Abstract
Graphical Adaptive Menus are Graphical User Interface menus whose predicted items of immediate use can be automatically rendered in a prediction window. Rendering this prediction window is a key question for adaptivity to enable the end-user to efficiently differentiate predicted items from normal ones and to consequently select appropriate items. Adaptivity for graphical menus has been investigated more for normal screens, such as desktops, than for small screens, such as smartphones, where real estate imposes severe rendering constraints. To address this question, this article defines and explores a design space where graphical adaptive menus are structured based on Bertin’s eight visual variables (i.e., position, size, shape, value, color, orientation, texture, and motion) and their combination by comparing their rendering for small screens with respect to normal screens. Based on this design space, previously introduced graphical adaptive menus are revisited in terms of four stability properties (i.e., spatial, physical, format, and temporal), and new menu designs are introduced and discussed for both normal and small screens. The resulting set of graphical adaptive menu has been subject to a preference analysis from which a particular design emerged: the cloud menu, where predicted items are arranged in an adaptive tag cloud. We investigate empirically the effect of the cloud menu on the item selection time and the error rate with respect to a static menu and an adaptive linear menu. This article then suggests a set of usability guidelines for designers and practitioners to design graphical adaptive menus in general and cloud menus in particular.
- David Ahlström, Andy Cockburn, Carl Gutwin, and Pourang Irani. 2010. Why it’s quick to be square: Modelling new and existing hierarchical menu designs. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’10). ACM, New York, NY, 1371--1380. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Khalid Al-Omar and Dimitrios Rigas. 2009. The effect of size of personalised menus on user satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 11th WSEAS International Conference on Mathematical Methods and Computational Techniques in Electrical Engineering (MMACTEE’09). World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS), 322--327. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1949006.1949062. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Liat Antwarg, Talia Lavie, Lior Rokach, Bracha Shapira, and Joachim Meyer. 2013. Highlighting items as means of adaptive assistance. Behav. Inform. Technol. 32, 8 (2013), 761--777. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Leena Arhippainen, Tapani Rantakokko, and Marika Tähti. 2005. Navigation with an adaptive mobile map-application: User experiences of gesture- and context-sensitiveness. In Ubiquitous Computing Systems, Hitomi Murakami, Hideyuki Nakashima, Hideyuki Tokuda, and Michiaki Yasumura (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, 62--73. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Siddhartha Asthana, Pushpendra Singh, and Amarjeet Singh. 2013. Exploring adverse effects of adaptive voice menu. In CHI’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’13). ACM, New York, NY, 775--780. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gilles Bailly, Eric Lecolinet, and Laurence Nigay. 2008. Flower menus: A new type of marking menu with large menu breadth, within groups and efficient expert mode memorization. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI’08). ACM, New York, NY, 15--22. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gilles Bailly, Eric Lecolinet, and Laurence Nigay. 2016. Visual menu techniques. ACM Comput. Surv. 49, 4, Article 60 (Dec. 2016), 41 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gilles Bailly, Antti Oulasvirta, Timo Kötzing, and Sabrina Hoppe. 2013. MenuOptimizer: Interactive optimization of menu systems. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’13). ACM, New York, NY, 331--342. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Patrick Baudisch, Desney Tan, Maxime Collomb, Dan Robbins, Ken Hinckley, Maneesh Agrawala, Shengdong Zhao, and Gonzalo Ramos. 2006. Phosphor: Explaining transitions in the user interface using afterglow effects. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’06). ACM, New York, NY, 169--178. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2004. Designing interaction, not interfaces. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI’04). ACM, New York, NY, 15--22. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Benjamin B. Bederson. 2000. Fisheye menus. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’00). ACM, New York, NY, 217--225. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jacques Bertin. 1967. Sémiologie graphique. Mouton/Gauthier-Villars, Paris, France.Google Scholar
- Matthias Bezold and Wolfgang Minker. 2010. A framework for adapting interactive systems to user behavior. J. Amb. Intell. Smart Environ. 2, 4 (Dec. 2010), 369--387. Retrieved from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2021081.2021084. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matthias Bezold and Wolfgan Minker. 2011. Adaptive Multimodal Interactive Systems. Springer, Berlin, Germany. Google ScholarDigital Library
- François Bodart, Anne-Marie Hennebert, Jean-Marie Leheureux, Isabelle Provot, Jean Vanderdonckt, and Giovanni Zucchinetti. 1996. Key Activities for a Development Methodology of Interactive Applications. Springer London, London, 109--134.Google Scholar
- Sara Bouzit, Gaëlle Calvary, Denis Chêne, and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2016. Automated evaluation of menu by guidelines review. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, (RoCHI’16), Adrian Iftene and Jean Vanderdonckt (Eds.). Matrix Rom, 11--21. Retrieved from: http://rochi.utcluj.ro/proceedings/en/articles-RoCHI2016.php.Google Scholar
- Sara Bouzit, Gaëlle Calvary, Denis Chêne, and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2016. A comparison of shortcut and step-by-step adaptive menus for smartphones. In Proceedings of the 30th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference (BCS-HCI’16) (Workshops in Computing), Shamal Faily, Nan Jiang, Huseyin Dogan, and Jacqui Taylor (Eds.). BCS. Retrieved from: http://ewic.bcs.org/content/ConWebDoc/56904. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sara Bouzit, Gaëlle Calvary, Denis Chêne, and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2016. A design space for engineering graphical adaptive menus. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems (EICS’16). ACM, New York, NY, 239--244. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sara Bouzit, Gaëlle Calvary, Denis Chêne, and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2017. Polymodal menus: A model-based approach for designing multimodal adaptive menus for small screens. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, EICS, Article 15 (June 2017), 19 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sara Bouzit, Gaëlle Calvary, Joëlle Coutaz, Denis Chêne, Éric Petit, and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2017. The PDA-LPA design space for user interface adaptation. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS’17), Saïd Assar, Oscar Pastor, and Haralambos Mouratidis (Eds.). IEEE, 353--364.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sara Bouzit, Denis Chêne, and Gaëlle Calvary. 2014. From appearing to disappearing ephemeral adaptation for small screens. In Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: The Future of Design (OzCHI’14). ACM, New York, NY, 41--48. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sara Bouzit, Denis Chêne, and Gaëlle Calvary. 2015. Evanescent adaptation on small screens. In Proceedings of the Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction (OzCHI’15). ACM, New York, NY, 62--68. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ralph Allan Bradley and Milton E. Terry. 1952. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 39, 3/4 (1952), 324--345. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2334029.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert Bridle and Eric McCreath. 2005. Predictive menu selection on a mobile phone. In Proceedings of the Workshop W7 on Mining Spatio-temporal Data (ECML/PKDD’05). 327--329. Retrieved from: https://cs.anu.edu.au/ Eric.McCreath/papers/mining05.pdf.Google Scholar
- Robert Bridle and Eric McCreath. 2006. Inducing shortcuts on a mobile phone interface. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’06). ACM, New York, NY, 327--329. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nicolas Burny, Suzanne Kieffer, Nathan Magrofuoco, Jorge Luis Perez Medina, Paolo Roselli, and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2018. Feedup, feedback, and feedforward in curve mid-air 3D gestures. In Proceedings of CHI’18 Workshop on Mid-Air Haptics for Control Interfaces, M. Giordano, O. Georgiou, B. Dzidek, L. Corenthy, Jin Ryong Kim, S. Subramanian, and Stephen Brewster (Eds.). Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/198679.Google Scholar
- Gaëlle Calvary, Joëlle Coutaz, David Thevenin, Quentin Limbourg, Laurent Bouillon, and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2003. A unifying reference framework for multi-target user interfaces. Interact. Comput. 15, 3 (2003), 289--308.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. S. T. Carpendale. 2001. Considering Visual Variables as a Basis for Information Visualisation. University of Calgary, Faculty of Science, Calgary, Canada.Google Scholar
- Andy Cockburn, Carl Gutwin, and Saul Greenberg. 2007. A predictive model of menu performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’07). ACM, New York, NY, 627--636. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ph. Courcoux and M. Semenou. 1997. Preference data analysis using a paired comparison model. Food Qual. Pref. 8, 5 (1997), 353--358.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Charles-Eric Dessart, Vivian Genaro Motti, and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2012. Animated transitions between user interface views. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI’12). ACM, New York, NY, 341--348. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bruno Dumas, María Solórzano, and Beat Signer. 2013. Design guidelines for adaptive multimodal mobile input solutions. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI’13), Michael Rohs, Albrecht Schmidt, Daniel Ashbrook, and Enrico Rukzio (Eds.). ACM, 285--294. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Leah Findlater and Joanna McGrenere. 2004. A comparison of static, adaptive, and adaptable menus. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’04). ACM, New York, NY, 89--96. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Leah Findlater and Joanna McGrenere. 2008. Impact of screen size on performance, awareness, and user satisfaction with adaptive graphical user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’08). ACM, New York, NY, 1247--1256. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Leah Findlater, Karyn Moffatt, Joanna McGrenere, and Jessica Dawson. 2009. Ephemeral adaptation: The use of gradual onset to improve menu selection performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’09). ACM, New York, NY, 1655--1664. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sebastian Fischer and Stephan Schwan. 2008. Adaptively shortened pull down menus: Location knowledge and selection efficiency. Behav. Inform. Technol. 27, 5 (2008), 439--444. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jérémie Francone, Gilles Bailly, Eric Lecolinet, Nadine Mandran, and Laurence Nigay. 2010. Wavelet menus on handheld devices: Stacking metaphor for novice mode and eyes-free selection for expert mode. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI’10). ACM, New York, NY, 173--180. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yusuke Fukazawa, Mirai Hara, Masashi Onogi, and Hidetoshi Ueno. 2009. Automatic mobile menu customization based on user operation history. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI’09). ACM, New York, NY, Article 50, 4 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Krzysztof Z. Gajos and Krysta Chauncey. 2017. The influence of personality traits and cognitive load on the use of adaptive user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’17). ACM, New York, NY, 301--306. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Mary Czerwinski, Desney S. Tan, and Daniel S. Weld. 2006. Exploring the design space for adaptive graphical user interfaces. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI’06). ACM, New York, NY, 201--208. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Katherine Everitt, Desney S. Tan, Mary Czerwinski, and Daniel S. Weld. 2008. Predictability and accuracy in adaptive user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’08). ACM, New York, NY, 1271--1274. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Saul Greenberg and Ian H. Witten. 1985. Adaptive personalized interfaces—A question of viability. Behav. Inform. Technol. 4, 1 (1985), 31--45.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Florian Heimerl, Steffen Lohmann, Simon Lange, and Thomas Ertl. 2014. Word cloud explorer: Text analytics based on word clouds. In Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’14). IEEE Computer Society, 1833--1842. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tobias Hesselmann, Stefan Flöring, and Marwin Schmitt. 2009. Stacked half-pie menus: Navigating nested menus on interactive tabletops. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (ITS’09). ACM, New York, NY, 173--180. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eric Horvitz. 1999. Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. In Proceedings of the CHI’99 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Marian G. Williams and Mark W. Altom (Eds.). ACM, 159--166. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sheng-Cheng Huang, I-Fan Chou, and Randolph G. Bias. 2006. Empirical evaluation of a popular cellular phone’s menu system: Theory meets practice. J. Usabil. Studies 1, 2 (Feb. 2006), 91--108. Retrieved from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2835658.2835662. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anthony Jameson, Silvia Gabrielli, and Antti Oulasvirta. 2009. Users’ preferences regarding intelligent user interfaces: Differences among users and changes over time. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’09). ACM, New York, NY, 497--498. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Iyad Khaddam, Sara Bouzit, Gaëlle Calvary, and Denis Chêne. 2016. MenuErgo: Computer-aided design of menus by automated guideline review. In Actes de la 28ième Conférence Francophone sur l’Interaction Homme-Machine (IHM’16). ACM, New York, NY, 36--47. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Iyad Khaddam and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2011. Flippable user interfaces for internationalization. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems (EICS’11). ACM, New York, NY, 223--228. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kyungdoh Kim, Robert W. Proctor, and Gavriel Salvendy. 2009. Menu design in cell phones: Use of 3D menus. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Part III: Ubiquitous and Intelligent Interaction. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 48--57. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas Kühme, Uwe Malinowski, and James D. Foley. 1993. Facilitating interactive tool selection by adaptive prompting. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, jointly organized with the ACM Conference on Human Aspects in Computing Systems (CHI’93), Stacey Ashlund, Kevin Mullet, Austin Henderson, Erik Hollnagel, and Ted N. White (Eds.). ACM, 149--150. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Lamping, Ramana Rao, and Peter Pirolli. 1995. A Focus+Context technique based on hyperbolic geometry for visualizing large hierarchies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’95). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, 401--408. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Talia Lavie and Joachim Meyer. 2010. Benefits and costs of adaptive user interfaces. Int. J. Human-Comput. Studies 68, 8 (2010), 508--524. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dong-Seok Lee and Wan Chul Yoon. 2004. Quantitative results assessing design issues of selection-supportive menus. Int. J. Industr. Ergon. 33, 1 (2004), 41--52.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Lee, Y. Choi, and Y. Kim. 2011. An adaptive user interface based on spatiotemporal structure learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC’11). 923--927.Google Scholar
- Howard Levene. 1960. Robust tests for equality of variances. In Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling, Ingram Olkin and Harold Hotelling et al. (Eds.). Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA, 278--292.Google Scholar
- Rensis Likert. 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psych. 22, 140 (1932), 55--. Retrieved from: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1933-01885-001.Google Scholar
- Steffen Lohmann, Jürgen Ziegler, and Lena Tetzlaff. 2009. Comparison of tag cloud layouts: Task-related performance and visual exploration. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT’09), Tom Gross, Jan Gulliksen, Paula Kotzé, Lars Oestreicher, Philippe Palanque, Raquel Oliveira Prates, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer Berlin, 392--404. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Víctor López-Jaquero, Jean Vanderdonckt, Francisco Montero Simarro, and Pascual González. 2007. Towards an extended model of user interface adaptation: The ISATINE framework. In Proceedings of the Conference on Engineering Interactive Systems (EIS’07) Joint Working Conferences, EHCI’07, DSV-IS’07, HCSE’07. Selected Papers (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Jan Gulliksen, Morten Borup Harning, Philippe A. Palanque, Gerrit C. van der Veer, and Janet Wesson (Eds.), Vol. 4940. Springer, 374--392.Google Scholar
- Xiaoyang Mao, Yuji Hatanaka, Atsumi Imamiya, Yuki Kato, and Kentaro Go. 2000. Visualizing computational wear with physical wear. In Proceedings of the 6th ERCIM Workshop “User Interfaces for All” (UI4All’00), Pier-Luigi Emiliani and Constantine Stephanidis (Eds.).Retrieved from: http://ui4all.ics.forth.gr/UI4ALL-2000/files/Long_papers/Mao.pdf.Google Scholar
- C. Marshall, C. Nelson, and M. M. Gardiner. 1987. Robust tests for equality of variances. In Applying Cognitive Psychology to User-Interface Design, Design guidelines (Ed.). Wiley 8 Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Justin Matejka, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2013. Patina: Dynamic heatmaps for visualizing application usage. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13). ACM, New York, NY, 3227--3236. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mitsuhiro Matsumoto, Ryozo Kiyohara, Hidenori Fukui, Masayuki Numao, and Satoshi Kurihara. 2008. Proposition of the context-aware interface for cellular phone operations. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Networked Sensing Systems. 233--233.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jeffrey Mitchell and Ben Shneiderman. 1989. Dynamic versus static menus: An exploratory comparison. SIGCHI Bull. 20, 4 (Apr. 1989), 33--37. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jakob Nielsen and Jonathan Levy. 1994. Measuring usability: Preference vs. performance. Commun. ACM 37, 4 (Apr. 1994), 66--75. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lauren Norrie and Roderick Murray-Smith. 2016. Investigating UI displacements in an adaptive mobile homescreen. Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact. 8, 3 (July 2016), 1--17. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jungchul Park, Sung H. Han, Yong S. Park, and Youngseok Cho. 2007. Usability of adaptable and adaptive menus. In Usability and Internationalization. HCI and Culture, Nuray Aykin (Ed.). Springer, Berlin, 405--411. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Martin Pielot, Anastasia Kazakova, Tobias Hesselmann, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2012. PocketMenu: Non-visual menus for touch screen devices. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI’12). ACM, New York, NY, 327--330. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Antoine Ponsard, Kamyar Ardekani, Kailun Zhang, Frederic Ren, Matei Negulescu, and Joanna McGrenere. 2015. Twist and pulse: Ephemeral adaptation to improve icon selection on smartphones. In Proceedings of the 41st Graphics Interface Conference (GI’15). Canadian Information Processing Society, 219--222. Retrieved from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2788890.2788929. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dimitrios Raptis, Nikolaos Tselios, Jesper Kjeldskov, and Mikael B. Skov. 2013. Does size matter?: Investigating the impact of mobile phone screen size on users’ perceived usability, effectiveness and efficiency. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI’13). ACM, New York, NY, 127--136. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anne Roudaut, Gilles Bailly, Eric Lecolinet, and Laurence Nigay. 2009. Leaf menus: Linear menus with stroke shortcuts for small handheld devices. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human-Computer Interaction- (INTERACT’09), Tom Gross, Jan Gulliksen, Paula Kotzé, Lars Oestreicher, Philippe Palanque, Raquel Oliveira Prates, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, 616--619. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Krystian Samp and Stefan Decker. 2011. Visual search in radial menus. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human-Computer Interaction- (INTERACT’11), Pedro Campos, Nicholas Graham, Joaquim Jorge, Nuno Nunes, Philippe Palanque, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, 248--255. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andrew Sears and Ben Shneiderman. 1994. Split menus: Effectively using selection frequency to organize menus. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 1, 1 (Mar. 1994), 27--51. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Choonsung Shin, Jin-Hyuk Hong, and Anind K. Dey. 2012. Understanding and prediction of mobile application usage for smart phones. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’12). ACM, New York, NY, 173--182. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Benjamin L. Somberg. 1987. A comparison of rule-based and positionally constant arrangements of computer menu items. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI/GI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems and Graphics Interface (CHI’87). ACM, New York, NY, 255--260. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Erum Tanvir, Jonathan Cullen, Pourang Irani, and Andy Cockburn. 2008. AAMU: Adaptive activation area menus for improving selection in cascading pull-down menus. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’08). ACM, New York, NY, 1381--1384. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Theophanis Tsandilas and M. C. Schraefel. 2005. An empirical assessment of adaptation techniques. In Proceedings of the CHI’05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’05). ACM, New York, NY, 2009--2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jean Vanderdonckt. 1999. Computer-aided design of menu bar and pull-down menus for business oriented applications. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems, David J. Duke and Angel R. Puerta (Eds.). Springer, 84--99.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jean Vanderdonckt, Sara Bouzit, Gaëlle Calvary, and Denis Chêne. 2018. Cloud menus: A circular adaptive menu for small screens. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’18). ACM, New York, NY, 317--328. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jean Vanderdonckt, Paolo Roselli, and Jorge Luis Pérez Medina. 2018. !FTL, an articulation-invariant stroke gesture recognizer with controllable position, scale, and rotation invariances. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI’18). 353--364. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shelly Welch and Si-Jung Kim. 2013. Determining the effect of menu element size on usability of mobile applications. In Design, User Experience, and Usability. Web, Mobile, and Product Design, Aaron Marcus (Ed.). Springer Berlin, 740--749. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Janet L. Wesson, Akash Singh, and Bradley van Tonder. 2010. Can adaptive interfaces improve the usability of mobile applications? In Human-Computer Interaction, Peter Forbrig, Fabio Paternó, and Annelise Mark Pejtersen (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, 187--198.Google Scholar
- Michelle Wiebe, Denise Y. Geiskkovitch, and Andrea Bunt. 2016. Exploring user attitudes towards different approaches to command recommendation in feature-rich software. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’16). ACM, New York, NY, 43--47. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pavani Yalla and Bruce N. Walker. 2008. Advanced auditory menus: Design and evaluation of auditory scroll bars. In Proceedings of the 10th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Assets’08). ACM, New York, NY, 105--112. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Exploring a Design Space of Graphical Adaptive Menus: Normal vs. Small Screens
Recommendations
A design space for engineering graphical adaptive menus
EICS '16: Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing SystemsThis paper presents a design space for exploring design options of adaptive graphical menus based on Bertin's eight visual variables: position, size, shape, value, color, orientation, texture, and motion. In order to transform a traditional (static) ...
Exploring the design space for adaptive graphical user interfaces
AVI '06: Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfacesFor decades, researchers have presented different adaptive user interfaces and discussed the pros and cons of adaptation on task performance and satisfaction. Little research, however, has been directed at isolating and understanding those aspects of ...
Polymodal Menus: A Model-based Approach for Designing Multimodal Adaptive Menus for Small Screens
This paper presents a model-based approach for designing Polymodal Menus, a new type of multimodal adaptive menu for small screen graphical user interfaces where item selection and adaptivity are responsive to more than one interaction modality: a menu ...
Comments