skip to main content
10.1145/3240117.3240123acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdtucConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Recommending Scientific Papers: The Role of Citation Contexts

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper addresses the problem of building recommender systems for scientific papers based on the linguistic and contextual analysis of citation contexts. We explain the importance of taking into consideration citation contexts and the different methodologies that exist as well as the ways that citations impact recommender systems. We also discuss the limits of using citation contexts to generate recommendations.

References

  1. Nitin Agarwal, Ehtesham Haque, Huan Liu, and Lance Parsons. 2005. Research paper recommender systems: A subspace clustering approach. In International Conference on Web-Age Information Management. Springer, 475--491. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Joeran Beel and Siddarth Dinesh. 2017. Real-World Recommender Systems for Academia: The Pain and Gain in Building, Operating, and Researching them.. In BIR@ ECIR. 6--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Joeran Beel, Bela Gipp, Stefan Langer, and Corinna Breitinger. 2016. paper recommender systems: a literature survey. International Journal on Digital Libraries 17, 4 (2016), 305--338. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Joeran Beel, Stefan Langer, Marcel Genzmehr, and Andreas Nürnberger. 2013. Introducing Docear's research paper recommender system. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries. ACM, 459--460. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Marc Bertin and Iana Atanassova. 2012. Semantic Enrichment of Scientific Publications and Metadata: Citation Analysis Through Contextual and Cognitive Analysis. D-lib Magazine 18, 7/8 (July/August 2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Marc Bertin and Iana Atanassova. 2014. A Study of Lexical Distribution in Citation Contexts through the IMRaD Standard, In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Bibliometric-enhanced Information Retrieval co-located with 36th European Conference on Information Retrieval (ECIR 2014). European Conference on Information Retrieval 1143, 5--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Marc Bertin and Iana Atanassova. 2015. Factorial Correspondence Analysis Applied to Citation Contexts, In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Bibliometric-enhanced Information Retrieval co-located with 37th European Conference on Information Retrieval (ECIR 2015). European Conference on Information Retrieval.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Marc Bertin and Iana Atanassova. 2018. InTeReC: In-text Reference Corpus -Single References Dataset.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Marc Bertin, Iana Atanassova, Vincent LariviÃĺre, and Yves Gingras. 2015. The Linguistic Context of Citations: a Cartography of the Structure of Scientific Papers. In AAAS Annual Meeting. American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Jose, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jesús Bobadilla, Fernando Ortega, Antonio Hernando, and Abraham Gutiérrez. 2013. Recommender systems survey. Knowledge-based systems 46 (2013), 109--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Toine Bogers, Klaas Kox, and Antal van den Bosch. 2008. Using citation analysis for finding experts in workgroups. In Proc. DIR. Citeseer, 21--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kurt D Bollacker, Steve Lawrence, and C Lee Giles. 2000. Discovering relevant scientific literature on the web. IEEE Intelligent Systems and their Applications 15, 2 (2000), 42--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Blaise Cronin. 1981. The need for a theory of citing. Journal of documentation 37, 1 (1981), 16--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Eugene Garfield and Alfred Welljams-Dorof. 1992. Citation data: their use as quantitative indicators for science and technology evaluation and policy-making. Science and Public Policy 19, 5 (1992), 321--327.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. C Lee Giles, Kurt D Bollacker, and Steve Lawrence. 1998. CiteSeer: Anautomatic citation indexing system. In Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Digital libraries. ACM, 89--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Bela Gipp, Jöran Beel, and Christian Hentschel. 2009. Scienstein: A research paper recommender system. In Proceedings of the international conference on emerging trends in computing (iceticâĂrŹ09). 309--315.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Marco Gori and Augusto Pucci. 2006. Research paper recommender systems: A random-walk based approach. In Web Intelligence, 2006. WI 2006. IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on. IEEE, 778--781. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. F Maxwell Harper, Xin Li, Yan Chen, and Joseph A Konstan. 2005. An economic model of user rating in an online recommender system. In International Conference on User Modeling. Springer, 307--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Qi He, Daniel Kifer, Jian Pei, Prasenjit Mitra, and C Lee Giles. 2011. Citation recommendation without author supervision. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. ACM, 755--764. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Qi He, Jian Pei, Daniel Kifer, Prasenjit Mitra, and Lee Giles. 2010. Context-aware citation recommendation. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web. ACM, 421--430. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Drahomira Herrmannova, Robert M Patton, Petr Knoth, and Christopher G Stahl. 2017. Citations and Readership are Poor Indicators of Research Excellence: Introducing TrueImpactDataset, a New Dataset for Validating Research Evaluation Metrics. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Scholarly Web Mining. ACM, 41--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Wenyi Huang, Saurabh Kataria, Cornelia Caragea, Prasenjit Mitra, C Lee Giles, and Lior Rokach. 2012. Recommending citations: translating papers into references. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, 1910--1914. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Wenyi Huang, Zhaohui Wu, Liang Chen, Prasenjit Mitra, and C Lee Giles. 2015. A Neural Probabilistic Model for Context Based Citation Recommendation.. In AAAI. 2404--2410. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Wenyi Huang, Zhaohui Wu, Prasenjit Mitra, and C Lee Giles. 2014. Refseer: A citation recommendation system. In Digital Libraries (JCDL), 2014 IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on. IEEE, 371--374. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Zan Huang, Wingyan Chung, Thian-Huat Ong, and Hsinchun Chen. 2002. A graph-based recommender system for digital library. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries. ACM, 65--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Onur Küçüktunç, Erik Saule, Kamer Kaya, and Ümit V Çatalyürek. 2012. Recommendation on academic networks using direction aware citation analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.1143 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Onur Küçüktunç, Erik Saule, Kamer Kaya, and Ümit V Çatalyürek. 2015. Diversifying citation recommendations. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 5, 4 (2015), 55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Joonseok Lee, Kisung Lee, and Jennifer G Kim. 2013. Personalized academic research paper recommendation system. arXiv preprint arXiv:1304.5457 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Yicong Liang, Qing Li, and Tieyun Qian. 2011. Finding relevant papers based on citation relations. In International Conference on Web-Age Information Management. Springer, 403--414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Haifeng Liu, Xiangjie Kong, Xiaomei Bai, Wei Wang, Teshome Megersa Bekele, and Feng Xia. 2015. Context-Based Collaborative Filtering for Citation Recommendation. IEEE Access 3, 1 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Avishay Livne, Vivek Gokuladas, Jaime Teevan, Susan T Dumais, and Eytan Adar. 2014. CiteSight: supporting contextual citation recommendation using differential search. In Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval. ACM, 807--816. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Pasquale Lops, Marco De Gemmis, and Giovanni Semeraro. 2011. Content-based recommender systems: State of the art and trends. In Recommender systems handbook. Springer, 73--105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Irina V Marshakova. 1973. System of document connections based on references. Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya Seriya 2-Informatsionnye Protsessy I Sistemy 6 (1973), 3--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Nikolaos F Matsatsinis, Kleanthi Lakiotaki, and P Delia. 2007. A system based on multiple criteria analysis for scientific paper recommendation. In Proceedings of the 11th Panhellenic conference on informatics. 135--149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Sean M McNee, Nishikant Kapoor, and Joseph A Konstan. 2006. Don't look stupid: avoiding pitfalls when recommending research papers. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 171--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Sean M McNee, John Riedl, and Joseph A Konstan. 2006. Being accurate is not enough: how accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems. In CHI'06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1097--1101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Fanqi Meng, Dehong Gao, Wenjie Li, Xu Sun, and Yuexian Hou. 2013. A unified graph model for personalized query-oriented reference paper recommendation. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management. ACM, 1509--1512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Stuart E Middleton, Harith Alani, and David C De Roure. 2002. Exploiting synergy between ontologies and recommender systems. arXiv preprint cs/0204012 (2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Stuart E Middleton, Nigel R Shadbolt, and David C De Roure. 2004. Ontological user profiling in recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 22, 1 (2004), 54--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Michael J Moravcsik and Poovanalingam Murugesan. 1975. Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social studies of science 5, 1 (1975), 86--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Cristiano Nascimento, Alberto HF Laender, Altigran S da Silva, and Marcos André Gonçalves. 2011. A source independent framework for research paper recommendation. In Proceedings of the 11th annual international ACM/IEEE joint conference on Digital libraries. ACM, 297--306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Deuk Hee Park, Hyea Kyeong Kim, Il Young Choi, and Jae Kyeong Kim. 2012. A literature review and classification of recommender systems research. Expert Systems with Applications 39, 11 (2012), 10059--10072. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Stefan Pohl, Filip Radlinski, and Thorsten Joachims. 2007. Recommending related papers based on digital library access records. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries. ACM, 417--418. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Siwipa Pruitikanee, Lisa Di Jorio, Anne Laurent, and Michel Sala. 2012. Paper recommendation system: A global and soft approach. In FUTURE COMPUTING'2012: Fourth International Conference on Future Computational Technologies and Applications. 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Xiang Ren, Jialu Liu, Xiao Yu, Urvashi Khandelwal, Quanquan Gu, Lidan Wang, and Jiawei Han. 2014. Cluscite: Effective citation recommendation by information network-based clustering. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 821--830. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Francesco Ricci, Lior Rokach, and Bracha Shapira. 2015. Recommender systems: introduction and challenges. In Recommender systems handbook. Springer, 1--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Arnab Sinha, Zhihong Shen, Yang Song, Hao Ma, Darrin Eide, Bo-june Paul Hsu, and Kuansan Wang. 2015. An overview of microsoft academic service (mas) and applications. In Proceedings of the 24th international conference on world wide web. ACM, 243--246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Henry Small. 1973. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for information Science 24, 4 (1973), 265--269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Henry Small. 1982. Citation context analysis. Progress in communication sciences (1982), 287--310.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Trevor Strohman, W Bruce Croft, and David Jensen. 2007. Recommending citations for academic papers. In Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 705--706. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Kazunari Sugiyama and Min-Yen Kan. 2010. Scholarly paper recommendation via user's recent research interests. In Proceedings of the 10th annual joint conference on Digital libraries. ACM, 29--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Kazunari Sugiyama and Min-Yen Kan. 2013. Exploiting potential citation papers in scholarly paper recommendation. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries. ACM, 153--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Jie Tang and Jing Zhang. 2009. A discriminative approach to topic-based citation recommendation. In Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Springer, 572--579. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Yonggang Wang, Ennan Zhai, Jianbin Hu, and Zhong Chen. 2010. Claper: Recommend classical papers to beginners. In Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), 2010 Seventh International Conference on, Vol. 6. IEEE, 2777--2781.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Jevin D West, Ian Wesley-Smith, and Carl T Bergstrom. 2016. A recommendation system based on hierarchical clustering of an article-level citation network. IEEE Transactions on Big Data 2, 2 (2016), 113--123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Howard D White. 2004. Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited. Applied linguistics 25, 1 (2004), 89--116.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Recommending Scientific Papers: The Role of Citation Contexts

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            DTUC '18: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Digital Tools & Uses Congress
            October 2018
            148 pages

            Copyright © 2018 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 3 October 2018

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • short-paper
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            DTUC '18 Paper Acceptance Rate26of46submissions,57%Overall Acceptance Rate48of88submissions,55%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader