skip to main content
10.1145/3242840.3242856acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicacsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Airfoil Optimization based on Isogeometric Discontinuous Galerkin

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 July 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, an adjoint-based airfoil optimization algorithm is developed based on isogeometric discontinuous Galerkin (IDG) method for compressible Euler equations. We first parameterize the airfoil by B-spline curve approximation with some control points viewed as design variables, and build the B-spline representation of the flow field with the curve to apply global refined IDG method for flow solution. With the isogeometric nature, not only all the geometrical cells but also the numerical basis functions can be analytically expressed by the design variables. Consequently, the gradient involved in SQP optimization algorithm is totally estimated in an accurate approach indicating that the numerical solutions and objective could be differentiable with respect to those variables. The proposed algorithm is demonstrated on RAE2822 airfoil with inviscid transonic flow.

References

  1. Bijan Mohammadi. 2004. Optimization of aerodynamic and acoustic performances of supersonic civil transports, Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow 14, 7 (2004), 893--909.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Siva Nadarajah, Antony Jameson, and Juan Alonso. 2002. Sonic boom reduction using an adjoint method for wing-body configurations in supersonic flow, In Proceedings of the 9th AIAA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization (Atlanta, Georgia, September 04 - 06, 2002), AIAA, 5547.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Jamshid A. Samareh. 2001. Survey of shape parameterization techniques for high-fidelity multidisciplinary shape optimization, AIAA J. 39, 5 (May 2001), 877--884.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Wenbin Song, Andrew Keane. 2004. A study of shape parameterisation methods for airfoil optimisation, In Proceedings of the 10th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference (Albany, New York, August 30-September 1, 2004), AIAA, 4482.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Z.J. Wang, Krzysztof Fidkowski, and R5émi Abgrall, et al. 2013. High order CFD methods: current status and perspective, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 72, 8 (January 2013), 811--845.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Bernardo Cockburn, Chi-Wang Shu. TVB Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws. III. One-dimensional systems, Math. Comput. 84, 1 (September 1989), 90--113. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jorge Nocedal, Stephen J. Wright. 2006. Numerical optimization (2nd. ed.). Springer Verlag, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Antony Jameson. 1988. Aerodynamic design via control theory, J. Sci. Comput. 3, 3 (September 1988), 233--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Andreas Griewank, Andrea Walther. 2008. Evaluating derivatives: principles and techniques of algorithmic differentiation, Vol. 105. SIAM. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Andr5ás Sóbester, Alexander I. Forrester. 2014. Aircraft aerodynamic design: geometry and optimization, Wiley, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Shengjiao Yu, Renzhong Feng and Tiegang Liu. 2017. An isogeometric discontinuous galerkin method for Euler equations, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci. 40, 8 (May 2017), 3129--3139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Shengjiao Yu, Renzhong Feng, Huiqiang Yue, Zheng Wang, Tiegang Liu. 2018. Adjoint-based adaptive isogeometric discontinuous galerkin method for Euler equations, Adv. Appl. Math. Mech. 10, 3 (2018), 652--672.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Les Piegl, Wayne Tiller. 2012. The NURBS book, Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Chi-Wang Shu, Stanley Osher. 1988. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock capturing schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 77, 2 (August 1988), 439--471. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ralf Hartmann. 2002. Adaptive finite element methods for the compressible Euler equations, Ph.D. Dissertation, University Heidelberg, Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. P.-O. Persson, Jaime Peraire. 2008. Newton-GMRES preconditioning for discontinuous Galerkin discretizations of the Navier Stokes equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 30, 6 (2008), 2709--2733. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Gang Xu, Bernard Mourrain, R5égis Duvigneau and André Galligo. 2011. Parameter-ization of computational domain in isogeometric analysis: methods and comparison, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 200, 23-24 (June 2011), 2021--2031.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Kun Wang, Shengjiao Yu, Zheng Wang, Renzhong Feng and Tiegang Liu. 2018. Adjoint-based airfoil optimization with adaptive isogeometric discontinuous Galerkin method, In preparation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jé, r-iuml, me Lé, pine, Fran-atilde, ois Guibault, Jean-Yves. Tré, panier, Fran-atilde, ois Pé and pin. 2001. Optimized nonuniform rational b-spline geometrical representation for aerodynamic design of wings, AIAA J. 39, 11 (November 2001), 2033--2041.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ralf Hartmann. 2006. Adaptive discontinuous galerkin methods with shock capturing for the compressible navier-stokes equations, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 51, 9-10 (December 2006), 1131- 1156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Airfoil Optimization based on Isogeometric Discontinuous Galerkin

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICACS '18: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Systems
      July 2018
      245 pages
      ISBN:9781450365093
      DOI:10.1145/3242840

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 July 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader