Madison Klarkowski
ABSTRACT
Challenge plays a critical role in enabling an enjoyable and successful player experience, but not all dimensions of challenge are well understood. A more nuanced understanding of challenge and its role in the player experience is possible through assessing player psychophysiology. The psychophysiology of challenge (i.e. what occurs physiologically during experiences of video game challenge) has been the focus of some player experience research, but consensus as to the physiological markers of challenge has not been reached. To further explore the psychophysiological impact of challenge, three video game conditions -- varying by degree of challenge -- were developed and deployed within a large-scale psychophysiological study (n = 90). Results show decreased electrodermal activity (EDA) in the low-challenge (Boredom) video game condition compared to the medium- (Balance) and high-challenge (Overload) conditions, with a statistically non-significant but consistent pattern found between the medium- and high-challenge conditions. Overall, these results suggest electrodermal response increases with challenge. Despite the intuitiveness of some of these conclusions, the results do not align with extant literature. Possible explanations for the incongruence with the literature are discussed. Ultimately, with this work we hope to both enable a more complete understanding of challenge in the player experience, and contribute to a more granular understanding of the psychophysiological experience of play.
- Ernest Adams. 2014. Fundamentals of Game Design (3rd. ed.). New Riders, Berkley, CA. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Justin T. Alexander, John Sear, and Andreas Oikonomou. 2013. An investigation of the effects of game difficulty on player enjoyment. Entertainment Computing 4, 1: 53--62.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gustavo Andrade, Geber Ramalho, Alex Sandro Gomes, and Vincent Corruble. 2006. Dynamic game balancing: An evaluation of user satisfaction. The AAAI Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John L. Andreassi. 2007. Psychophysiology: Human Behavior & Physiological Response (5th ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ.Google Scholar
- Wolfram Boucsein. 1992. Electrodermal Activity. Plenum, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Jason J. Braithwaite, Derrick G. Watson, and Robert Jones. 2015. A Guide for Analysing Electrodermal Activity (EDA) & Skin Conductance Responses (SCRs) for Psychological Experiments. Retrieved from http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/documents/collegeles/psych/saal/guide-electrodermal-activity.pdfGoogle Scholar
- John T. Cacioppo, Louis G. Tassinary, and Gary G. Berntson. 2000. Psychophysiological science. In Handbook of Psychophysiology (2nd. ed.), John T. Cacioppo, Louis G. Tassinary, and Gary G. Berntson (eds.). Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 3--23.Google Scholar
- Keith Clements and Graham Turpin. 1995. Effects of feedback and task difficulty on electrodermal activity and heart rate: An examination of Fowles' three arousal model. Journal of Psychophysiology 9, 3: 231--242.Google Scholar
- Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 1990. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
- Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 1997. Finding Flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. Basic Books, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Michael E. Dawson, Anne M. Schell, and Diane L. Filion. 2000. The Electrodermal System. In Handbook of Psychophysiology (2nd. ed.), John T. Cacioppo, Louis G. Tassinary, and Gary G. Bernson (eds.). Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 200--223.Google Scholar
- Anders Drachen, Lennart E. Nacke, Georgios Yannakakis, and Anja Lee Pedersen. 2010. Correlation between heart rate, electrodermal activity and player experience in first-person shooter games. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games (Sandbox '10), 49--54. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stefan Engeser and Falko Rheinberg. 2008. Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance. Motivation and Emotion 32, 3: 158--172.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Carlton J. Fong, Diana J. Zaleski, and Jennifer Kay Leach. 2015. The challenge'skill balance and antecedents of flow: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Positive Psychology 10, 5: 1--22.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Guido Gendolla and Jan Krüsken. 2003. The joint impact of mood state and task difficulty on cardiovascular and electrodermal reactivity in active coping. Psychophysiology 38, 3: 548--556.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Carl Gutwin, Christianne Rooke, Andy Cockburn, Regan L. Mandryk, and Benjamin Lafreniere. 2016. Peak-End Effects on Player Experience in Casual Games. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 5608--5619. Google ScholarDigital Library
- László Harmat, Örjan de Manzano, Töres Theorell, Lennart Högman, Håkan Fischer and Fredrik Ullén. 2015. Physiological correlates of the flow experience during computer game playing. International Journal of Psychophysiology 97, 1: 1--7.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robin Hunicke and Vernell Chapman. 2004. AI for dynamic difficulty adjustment in games. In Proceedings of the 2004 Challenges in Game Artificial Intelligence AAAI Workshop, 91--96.Google Scholar
- Johannes Keller and Herbert Bless. 2008. Flow and Regulatory Compatibility: An Experimental Approach to the Flow Model of Intrinsic Motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34, 2: 196--209.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Johannes Keller, Herbert Bless, Frederik Blomann, and Dieter Kleinböhl. 2011. Physiological aspects of flow experiences: Skills-demand-compatibility effects on heart rate variability and salivary cortisol. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47, 4: 849--852.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Matias Kivikangas. 2006. Psychophysiology of Flow Experience: An Explorative Study. Master's thesis. University of Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
- J. Matias Kivikangas, Chanel Guillaume, Ben Cowley, Inger Ekman, Mikko Salminen, Simo Järvelä, and Niklas Ravaja. 2011. A review of the use of psychophysiological methods in game research. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds 3, 3: 181--199.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Madison Klarkowski, Daniel Johnson, Peta Wyeth, Mitchell McEwan, Cody Phillips, and Simon Smith. 2016. Operationalising and evaluating sub-optimal and optimal play experiences through challenge-skill manipulation. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 5583--5594. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christoph Klimmt, Christopher Blake, Dorothée Hefner, Peter Vorderer, and Christian Roth. 2009. Player Performance, Satisfaction, and Video Game Enjoyment. In Proceedings of the ICEC 2009 Conference on Entertainment Computing, 1--12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Julia Kneer, Malte Elson, and Florian Knapp. 2016. Fight fire with rainbows: The effects of displayed violence, difficulty, and performance in digital games on affect, aggression, and physiological arousal. Computers in Human Behavior 54: 142--148. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Derek Lomas, Kishan Patel, Jodi L. Forlizzi, and Kenneth R. Koedinger. 2013. Optimizing Challenge in an Educational Game Using Large-Scale Design Experiments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), 89--98. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Regan L. Mandryk, M. Stella Atkins, and Kori M. Inkpen. 2006. A continuous and objective evaluation of emotional experience with interactive play environments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), 1027--1036. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1124772.1124926 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Regan L. Mandryk, Kori M. Inkpen, and Thomas W. Calvert. 2006. Using psychophysiological techniques to measure user experience with entertainment technologies. Behaviour & Information Technology 25, 2: 141--158.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chase Meusel. 2014. Exploring mental effort and nausea via electrodermal activity within scenario-based tasks. Graduate thesis. Iowa State University, Iowa.Google Scholar
- Lennart E. Nacke. 2013. An Introduction to Physiological Player Metrics for Evaluating Games. In Game Analytics: Maximizing the Value of Player Data, Seif El-Nasr, Anders Drachen, and Alessandro Canossa (eds.). Springer London, London, UK, 585--619.Google Scholar
- Lennart E. Nacke and Craig A. Lindley. 2008. Flow and immersion in first-person shooters: measuring the player's gameplay experience. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Future Play: Research, Play, Share (Future Play '08), 81--88. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1496984.1496998 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nargess Nourbakhsh, Yang Wang, Fang Chen, and Rafael A. Calvo. 2012. Using galvanic skin response for cognitive load measurement in arithmetic and reading tasks. In Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference (OzChi '12), 420--423. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andrew K. Przybylski, C. Scott Rigby, and Richard M. Ryan. 2010. A motivational model of video game engagement. Review of General Psychology 14, 2: 154--166.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Niklas Ravaja, Marko Turpeinen, Timo Saari, Sampsa Puttonen, and Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen. 2008. The psychophysiology of James Bond: Phasic emotional responses to violent video game events. Emotion 8, 1: 114--120.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Falko Rheinberg, Regina Vollmeyer and Stefan Engeser. 2003. Die Erfassung des Flow-Erlebens {The assessment of flow experience}. In Diagnostik von Selbstkonzept, Lernmotivation und Selbstregulation {Diagnosis of Motivation and Self-Concept}, 261--279.Google Scholar
- Robert M. Stern, William J. Ray, and Karen S. Quigley. 2001. Psychophysiological Recording (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Kellie Vella, Daniel Johnson, and Leanne Hides. 2013. Positively playful: when videogames lead to player wellbeing. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications (Gamification '13), 99--102. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shaomei Wu and Tao Lin. 2011. Exploring the use of physiology in adaptive game design. In 2011 International Conference on Consumer Electronics, Communications and Networks (CECNet), 1280--1283.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Roberto Zangróniz, Arturo Martínez-Rodrigo, José Manuel Pastor, María T. López, and Antonio Fernández-Caballero. 2017. Electrodermal Activity Electrodermal Activity Sensor for Classification of Calm/Distress Condition. Sensors 17, 10.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Don't Sweat the Small Stuff: The Effect of Challenge-Skill Manipulation on Electrodermal Activity
Recommendations
Psychophysiology of Challenge in Play: EDA and Self-Reported Arousal
CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsMeasuring the video game player experience is a distinctly challenging task. As the experience of 'fun' in games is imprecise and multi-faceted, various psychological and experiential phenomena have been investigated in an effort to evaluate and ...
Correlation between heart rate, electrodermal activity and player experience in first-person shooter games
Sandbox '10: Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video GamesPsychophysiological methods are becoming more popular in game research as covert and reliable measures of affective player experience, emotions, and cognition. Since player experience is not well understood, correlations between self-reports from ...
“An Odd Kind of Pleasure”: Differentiating Emotional Challenge in Digital Games
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsRecent work introduced the notion of emotional challenge as a means to afford more unique and diverse gaming experiences. However, players' experience of emotional challenge has received little empirical attention. It remains unclear whether players ...
Comments