skip to main content
10.1145/3240167.3240257acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing for experiences with socially interactive robots

Published:29 September 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Socially interactive technologies are emerging as one of the predominant technologies of the future. In this workshop, we aim to discuss the emerging field of Social Robotic technologies with a particular focus on interaction design methodologies used in the design process. The workshop will investigate how researchers have approached designing social robots and what we can learn from the interaction design field for future designs. The main activities of the workshop will encompass two interactive sessions and a discussion panel on approaches to inspire the design of socially interactive robots. In particular, we focus on experience-driven design methods involving rituals and memorable experiences with social robots.

References

  1. Beatrice Alenljung, Jessica Lindblom, Rebecca Andreasson, and Tom Ziemke. 2017. User Experience in Social Human-Robot Interaction. Int. J. Ambient Comput. Intell. 8, 2 (April 2017), 12--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2007. Methodology & Themes of Human-Robot Interaction: A Growing Research Field. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 4, 1 (2007), 103--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Julia Deneke, Darren Lehane, Alexandra Kandler, Tom Menchini, Mikael Laaksoharju, and Mohammad Obaid. 2017. Using Rapid Prototyping to Explore Design Implications for a Pill-Dispensing Social Agent. In Proceedings of the 5th Int. Conference on Human Agent Interaction (HAI '17). ACM, NY, USA, 53--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Terrence Fong, Illah Nourbakhsh, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2003. A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42, 3--4 (2003), 143--166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Guy Hoffman and Wendy Ju. 2014. Designing Robots with Movement in Mind. J. Hum.-Robot Interact. 3, 1 (Feb. 2014), 91--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Evangelos Karapanos, John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Jean-Bernard Martens. 2009. User Experience over Time: An Initial Framework. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, NY, USA, 729--738. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hee Rin Lee, JaYoung Sung, Selma Śabanović, and Joenghye Han. 2012. Cultural design of domestic robots: A study of user expectations in Korea and the United States. In The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2012. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Pierre Lévy. 2015. Exploring the challenge of designing rituals. In 6th Int. Congress of International Association of Societies of Design Research (IASDR 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Andrés Lucero and Juha Arrasvuori. 2010. PLEX Cards: A Source of Inspiration when Designing for Playfulness. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Fun and Games (Fun and Games '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 28--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Mohammad Obaid, Gökçe Elif Baykal, Asım Evren Yantaç, and Wolmet Barendregt. 2018. Developing a Prototyping Method for Involving Children in the Design of Classroom Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 10, 2 (2018), 279--291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Mohammad Obaid, Asım Evren Yantaç, Wolmet Barendregt, Güncel Kırlangıç, and Tilbe Göksun. 2016. Robo2Box: A Toolkit to Elicit Children's Design Requirements for Classroom Robots. In Social Robotics, Arvin Agah, John-John Cabibihan, Ayanna M. Howard, Miguel A. Salichs, and Hongsheng He (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 600--610.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Eduardo Benitez Sandoval, Omar Mubin, and Mohammad Obaid. 2014. Human Robot Interaction and Fiction: A Contradiction. In Social Robotics, Michael Beetz, Benjamin Johnston, and Mary-Anne Williams (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 54--63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Meg Tonkin, Jonathan Vitale, Sarita Herse, Mary-Anne Williams, William Judge, and Xun Wang. 2018. Design Methodology for the UX of HRI: A Field Study of a Commercial Social Robot at an Airport. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 407--415. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    NordiCHI '18: Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
    September 2018
    1002 pages
    ISBN:9781450364379
    DOI:10.1145/3240167

    Copyright © 2018 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 29 September 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    NordiCHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate59of240submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate379of1,572submissions,24%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader