skip to main content
10.1145/3240876.3240921acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicimcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Compressive hyperspectral imaging mask optimization

Published:17 August 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Hyperspectral imaging is a hot topic nowadays. It is an urgent problem to be solved how to achieve swift hyperspectral imaging. In this thesis, our primary purpose is to further optimize how to place a mask in front of a sensor in order to achieve compressed Hyperspectral imaging. We apply optimized projection matrix, matrix differential, projection analysis and other related knowledge to optimizing this realistic matter. After we simply introduce the background of hyperspectral imaging, we will firstly present the basic principle of compressed hyperspectral imaging based on mask, and then mainly analyze the way to achieve projection matrix optimizing algorithm and the challenges these sort of realistic problems face. Finally, we compare the experiment results of these two methods, and the rebuilding results before and after the optimizing.

References

  1. Robert W. Basedow. 1995. HYDICE system: implementation and performance. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering 2480, 1 (1995), 258--267.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Emmanuel J Candes and Terence Tao. 2005. Decoding by linear programming. IEEE transactions on information theory 51, 12 (2005), 4203--4215. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Chakrabarti and T. Zickler. 2011. Statistics of real-world hyperspectral images. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 193--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Hao Du, Xin Tong, Xun Cao, and Stephen Lin. 2010. A prism-based system for multispectral video acquisition. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 175--182.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Michael Elad. 2007. Optimized projections for compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 55, 12 (2007), 5695--5702. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Nahum Gat, Gordon Scriven, John Garman, Ming De Li, and Jingyi Zhang. 2006. Development of four-dimensional imaging spectrometers (4D-IS). In SPIE Optics+ Photonics. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 63020M--63020M.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ling Ge, Ran Ju, Tongwei Ren, and Gangshan Wu. 2015. Interactive RGB-D Image Segmentation Using Hierarchical Graph Cut and Geodesic Distance. In Pacific Rim Conference on Multimedia. 114--124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. ME Gehm, R John, DJ Brady, RM Willett, and TJ Schulz. 2007. Single-shot compressive spectral imaging with a dual-disperser architecture. Optics express 15, 21 (2007), 14013--14027.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. William R Johnson, Daniel W Wilson, and Greg Bearman. 2006. Spatial-spectral modulating snapshot hyperspectral imager. Applied optics 45, 9 (2006), 1898--1908.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Xing Lin, Yebin Liu, Jiamin Wu, and Qionghai Dai. 2014. Spatial-spectral encoded compressive hyperspectral imaging. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 33, 6 (2014), 233. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. X. Lin, G Wetzstein, Y. Liu, and Q. Dai. 2014. Dual-coded compressive hyperspectral imaging. Optics Letters 39, 7 (2014), 2044.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jing Liu, Tongwei Ren, Yuantian Wang, Sheng Hua Zhong, Jia Bei, and Shengchao Chen. 2016. Object proposal on RGB-D images via elastic edge boxes. Neurocomputing 236 (2016). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. Schonfeld and J. Goutsias. 1991. Optimal Morphological Pattern Restoration from Noisy Binary Images. Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History 7, 3 (1991), 225--244.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Y. Sun, Q. Liu, J. Tang, and D. Tao. 2014. Learning Discriminative Dictionary for Group Sparse Representation. IEEE Trans Image Process 23, 9 (2014), 3816--3828.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. J. Tang, Z. Li, M. Wang, and R. Zhao. 2015. Neighborhood Discriminant Hashing for Large-Scale Image Retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 24, 9 (2015), 2827--2840.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jiamin Wu, Xiong Bo, Lin Xing, Jijun He, Jinli Suo, and Qionghai Dai. {n. d.}. Snapshot Hyperspectral Volumetric Microscopy. Scientific Reports 6 ({n. d.}), 24624.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Xiangyang Xu, Yuncheng Li, Gangshan Wu, and Jiebo Luo. 2017. Multi-modal Deep Feature Learning for RGB-D Object Detection. Pattern Recognition 72 (2017). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Masahiro Yamaguchi, Hideaki Haneishi, Hiroyuki Fukuda, Junko Kishimoto, and Hiroshi Kanazawa. 2008. High-fidelity video and still-image communication based on spectral information: natural vision system and its applications. In Spectral Imaging: Eighth International Symposium on Multispectral Color Science. 60620G-60620G-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Daniel K. Zhou, Henry E. Revercomb, Allen M. Larar, Hung Lung Huang, and Bormin Huang. 2001. Hyperspectral remote sensing of atmospheric profiles from satellites and aircraft. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering 4151 (2001), 94--102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Compressive hyperspectral imaging mask optimization

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICIMCS '18: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Internet Multimedia Computing and Service
      August 2018
      243 pages
      ISBN:9781450365208
      DOI:10.1145/3240876

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 August 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      ICIMCS '18 Paper Acceptance Rate46of116submissions,40%Overall Acceptance Rate163of456submissions,36%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader