skip to main content
10.1145/3242102.3242131acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Software-Defined Radio Analysis of the Impact of Dynamic Modulation Scaling within Low-Power Wireless Systems

Published:25 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Dynamic Modulation Scaling (DMS) is a well-known mechanism that can effectively exploit the tradeoff between communication time and energy consumption. In recent years a number of studies have suggested that DMS techniques can reduce energy consumption while maintaining performance objectives in low-power wireless transmission technologies such as those defined in IEEE 802.15.4. These studies tend to rely on theoretical or simulation DMS models to predict network performance metrics. However, there is little, if any, work that is based upon empirically verified network performance outcomes using DMS. This paper fills that gap. Our contribution is four-fold; first, using GNU~Radio and SDR hardware we show how to emulate DMS in low power wireless systems. Second, we measure the impact of varying Signal-to-Noise levels on throughput and delivery rates for different DMS control strategies. Third, using DMS we quantify the impact of distance and finally, we measure the impact of different elevations between sender and receiver on network performance. Our results provide an empirical basis for future work in this area.

References

  1. {n. d.}. https://forums.ni.com/t5/USRP-Software-Radio/How-to-set-the-trasmitpower-of-USRP/td-p/2202190. https://forums.ni.com/t5/USRP-Software-Radio/How-to-set-the-trasmit-power-of-USRP/td-p/2202190Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. IEEE 802.11p 2010 Standard. {n. d.}. IEEE 802.11p-2010. https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/its/current/pdfqf992dHy9x.pdf Last accessed on 2018-Feb-21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. IEEE 802.15.4e Standard. {n. d.}. https://standards.ieee.org/findstds/standard/802.15.4e-2012.html Last accessed on 2017-May-22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Giuseppe Anastasi, Marco Conti, Mario Di Francesco, and Andrea Passarella. 2009. Energy conservation in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Ad hoc networks 7, 3 (2009), 537--568. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. KR Damindra S Bandara, Anthony Melaragno, Duminda Wijesekera, and Paulo Costa. 2017. A case study of cognitive radio networks: Secure spectrum management for positive train control operations. In Spectrum Access and Management for Cognitive Radio Networks. Springer, 121--152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Maryam Bandari, Robert Simon, and Hakan Aydin. 2016. On minimizing expected energy usage of embedded wireless systems with probabilistic workloads. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems 11 (2016), 50--62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bastian Bloessl, Michele Segata, Christoph Sommer, and Falko Dressler. 2013. Towards an Open Source IEEE 802.11 p stack: A full SDR-based transceiver in GNU Radio. In Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC), 2013 IEEE. IEEE, 143--149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Alberto Cerpa and Deborah Estrin. 2002. Ascent: Adaptive self-configuring sensor network topologies. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 32, 1 (2002), 62--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Benjie Chen, Kyle Jamieson, Hari Balakrishnan, and Robert Morris. 2002. Span: An energy-efficient coordination algorithm for topology maintenance in ad hoc wireless networks. Wireless networks 8, 5 (2002), 481--494. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Shuguang Cui, Andrea J Goldsmith, and Ahmad Bahai. 2005. Energy-constrained modulation optimization. IEEE transactions on wireless communications 4, 5 (2005), 2349--2360. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Franz Edbauer. 1992. Bit error rate of binary and quaternary DPSK signals with multiple differential feedback detection. IEEE Transactions on Communications 40, 3 (1992), 457--460.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Benazir Fateh and Manimaran Govindarasu. 2013. Energy minimization by exploiting data redundancy in real-time wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks 11, 6 (2013), 1715--1731.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. B. Fateh and M. Govindarasu. 2015. Joint Scheduling of Tasks and Messages for Energy Minimization in Interference-aware Real-time Sensor Networks. Mobile Computing, IEEE Transactions on 14, 1 (2015), 86--98.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Arda Gumusalan, Robert Simon, and Hakan Aydin. 2016. Adaptive Transmission Scheduling for Energy-Aware Real-Time Wireless Communication. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks (EWSN '16). Junction Publishing, USA, 1--12. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2893711.2893713 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Arda Gumusalan, Robert Simon, and Hakan Aydin. 2018. Flexible Real-time Transmission Scheduling for Wireless Networks with Non-deterministic Workloads. Ad Hoc Networks (2018). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Paul Ho and Dominic Fung. 1991. Error performance of multiple symbol differential detection of PSK signals transmitted over correlated Rayleigh fading channels. In Communications, 1991. ICC'91, Conference Record. IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 568--574.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Texas Instruments. {n. d.}. Sub1GHz radios. http://www.ti.com/wireless-connectivity/simplelink-solutions/sub-1-ghz/products.html Last accessed on 2018-March-5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Tomas Lennvall, Stefan Svensson, and Fredrik Hekland. 2008. A comparison of WirelessHART and ZigBee for industrial applications. In Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Minyoung Park. 2015. IEEE 802.11 ah: sub-1-GHz license-exempt operation for the internet of things. IEEE Communications Magazine 53, 9 (2015), 145--151.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Ettus Research. {n. d.}. Ettus USRP B210. https://www.ettus.com/product/details/UB210-KIT Last accessed on 2018-Feb-22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Curt Schurgers, Vijay Raghunathan, and Mani B Srivastava. 2003. Power management for energy-aware communication systems. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems 2, 3 (2003), 431--447. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Jianping Song, Song Han, Aloysius K Mok, Deji Chen, Margaret Lucas, and Mark Nixon. 2008. WirelessHART: Applying wireless technology in real-time industrial process control. In Proceedings of IEEE Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. IEEE 802.15.4--2015 Standard. {n. d.}. https://standards.ieee.org/findstds/standard/802.15.4--2015.html Last accessed on 2018-Feb-21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Hai Wang and Abraham O Fapojuwo. 2017. A survey of enabling technologies of low power and long range machine-to-machine communications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 19, 4 (2017), 2621--2639.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Xiong Xiong, Kan Zheng, Rongtao Xu, Wei Xiang, and Periklis Chatzimisios. 2015. Low power wide area machine-to-machine networks: key techniques and prototype. IEEE Communications Magazine 53, 9 (2015), 64--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Yang Yu, Viktor K Prasanna, and Bhaskar Krishnamachari. 2006. Energy minimization for real-time data gathering in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 5, 11 (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Bo Zhang, Robert Simon, and Hakan Aydin. 2013. Harvesting-aware energy management for time-critical wireless sensor networks with joint voltage and modulation scaling. Industrial Informatics, IEEE Transactions on 9, 1 (2013), 514--526.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A Software-Defined Radio Analysis of the Impact of Dynamic Modulation Scaling within Low-Power Wireless Systems

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            MSWIM '18: Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems
            October 2018
            372 pages
            ISBN:9781450359603
            DOI:10.1145/3242102

            Copyright © 2018 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 25 October 2018

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate398of1,577submissions,25%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader