skip to main content
10.1145/3239092.3239097acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Workshop on Designing Highly Automated Driving Systems as Radical Innovation

Published: 23 September 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Automated driving systems (ADS), especially in higher levels of automation, seem to be the new focus of innovation regarding future mobility. Technological achievements of traveling automation open up new challenges for road traffic. Existing automotive research focuses on problem solving and observational approaches including users and their imagination of the future of mobility to analyze acceptance and user experience of "incremental" (step-wised improved) innovations. On the other hand, "radical" (something new, enabled by technology or meaning change) innovations extensively increase product quality leaping over incremental innovation. This workshop aims to challenge the current research approaches to automated driving against "trying to improve sitting in a horse carriage" and discuss how we can design "radical" innovations for ADS beyond the "horse carriage". Within this interactive workshop, we will utilize a design thinking approach to refocus on underlying problems that ADSs originally aim to solve and generate ideas for radical innovations.

References

[1]
WIRED Brand Lab for Ford Motor Company. 2016. A Brief History of Autonomous Vehicle Technology. (Aug 2016). https://www.wired.com/brandlab/2016/03/a-brief-history-of-autonomous-vehicle-technology/
[2]
Anna-Katharina Frison, Bastian Pfleging, Andreas Riener, Myounghoon Philart Jeon, Ignacio Alvarez, and Wendy Ju. 2017a. Workshop on User-Centered Design for Automated Driving Systems. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct. ACM, 22--27.
[3]
Anna-Katharina Frison, Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Riener, and Clemens Schartmüller. 2017b. Driving Hotzenplotz: A Hybrid Interface for Vehicle Control Aiming to Maximize Pleasure in Highway Driving. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM, 236--244.
[4]
Renate Häuslschmid, Max von Bülow, Bastian Pfleging, and Andreas Butz. 2017. SupportingTrust in Autonomous Driving. In Proceedings of the 22Nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 319--329.
[5]
M. Kuderer, S. Gulati, and W. Burgard. 2015. Learning driving styles for autonomous vehicles from demonstration. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). 2641--2646.
[6]
Donald A. Norman and Roberto Verganti. 2014. Incremental and Radical Innovation: Design Research vs. Technology and Meaning Change. Design Issues 30, 1 (2014), 78--96.
[7]
Ingrid Pettersson and Wendy Ju. 2017. Design Techniques for Exploring Automotive Interaction in the Drive towards Automation. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 147--160.
[8]
Ingrid Pettersson and I.C. MariAnne Karlsson. 2015. Setting the stage for autonomous cars: a pilot study of future autonomous driving experiences. IET Intelligent Transport Systems 9, 7 (2015), 694--701.
[9]
Bastian Pfleging, Maurice Rang, and Nora Broy. 2016. Investigating User Needs for Non-Driving-Related Activities During Automated Driving. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA.
[10]
Christina Rödel, Susanne Stadler, Alexander Meschtscherjakov, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2014. Towards Autonomous Cars: The Effect of Autonomy Levels on Acceptance and User Experience. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 11, 8 pages.
[11]
SAE. 2013. Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice. (2013).
[12]
Albrecht Schmidt and Thomas Herrmann. 2017. Intervention user interfaces: a new interaction paradigm for automated systems. interactions 24, 5 (2017), 40--45.
[13]
Dehlia Willemsen, Arjan Stuiver, and Jeroen Hogema. 2014. Transition of Control: automation giving back control to the driver. Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation: Part I 7 (2014), 451.
[14]
Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Riener, and Anna-Katharina Frison. 2016. Automated Driving System, Male, or Female Driver: Who'D You Prefer? Comparative Analysis of Passengers' Mental Conditions, Emotional States & Qualitative Feedback. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Automotive'UI 16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 51--58.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
AutomotiveUI '18: Adjunct Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
September 2018
282 pages
ISBN:9781450359474
DOI:10.1145/3239092
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 September 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Automated Driving Systems
  2. Design Thinking
  3. Innovation
  4. SAE J3016
  5. User-Centered Design

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

AutomotiveUI '18
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 248 of 566 submissions, 44%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 148
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 10 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media