skip to main content
10.1145/3241748.3241776acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicebtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Proposing an Integrated Conceptual Framework for Understanding the Behavior of Using WeChat-Based EFL Learning Apps

Published: 05 July 2018 Publication History

Abstract

People have used a variety of social and mobile applications in language learning activities. WeChat-based English learning applications are constantly earning their popularity among Chinese English learners. However, we have still lacked understanding of how the applications work in influencing users' usage behavior. In order to investigate this issue, a theoretical analysis under the frameworks of the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior was conducted in the present study. Then, a conceptual framework that could be helpful for understanding the behavior of using WeChat-based English learning applications was proposed as the research findings. This theoretical analysis study will benefit future research in further exploration of mobile Apps with social features for English as foreign language learning.

References

[1]
Pindeh, N., Suki, N.M., and Suki, N.M. 2016. User acceptance on mobile Apps as an effective medium to learn Kadazandusun language. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 372--378.
[2]
Ma. Q. 2017. A multi-case study of university students' language-learning experience mediated by mobile technologies: a socio-cultural perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30, (Mar. 2017), 183--203.
[3]
Simonova. I. 2016. Mobile devices in technical and engineering education with focus on ESP. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 10, 33--40.
[4]
Stockwell, G., and Hubbard, P. 2013. Some emerging principles for mobile-assisted language learning, The International Research Foundation for English Language Education, 285--291.
[5]
Toetenel, L. 2014. Social networking: A collaborative open educational resource. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27, 149--162.
[6]
Teodorescu, A. 2015. Mobile learning and its impact on business English learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 180 (May. 2015), 1535--1540.
[7]
Oz, H. 2014. Prospective English Teachers' Ownership and Usage of Mobile Devices as M-learning Tools. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science. 141 (Aug. 2014), 1031--1041.
[8]
Chuang, Y.T. 2017. MEMIS: A Mobile-Supported English-Medium Instruction System. Telematics and Informatics. 34(May. 2017), 640--656.
[9]
Sandberg, J., Maris, M., and Geus, K.D. 2011. Mobile English learning: An evidence-based study with fifth graders. Computers & Education. 57(Aug, 2011), 1334--1347.
[10]
Cavus, N. 2016. Development of an Intelligent Mobile Application for Teaching English Pronunciation. Procedia Computer Science. 102, 365--369.
[11]
Godwin-Jones, R. 2011. Emerging technologies: Mobile apps for language learning. Language Learning & Technology. 15, 2--11.
[12]
Nooriafshar, M. 2012. Educational applications of the merging technologies available on handheld devices such as iPad and iPhone. Asian Journal of Management Sciences and Education. 1, 5--11.
[13]
Martinez, R. and Schmitt, N. 2010. Invited commentary: Vocabulary. Language Learning & Technology. 14, 26--29.
[14]
Kukulska-Hulme, A. 2009. Will mobile lewarning change language learning? ReCALL. 34, 157--165.
[15]
Basoglu, E.B. and Akdemir, O. A comparison of undergraduate students' English vovabulary learning: Using mobile phones and flash cards. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 72, 1--7.
[16]
Wang, H., Smyth, R., and Cheng, Z. 2017. The economic returns to proficiency in English in China. China Economic Rewiew. 43 (Apr, 2017), 91--104.
[17]
CNNIC. 2018. China Internet network information center report of 2018. Data retrieved from the website of http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201803/t20180305_70249.htm
[18]
Matemba, E.D. and Li, G. 2018. Consumers' willingness to adopte and use WeCht wallet: An empirical study in South Africa. Technology in Society. in press.
[19]
Liu, J. et al. 2018. Effects of using WeChat-assisted peroperative care instructions for parents of pediatric patients undergoing day surgery for herniorrhaphy. Patient Education and Counseling. in press.
[20]
Chen, L., Chin, F.G., Sun, Y., and Amran, R. 2017. Integrating guanxi into technology acceptance: An empirical investigation of WeChat. Telematics and Informatics. 34 (Nov. 2017), 1125--1142.
[21]
Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319--339.
[22]
Verman, S., Bhattacharyya, S.S., and Kumar, S. 2018. An extension of the technology acceptance model in the big data analytics system implementation environment. Information Processing & Management. in press.
[23]
Hussein, Z. 2017. Leading to intention: the role of attitude in relation to technology acceptance model in E-Learning. Procedia Computer Science. 105, 159--164.
[24]
Lee, Y., Kozar, K.A., and Larsen, K.R.T. 2003. The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 12, 752--780.
[25]
Ajzen, I. 2011. The theory of planned behavior. In Theory of planned behavior Handbook Theories of Social Psychology, Van Lange, P. A., Kruglanski, A.W., and Higgins, T.O., Ed. Sage Publications. London.
[26]
Cheung, M. and To, W.M. 2016. Service co-creation in social media: an extension of the theory of planned behavior. Computers in Human Behavior. 65 (Dec, 2016), 260--266.
[27]
Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S.M., and Song, J. 2012. An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education. 59 (Nov, 2012), 1054--1064.
[28]
Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management science. 42, 186--204.
[29]
Bargshady, G., Pourmahdi, K., Khodakarami, P., Khodadadi, T., and Alipanah, F. 2015. The effective factors on user acceptance in mobile business intelligence. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering). 72, 49--54.
[30]
Hansen, J.M, Saridakis, G., and Benson, V. 2018. Risk, trust, and the interaction of perceived ease of use and behavioral control in predicting consumers' use of social media for transactions. Computers in Human Behavior. 80 (Mar. 2018), 197--206.
[31]
Boyle, S.C., Earle, A. M., Labrie, J.W., and Smith, D.J. 2017. Pnf 2.0? Initial evidence that gamification can increase the efficacy of brief, web-based personalized normative feedback alcohol interventions. Addictive Behaviors. 67, 8--17.
[32]
Hamari, J. and Koivisto, J. 2015. Working out for likes': an empirical study on social influence in exercise gamification. Computers in Human Behavior. 50, 333--347.
[33]
Zhao, L., Lu, Y., Zhang, L., and Chau, P.Y. 2012. Assessing the effects of service quality and justice on customer satisfaction and the continuance intention of mobile value-added services: An empirical test of a multidimensional model. Decision Support Systems. 52, 645--656.
[34]
Szymanski, D.M. and Hise, R.T. 2000. E-satisfaction: an initial examination. Journal of Retailing. 76, 309--322.
[35]
Johnson, S.D., Aragon, S.R., and Shaik, N. 2000. Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research. 11, 29--49.
[36]
Heflin, H., Shewmaker, J., and Nguyen, J. 2017. Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning. Computers & Education. 107, 91--99.
[37]
Al-Emran, M., Elsherif, H.M., and Shaalan, K. 2016. Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior. 56, 93--102.
[38]
Echegaray, F. and Hansstein, F.V. 2016. Assessing the intention-behavior gap in electronic waste recycling: the case of Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production.142, 180--190.
[39]
Haia, A., Moulaa, M.E., and Seppäläa, U. 2017. Results of intention-behaviour gap for solar energy in regular residential buildings in Finland. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment. 5, 457--464.
[40]
Huda, H.M.J. and Zainuddin, H. 2015. Applying UTAUT to evaluate the acceptance of mobile learning in higher education in Iraq. International Journal of Science and Research. 4, 952--954.
[41]
Pai, F. and Yeh, T. 2014. The effects of information sharing and interactivity on the intention to use social networking websites. Quality and Quantity. 48, 2191--2207.
[42]
Trisha, T.C.L. and Li, L. 2014. Perceived characteristics, perceived pupularity, and playfulness: youth adoption of mobile instant messaging in China. China Media Research. 10, 60--71.
[43]
Chau, P.Y.K. 1996. An empirical investigation on factors affecting the acceptance of CASE by systems developers. Information Management. 30, 269--280.
[44]
Hu, P.J., Chau, P.Y.K., Sheng, O.R.L., and Tam, K.Y. 1999. Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information System. 16, 91--112.
[45]
Straub, D., Keil, M., and Brenner, W. 1997. Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: a three country study. Information Management. 33, 1--11.
[46]
Gefen, D., and Straub, D.W. 1997. Gender difference in the perception and use of E-mail: an extension to the technology acceptance model. Mis Quarterly. 21, 389--400.
[47]
Venkatesh, V. 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research. 11, 342--365.
[48]
Venkatesh, V. and Morris, M.G. 2000. Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. Mis Quarterly. 24, 115--139.
[49]
Chow, M., Herold, D.K., Choo, T.M., and Chan, K. 2012. Extending the technology acceptance model to explore the intention to use Second Life for enhancing healthcare education. Computer & Education. 59, 1136--1144.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)English proficiency as a performance of digital social capital: understanding how Chinese study abroad students use WeChat for the symbolic purpose of English language learningThe Journal of Chinese Sociology10.1186/s40711-022-00177-y9:1Online publication date: 25-Nov-2022

Index Terms

  1. Proposing an Integrated Conceptual Framework for Understanding the Behavior of Using WeChat-Based EFL Learning Apps

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEBT '18: Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on E-Education, E-Business and E-Technology
    July 2018
    202 pages
    ISBN:9781450364812
    DOI:10.1145/3241748
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    • Beijing University of Technology

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 05 July 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. EFL learning
    2. WeChat-based
    3. technology acceptance model
    4. theory of planned behavior

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ICEBT 2018

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)English proficiency as a performance of digital social capital: understanding how Chinese study abroad students use WeChat for the symbolic purpose of English language learningThe Journal of Chinese Sociology10.1186/s40711-022-00177-y9:1Online publication date: 25-Nov-2022

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media