research-article

A study on developer perception of transformation languages for refactoring

Authors:

Christian D. Newman,

Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer,

Michael L. Collard,

Jonathan I. MaleticAuthors Info & Claims

IWoR 2018: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Refactoring

Pages 34 - 41

https://doi.org/10.1145/3242163.3242170

Published: 04 September 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Although there is much research advancing state-of-art of program transformation tools, their application in industry source code change problems has not yet been gauged. In this context, the purpose of this paper is to better understand developer familiarity and comfort with these languages by conducting a survey. It poses, and answers, four research questions to understand how frequently source code transformation languages are applied to refactoring tasks, how well-known these languages are in industry, what developers think are obstacles to adoption, and what developer refactoring habits tell us about their current use, or underuse, of transformation languages. The results show that while source code transformation languages can fill a needed niche in refactoring, research must motivate their application. We provide explanations and insights based on data, aimed at the program transformation and refactoring communities, with a goal to motivate future research and ultimately improve industry adoption of transformation languages for refactoring tasks.

References

[1]

M. Fowler, Refactoring: improving the design of existing code: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 1999.

Digital Library

[2]

M. L. Collard, J. I. Maletic, and B. P. Robinson, "A lightweight transformational approach to support large scale adaptive changes," presented at the Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2010.

Digital Library

[3]

S. Negara, N. Chen, M. Vakilian, R. E. Johnson, and D. Dig, "A comparative study of manual and automated refactorings," presented at the Proceedings of the 27th European conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Montpellier, France, 2013.

Digital Library

[4]

E. Murphy-Hill, C. Parnin, and A. P. Black, "How we refactor, and how we know it," presented at the Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Software Engineering, 2009.

Digital Library

[5]

E. Murphy-Hill and A. P. Black, "Refactoring Tools: Fitness for Purpose," IEEE Softw., vol. 25, pp. 38-44, 2008.

Digital Library

[6]

P. Klint, T. v. d. Storm, and J. Vinju, "RASCAL: A Domain Specific Language for Source Code Analysis and Manipulation," presented at the Proceedings of the 2009 Ninth IEEE International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation, 2009.

Digital Library

[7]

J. R. Cordy, "The TXL source transformation language," Sci. Comput. Program., vol. 61, pp. 190-210, 2006.

Digital Library

[8]

C. D. Newman, "A SOURCE CODE TRANSFORMATION LANGUAGE TO SUPPORT SOFTWARE EVOLUTION," Kent State University, 2017.

[9]

M. D. Jong and E. Visser, "Implementing Refactorings in the Spoofax Language Workbench," SERG Technical Report, pp. 1-19, 2013.

[10]

M. Kim, T. Zimmermann, and N. Nagappan, "An Empirical Study of Refactoring Challenges and Benefits at Microsoft," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering., vol. 40, pp. 633-649, 2014.

Digital Library

[11]

M. L. Collard, M. J. Decker, and J. I. Maletic, "srcML: An Infrastructure for the Exploration, Analysis, and Manipulation of Source Code: A Tool Demonstration," presented at the Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2013.

Digital Library

[12]

H. Li and S. Thompson, "Let's make refactoring tools user-extensible!," presented at the Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Refactoring Tools, Rapperswil, Switzerland, 2012.

Digital Library

[13]

N. Meng, M. Kim, and K. S. McKinley, "LASE: locating and applying systematic edits by learning from examples," presented at the Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Software Engineering, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2013.

Digital Library

[14]

R. Rolim, G. Soares, L. D'Antoni, O. Polozov, S. Gulwani, R. Gheyi, et al., "Learning syntactic program transformations from examples," presented at the Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Software Engineering, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2017.

Digital Library

[15]

N. Meng, M. Kim, and K. S. McKinley, "Sydit: creating and applying a program transformation from an example," presented at the Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSOFT symposium and the 13th European conference on Foundations of software engineering, Szeged, Hungary, 2011.

Digital Library

[16]

M. W. Mkaouer, M. Kessentini, S. Bechikh, K. Deb, and M. Ó Cinnéide, "Recommendation system for software refactoring using innovization and interactive dynamic optimization," in Proceedings of the 29th ACM/IEEE international conference on Automated software engineering, 2014, pp. 331- 336.

Digital Library

[17]

T. Mens, S. Demeyer, and D. Janssens, "Formalising Behaviour Preserving Program Transformations," Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002, pp. 286-301.

Digital Library

[18]

M. Vakilian, N. Chen, S. Negara, B. A. Rajkumar, B. P. Bailey, and R. E. Johnson, "Use, disuse, and misuse of automated refactorings," presented at the Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Software Engineering, Zurich, Switzerland, 2012.

Digital Library

[19]

G. Kniesel and H. Koch, "Static composition of refactorings," Sci. Comput. Program., vol. 52, pp. 9-51, 2004.

Digital Library

[20]

R. Moser, P. Abrahamsson, W. Pedrycz, A. Sillitti, and G. Succi, "A Case Study on the Impact of Refactoring on Quality and Productivity in an Agile Team," in Balancing Agility and Formalism in Software Engineering, M. Bertrand, R. N. Jerzy, and W. Bartosz, Eds., ed: Springer-Verlag, 2008, pp. 252-266.

Digital Library

[21]

F. Palomba, G. Bavota, M. D. Penta, R. Oliveto, and A. D. Lucia, "Do They Really Smell Bad? A Study on Developers' Perception of Bad Code Smells," presented at the Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution, 2014.

Digital Library

[22]

A. F. Yamashita and L. Moonen, "Do developers care about code smells? An exploratory survey," 2013 20th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering (WCRE), pp. 242-251, 2013.

[23]

L. C. L. Kats and E. Visser, "The spoofax language workbench: rules for declarative specification of languages and IDEs," SIGPLAN Not., vol. 45, pp. 444-463, 2010.

Digital Library

[24]

J. Lawall, G. Muller, and R. Urunuela, Tarantula: Killing Driver Bugs Before They Hatch, 2005.

[25]

Y. Padioleau, J. L. Lawall, and G. Muller, "SmPL: A Domain-Specific Language for Specifying Collateral Evolutions in Linux Device Drivers," Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci., vol. 166, pp. 47-62, 2007.

Digital Library

[26]

R. L. Akers, I. D. Baxter, and M. Mehlich, "Invited application paper: reengineering C++ components via automatic program transformation," presented at the Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGPLAN symposium on Partial evaluation and semantics-based program manipulation, Verona, Italy, 2004.

Digital Library

[27]

V. Augustine, "Automating adaptive maintenance changes with SrcML and LINQ," presented at the Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT 20th International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, Cary, North Carolina, 2012.

Digital Library

Cited By

Golubev YKurbatova ZAlOmar EBryksin TMkaouer MSpinellis DGousios GChechik MDi Penta M(2021)One thousand and one stories: a large-scale survey of software refactoringProceedings of the 29th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering10.1145/3468264.3473924(1303-1313)Online publication date: 20-Aug-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3468264.3473924
AlOmar EAlRubaye HMkaouer MOuni AKessentini M(2021)Refactoring Practices in the Context of Modern Code Review: An Industrial Case Study at Xerox2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP)10.1109/ICSE-SEIP52600.2021.00044(348-357)Online publication date: May-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEIP52600.2021.00044
Alomar EPeruma AMkaouer MNewman COuni A(2021)Behind the scenes: On the relationship between developer experience and refactoringJournal of Software: Evolution and Process10.1002/smr.2395Online publication date: 28-Oct-2021
https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2395
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

A study on developer perception of transformation languages for refactoring
1. General and reference
  1. Document types
    1. Surveys and overviews

Recommendations

The buggy side of code refactoring: understanding the relationship between refactorings and bugs
ICSE '18: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceeedings

Code refactoring is widely practiced by software developers. There is an explicit assumption that code refactoring improves the structural quality of a software project, thereby also reducing its bug proneness. However, refactoring is often applied with ...
A large-scale empirical exploration on refactoring activities in open source software projects
Highlights
- Developers do not refactor source code frequently.
- Developers adopt refactoring ...
Abstract
Refactoring is a well-established practice that aims at improving the internal structure of a software system without changing its external behavior. Existing literature provides evidence of how and why developers perform refactoring ...
A metric-based approach to identifying refactoring opportunities for merging code clones in a Java software system

A code clone is a code fragment that has other code fragments identical or similar to it in the source code. The presence of code clones is generally regarded as one factor that makes software maintenance more difficult. For example, if a code fragment ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

IWoR 2018: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Refactoring

September 2018

45 pages

ISBN:9781450359740

DOI:10.1145/3242163

Copyright © 2018 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGAI: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
CNRS: Centre National De La Rechercue Scientifique
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering
IEEE-CS: Computer Society

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 September 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

ASE '18

Sponsor:

SIGAI
CNRS
SIGSOFT
IEEE-CS

ASE '18: 33rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering

September 4, 2018

Montpellier, France

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

6
Total Citations
View Citations
105
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)8
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Golubev YKurbatova ZAlOmar EBryksin TMkaouer MSpinellis DGousios GChechik MDi Penta M(2021)One thousand and one stories: a large-scale survey of software refactoringProceedings of the 29th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering10.1145/3468264.3473924(1303-1313)Online publication date: 20-Aug-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3468264.3473924
AlOmar EAlRubaye HMkaouer MOuni AKessentini M(2021)Refactoring Practices in the Context of Modern Code Review: An Industrial Case Study at Xerox2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP)10.1109/ICSE-SEIP52600.2021.00044(348-357)Online publication date: May-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEIP52600.2021.00044
Alomar EPeruma AMkaouer MNewman COuni A(2021)Behind the scenes: On the relationship between developer experience and refactoringJournal of Software: Evolution and Process10.1002/smr.2395Online publication date: 28-Oct-2021
https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2395
AlOmar EPeruma ANewman CMkaouer MOuni A(2020)On the Relationship Between Developer Experience and RefactoringProceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops10.1145/3387940.3392193(342-349)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3387940.3392193
Bogart AAlOmar EMkaouer MOuni A(2020)Increasing the Trust In Refactoring Through VisualizationProceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops10.1145/3387940.3392190(334-341)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3387940.3392190
AlOmar EMkaouer MOuni A(2020)Toward the automatic classification of Self-Affirmed RefactoringJournal of Systems and Software10.1016/j.jss.2020.110821(110821)Online publication date: Sep-2020
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.110821

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten