeet Singh. 2013. Exploring adverse effects of adaptive voice menu. In CHI’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’13). ACM, New York, NY, 775--780. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Gilles Bailly, Eric Lecolinet, and Laurence Nigay. 2008. Flower menus: A new type of marking menu with large menu breadth, within groups and efficient expert mode memorization. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI’08). ACM, New York, NY, 15--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gilles Bailly, Eric Lecolinet, and Laurence Nigay. 2016. Visual menu techniques. ACM Comput. Surv. 49, 4, Article 60 (Dec. 2016), 41 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gilles Bailly, Antti Oulasvirta, Timo Kötzing, and Sabrina Hoppe. 2013. MenuOptimizer: Interactive optimization of menu systems. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’13). ACM, New York, NY, 331--342. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Patrick Baudisch, Desney Tan, Maxime Collomb, Dan Robbins, Ken Hinckley, Maneesh Agrawala, Shengdong Zhao, and Gonzalo Ramos. 2006. Phosphor: Explaining transitions in the user interface using afterglow effects. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’06). ACM, New York, NY, 169--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2004. Designing interaction, not interfaces. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI’04). ACM, New York, NY, 15--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Benjamin B. Bederson. 2000. Fisheye menus. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’00). ACM, New York, NY, 217--225. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jacques Bertin. 1967. Sémiologie graphique. Mouton/Gauthier-Villars, Paris, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Matthias Bezold and Wolfgang Minker. 2010. A framework for adapting interactive systems to user behavior. J. Amb. Intell. Smart Environ. 2, 4 (Dec. 2010), 369--387. Retrieved from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2021081.2021084. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Matthias Bezold and Wolfgan Minker. 2011. Adaptive Multimodal Interactive Systems. Springer, Berlin, Germany. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. François Bodart, Anne-Marie Hennebert, Jean-Marie Leheureux, Isabelle Provot, Jean Vanderdonckt, and Giovanni Zucchinetti. 1996. Key Activities for a Development Methodology of Interactive Applications. Springer London, London, 109--134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sara Bouzit, Gaëlle Calvary, Denis Chêne, and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2016. Automated evaluation of menu by guidelines review. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, (RoCHI’16), Adrian Iftene and Jean Vanderdonckt (Eds.). Matrix Rom, 11--21. Retrieved from: http://rochi.utcluj.ro/proceedings/en/articles-RoCHI2016.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Sara Bouzit, Gaëlle Calvary, Denis Chêne, and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2016. A comparison of shortcut and step-by-step adaptive menus for smartphones. In Proceedings of the 30th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference (BCS-HCI’16) (Workshops in Computing), Shamal Faily, Nan Jiang, Huseyin Dogan, and Jacqui Taylor (Eds.). BCS. Retrieved from: http://ewic.bcs.org/content/ConWebDoc/56904. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Sara Bouzit, Gaëlle Calvary, Denis Chêne, and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2016. A design space for engineering graphical adaptive menus. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems (EICS’16). ACM, New York, NY, 239--244. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Sara Bouzit, Gaëlle Calvary, Denis Chêne, and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2017. Polymodal menus: A model-based approach for designing multimodal adaptive menus for small screens. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, EICS, Article 15 (June 2017), 19 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Sara Bouzit, Gaëlle Calvary, Joëlle Coutaz, Denis Chêne, Éric Petit, and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2017. The PDA-LPA design space for user interface adaptation. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS’17), Saïd Assar, Oscar Pastor, and Haralambos Mouratidis (Eds.). IEEE, 353--364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Sara Bouzit, Denis Chêne, and Gaëlle Calvary. 2014. From appearing to disappearing ephemeral adaptation for small screens. In Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: The Future of Design (OzCHI’14). ACM, New York, NY, 41--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Sara Bouzit, Denis Chêne, and Gaëlle Calvary. 2015. Evanescent adaptation on small screens. In Proceedings of the Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction (OzCHI’15). ACM, New York, NY, 62--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Ralph Allan Bradley and Milton E. Terry. 1952. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 39, 3/4 (1952), 324--345. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2334029.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Robert Bridle and Eric McCreath. 2005. Predictive menu selection on a mobile phone. In Proceedings of the Workshop W7 on Mining Spatio-temporal Data (ECML/PKDD’05). 327--329. Retrieved from: https://cs.anu.edu.au/ Eric.McCreath/papers/mining05.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Robert Bridle and Eric McCreath. 2006. Inducing shortcuts on a mobile phone interface. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’06). ACM, New York, NY, 327--329. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Nicolas Burny, Suzanne Kieffer, Nathan Magrofuoco, Jorge Luis Perez Medina, Paolo Roselli, and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2018. Feedup, feedback, and feedforward in curve mid-air 3D gestures. In Proceedings of CHI’18 Workshop on Mid-Air Haptics for Control Interfaces, M. Giordano, O. Georgiou, B. Dzidek, L. Corenthy, Jin Ryong Kim, S. Subramanian, and Stephen Brewster (Eds.). Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/198679.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Gaëlle Calvary, Joëlle Coutaz, David Thevenin, Quentin Limbourg, Laurent Bouillon, and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2003. A unifying reference framework for multi-target user interfaces. Interact. Comput. 15, 3 (2003), 289--308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. M. S. T. Carpendale. 2001. Considering Visual Variables as a Basis for Information Visualisation. University of Calgary, Faculty of Science, Calgary, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Andy Cockburn, Carl Gutwin, and Saul Greenberg. 2007. A predictive model of menu performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’07). ACM, New York, NY, 627--636. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Ph. Courcoux and M. Semenou. 1997. Preference data analysis using a paired comparison model. Food Qual. Pref. 8, 5 (1997), 353--358.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Charles-Eric Dessart, Vivian Genaro Motti, and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2012. Animated transitions between user interface views. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI’12). ACM, New York, NY, 341--348. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Bruno Dumas, María Solórzano, and Beat Signer. 2013. Design guidelines for adaptive multimodal mobile input solutions. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI’13), Michael Rohs, Albrecht Schmidt, Daniel Ashbrook, and Enrico Rukzio (Eds.). ACM, 285--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Leah Findlater and Joanna McGrenere. 2004. A comparison of static, adaptive, and adaptable menus. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’04). ACM, New York, NY, 89--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Leah Findlater and Joanna McGrenere. 2008. Impact of screen size on performance, awareness, and user satisfaction with adaptive graphical user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’08). ACM, New York, NY, 1247--1256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Leah Findlater, Karyn Moffatt, Joanna McGrenere, and Jessica Dawson. 2009. Ephemeral adaptation: The use of gradual onset to improve menu selection performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’09). ACM, New York, NY, 1655--1664. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Sebastian Fischer and Stephan Schwan. 2008. Adaptively shortened pull down menus: Location knowledge and selection efficiency. Behav. Inform. Technol. 27, 5 (2008), 439--444. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Jérémie Francone, Gilles Bailly, Eric Lecolinet, Nadine Mandran, and Laurence Nigay. 2010. Wavelet menus on handheld devices: Stacking metaphor for novice mode and eyes-free selection for expert mode. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI’10). ACM, New York, NY, 173--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Yusuke Fukazawa, Mirai Hara, Masashi Onogi, and Hidetoshi Ueno. 2009. Automatic mobile menu customization based on user operation history. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI’09). ACM, New York, NY, Article 50, 4 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Krzysztof Z. Gajos and Krysta Chauncey. 2017. The influence of personality traits and cognitive load on the use of adaptive user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’17). ACM, New York, NY, 301--306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Mary Czerwinski, Desney S. Tan, and Daniel S. Weld. 2006. Exploring the design space for adaptive graphical user interfaces. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI’06). ACM, New York, NY, 201--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Katherine Everitt, Desney S. Tan, Mary Czerwinski, and Daniel S. Weld. 2008. Predictability and accuracy in adaptive user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’08). ACM, New York, NY, 1271--1274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Saul Greenberg and Ian H. Witten. 1985. Adaptive personalized interfaces—A question of viability. Behav. Inform. Technol. 4, 1 (1985), 31--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Florian Heimerl, Steffen Lohmann, Simon Lange, and Thomas Ertl. 2014. Word cloud explorer: Text analytics based on word clouds. In Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’14). IEEE Computer Society, 1833--1842. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Tobias Hesselmann, Stefan Flöring, and Marwin Schmitt. 2009. Stacked half-pie menus: Navigating nested menus on interactive tabletops. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (ITS’09). ACM, New York, NY, 173--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Eric Horvitz. 1999. Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. In Proceedings of the CHI’99 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Marian G. Williams and Mark W. Altom (Eds.). ACM, 159--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Sheng-Cheng Huang, I-Fan Chou, and Randolph G. Bias. 2006. Empirical evaluation of a popular cellular phone’s menu system: Theory meets practice. J. Usabil. Studies 1, 2 (Feb. 2006), 91--108. Retrieved from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2835658.2835662. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Anthony Jameson, Silvia Gabrielli, and Antti Oulasvirta. 2009. Users’ preferences regarding intelligent user interfaces: Differences among users and changes over time. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’09). ACM, New York, NY, 497--498. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Iyad Khaddam, Sara Bouzit, Gaëlle Calvary, and Denis Chêne. 2016. MenuErgo: Computer-aided design of menus by automated guideline review. In Actes de la 28ième Conférence Francophone sur l’Interaction Homme-Machine (IHM’16). ACM, New York, NY, 36--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Iyad Khaddam and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2011. Flippable user interfaces for internationalization. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems (EICS’11). ACM, New York, NY, 223--228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Kyungdoh Kim, Robert W. Proctor, and Gavriel Salvendy. 2009. Menu design in cell phones: Use of 3D menus. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Part III: Ubiquitous and Intelligent Interaction. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 48--57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Thomas Kühme, Uwe Malinowski, and James D. Foley. 1993. Facilitating interactive tool selection by adaptive prompting. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, jointly organized with the ACM Conference on Human Aspects in Computing Systems (CHI’93), Stacey Ashlund, Kevin Mullet, Austin Henderson, Erik Hollnagel, and Ted N. White (Eds.). ACM, 149--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. John Lamping, Ramana Rao, and Peter Pirolli. 1995. A Focus+Context technique based on hyperbolic geometry for visualizing large hierarchies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’95). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, 401--408. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Talia Lavie and Joachim Meyer. 2010. Benefits and costs of adaptive user interfaces. Int. J. Human-Comput. Studies 68, 8 (2010), 508--524. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Dong-Seok Lee and Wan Chul Yoon. 2004. Quantitative results assessing design issues of selection-supportive menus. Int. J. Industr. Ergon. 33, 1 (2004), 41--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. H. Lee, Y. Choi, and Y. Kim. 2011. An adaptive user interface based on spatiotemporal structure learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC’11). 923--927.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Howard Levene. 1960. Robust tests for equality of variances. In Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling, Ingram Olkin and Harold Hotelling et al. (Eds.). Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA, 278--292.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Rensis Likert. 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psych. 22, 140 (1932), 55--. Retrieved from: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1933-01885-001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Steffen Lohmann, Jürgen Ziegler, and Lena Tetzlaff. 2009. Comparison of tag cloud layouts: Task-related performance and visual exploration. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT’09), Tom Gross, Jan Gulliksen, Paula Kotzé, Lars Oestreicher, Philippe Palanque, Raquel Oliveira Prates, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer Berlin, 392--404. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Víctor López-Jaquero, Jean Vanderdonckt, Francisco Montero Simarro, and Pascual González. 2007. Towards an extended model of user interface adaptation: The ISATINE framework. In Proceedings of the Conference on Engineering Interactive Systems (EIS’07) Joint Working Conferences, EHCI’07, DSV-IS’07, HCSE’07. Selected Papers (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Jan Gulliksen, Morten Borup Harning, Philippe A. Palanque, Gerrit C. van der Veer, and Janet Wesson (Eds.), Vol. 4940. Springer, 374--392.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Xiaoyang Mao, Yuji Hatanaka, Atsumi Imamiya, Yuki Kato, and Kentaro Go. 2000. Visualizing computational wear with physical wear. In Proceedings of the 6th ERCIM Workshop “User Interfaces for All” (UI4All’00), Pier-Luigi Emiliani and Constantine Stephanidis (Eds.).Retrieved from: http://ui4all.ics.forth.gr/UI4ALL-2000/files/Long_papers/Mao.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. C. Marshall, C. Nelson, and M. M. Gardiner. 1987. Robust tests for equality of variances. In Applying Cognitive Psychology to User-Interface Design, Design guidelines (Ed.). Wiley 8 Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Justin Matejka, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2013. Patina: Dynamic heatmaps for visualizing application usage. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13). ACM, New York, NY, 3227--3236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Mitsuhiro Matsumoto, Ryozo Kiyohara, Hidenori Fukui, Masayuki Numao, and Satoshi Kurihara. 2008. Proposition of the context-aware interface for cellular phone operations. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Networked Sensing Systems. 233--233.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Jeffrey Mitchell and Ben Shneiderman. 1989. Dynamic versus static menus: An exploratory comparison. SIGCHI Bull. 20, 4 (Apr. 1989), 33--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Jakob Nielsen and Jonathan Levy. 1994. Measuring usability: Preference vs. performance. Commun. ACM 37, 4 (Apr. 1994), 66--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Lauren Norrie and Roderick Murray-Smith. 2016. Investigating UI displacements in an adaptive mobile homescreen. Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact. 8, 3 (July 2016), 1--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Jungchul Park, Sung H. Han, Yong S. Park, and Youngseok Cho. 2007. Usability of adaptable and adaptive menus. In Usability and Internationalization. HCI and Culture, Nuray Aykin (Ed.). Springer, Berlin, 405--411. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Martin Pielot, Anastasia Kazakova, Tobias Hesselmann, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2012. PocketMenu: Non-visual menus for touch screen devices. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI’12). ACM, New York, NY, 327--330. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Antoine Ponsard, Kamyar Ardekani, Kailun Zhang, Frederic Ren, Matei Negulescu, and Joanna McGrenere. 2015. Twist and pulse: Ephemeral adaptation to improve icon selection on smartphones. In Proceedings of the 41st Graphics Interface Conference (GI’15). Canadian Information Processing Society, 219--222. Retrieved from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2788890.2788929. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Dimitrios Raptis, Nikolaos Tselios, Jesper Kjeldskov, and Mikael B. Skov. 2013. Does size matter?: Investigating the impact of mobile phone screen size on users’ perceived usability, effectiveness and efficiency. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI’13). ACM, New York, NY, 127--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Anne Roudaut, Gilles Bailly, Eric Lecolinet, and Laurence Nigay. 2009. Leaf menus: Linear menus with stroke shortcuts for small handheld devices. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human-Computer Interaction- (INTERACT’09), Tom Gross, Jan Gulliksen, Paula Kotzé, Lars Oestreicher, Philippe Palanque, Raquel Oliveira Prates, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, 616--619. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Krystian Samp and Stefan Decker. 2011. Visual search in radial menus. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human-Computer Interaction- (INTERACT’11), Pedro Campos, Nicholas Graham, Joaquim Jorge, Nuno Nunes, Philippe Palanque, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, 248--255. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Andrew Sears and Ben Shneiderman. 1994. Split menus: Effectively using selection frequency to organize menus. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 1, 1 (Mar. 1994), 27--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Choonsung Shin, Jin-Hyuk Hong, and Anind K. Dey. 2012. Understanding and prediction of mobile application usage for smart phones. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’12). ACM, New York, NY, 173--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Benjamin L. Somberg. 1987. A comparison of rule-based and positionally constant arrangements of computer menu items. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI/GI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems and Graphics Interface (CHI’87). ACM, New York, NY, 255--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Erum Tanvir, Jonathan Cullen, Pourang Irani, and Andy Cockburn. 2008. AAMU: Adaptive activation area menus for improving selection in cascading pull-down menus. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’08). ACM, New York, NY, 1381--1384. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Theophanis Tsandilas and M. C. Schraefel. 2005. An empirical assessment of adaptation techniques. In Proceedings of the CHI’05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’05). ACM, New York, NY, 2009--2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Jean Vanderdonckt. 1999. Computer-aided design of menu bar and pull-down menus for business oriented applications. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems, David J. Duke and Angel R. Puerta (Eds.). Springer, 84--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Jean Vanderdonckt, Sara Bouzit, Gaëlle Calvary, and Denis Chêne. 2018. Cloud menus: A circular adaptive menu for small screens. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’18). ACM, New York, NY, 317--328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Jean Vanderdonckt, Paolo Roselli, and Jorge Luis Pérez Medina. 2018. !FTL, an articulation-invariant stroke gesture recognizer with controllable position, scale, and rotation invariances. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI’18). 353--364. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Shelly Welch and Si-Jung Kim. 2013. Determining the effect of menu element size on usability of mobile applications. In Design, User Experience, and Usability. Web, Mobile, and Product Design, Aaron Marcus (Ed.). Springer Berlin, 740--749. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Janet L. Wesson, Akash Singh, and Bradley van Tonder. 2010. Can adaptive interfaces improve the usability of mobile applications? In Human-Computer Interaction, Peter Forbrig, Fabio Paternó, and Annelise Mark Pejtersen (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, 187--198.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Michelle Wiebe, Denise Y. Geiskkovitch, and Andrea Bunt. 2016. Exploring user attitudes towards different approaches to command recommendation in feature-rich software. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’16). ACM, New York, NY, 43--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Pavani Yalla and Bruce N. Walker. 2008. Advanced auditory menus: Design and evaluation of auditory scroll bars. In Proceedings of the 10th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Assets’08). ACM, New York, NY, 105--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Exploring a Design Space of Graphical Adaptive Menus: Normal vs. Small Screens

                  Recommendations

                  Comments

                  Login options

                  Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                  Sign in

                  Full Access

                  • Published in

                    cover image ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
                    ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems  Volume 10, Issue 1
                    Special Issue on IUI 2018
                    March 2020
                    347 pages
                    ISSN:2160-6455
                    EISSN:2160-6463
                    DOI:10.1145/3352585
                    Issue’s Table of Contents

                    Copyright © 2019 ACM

                    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                    Publisher

                    Association for Computing Machinery

                    New York, NY, United States

                    Publication History

                    • Published: 29 July 2019
                    • Accepted: 1 October 2018
                    • Revised: 1 August 2018
                    • Received: 1 May 2018
                    Published in tiis Volume 10, Issue 1

                    Permissions

                    Request permissions about this article.

                    Request Permissions

                    Check for updates

                    Qualifiers

                    • research-article
                    • Research
                    • Refereed

                  PDF Format

                  View or Download as a PDF file.

                  PDF

                  eReader

                  View online with eReader.

                  eReader

                  HTML Format

                  View this article in HTML Format .

                  View HTML Format