skip to main content
10.1145/3239576.3239608acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicaipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Effects of Intuition and Sensing in Programming Performance using MBTI personality model

Authors Info & Claims
Published:16 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we describe an empirical study carried out to investigate the effects of Intuition and Sensing personality types in programming performance using Myer-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) model. This formal experiment was conducted at Auburn University and participants were first-year students in an introductory programming course. Our results showed: (1) Intuition and Sensing personality traits did affect students' programming performance; (2) students with the Intuition type significantly wrote more efficient code that students with Sensing type; and (3) a significant linear correlation existed between Intuition and programming performance.

References

  1. Feldt, R., Angelis, L. and Samuelsson, M. 2008. Towards Individualized Software Engineering: Empirical Studies Should Collect Psychometrics. CHASE Workshop in Int'l Conference Software Engineer. 49--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Salleh, N., Mendes, E., Grundy, J. and Burch, G.S.J. 2009. An empirical study of the effects of personality in pair programming using the five-factor model. In: Proceedings of the 2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. IEEE Computer Society. 214--225. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Salleh, N., Mendes, E. and Grundy, J. 2010. Empirical Studies of Pair Programming for CS/SE Teaching in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. Vol. 37. 509--525. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Weinberg, G.M. The psychology of computer programming. 1971--1998, New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold. xv, 288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. I. Myers-Briggs, M. H. McCaulley, N. L. Quenk, and A. Hammer. 1998. MBTI Manual (A Guide to the Development and use of the Myers Briggs Type Indicator), 3rd edition Consulting Psychologists Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. McCrae, R.R. and John, O.P. 1992. An Introduction to the Five-Factor Model and Its Applications. Journal of Personality.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Calitz, A.P., Watson, M.B. and Kock, G. 1997. Identification and selection of successful future IT personnel in a changing technological and business environment. In: Proceedings of the 1997 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel research. 31--35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Charlton JP, Birkett PE (1999) An integrative model of factors related to computing course performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 20 (3):237--257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Nowaczyk, R.H. 1984. The relationship of problem-solving ability and course performance among novice programmers. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 21 (2):149--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Zahra, K. and Stefan, W. The influence of personality on computer programming: a summary of a systematic literature review. 2014. Publication Server of the University of Stuttgart.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Salleh, N., Mendes, E. and Grundy, J. 2010. Empirical Studies of Pair Programming for CS/SE Teaching in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. Vol. 37. 509--525 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Peslak, A.R. 2006. The Impact of Personality on Information Technology Team Projects", SIGMIS-CPR. 273--279 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Host, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B. and Wesslen, A. 2000. Experimentation in Software Eng.: An Introduction. Kluwer Academic Publisher. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. The Myers & Briggs Foundation. http://www.myersbriggs.org/my-mbti-personality-type/mbti-basics/home.htm?bhcp=1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Garcia-Mateos, G., and Fernandez-Aleman, J. L. 2009. A Course on Algorithms and Data Structures Using On-line Judging ABSTRACT. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 45--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Gulati, J., Bhardwaj, P., and Suri, B. 2015. Comparative Study of Personality Models in Software Engineering. In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Women in Computing and Informatics (WCI '15). Indu Nair (Ed.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 209--216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Karimi, Z., Baraani-Dastjerdi, A., Ghasem-Aghaee, N., and Wagner, S. 2015. Influence of Personality on Programming Styles an Empirical Study. Journal of Information Technology Research. 8(4).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Radermacher, A. D. and Walia, G. S. 2011. Investigating the effective implementation of pair programming: and empirical investigation. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 655--660. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Salleh, N., Mendes, E., Grundy, J., and Burch, G. J. 2010. The effects of neuroticism on pair programming: an empirical study in the higher education context. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA. Article 22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Salleh, N., Mendes, E., Grundy, J., and Burch, G. J. 2010. An empirical study of the effects of conscientiousness in pair programming using the five-factor personality model. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 1 (ICSE '10) Vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 577--586. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Salleh, N., Mendes, E., and Grundy, J. 2011. The effects of openness to experience on pair programming in a higher education context. Software Engineering Education Conference, Proceedings. 149--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Talhi, S. and Behaz, A. 2017. Using Learning Styles MBTI Model to Adapt Learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing for Engineering and Sciences (ICCES '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 92--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Howell, D. 2002. Pacific Grove: Duxbury Statistical Methods for Psychology. (5th ed.)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Benesty, J., Chen, J., Huang, Y. and Cohen, I. 2009. Pearson Correlation Coefficient. Noise Reduction in Speech Processing. Springer Topics in Signal Processing. 1--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Freund, R., Wilson, W., Sa, P. 2006. Regression Analysis. Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Effects of Intuition and Sensing in Programming Performance using MBTI personality model

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICAIP '18: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advances in Image Processing
      June 2018
      261 pages
      ISBN:9781450364607
      DOI:10.1145/3239576

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 June 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader