skip to main content
research-article

Al-light: An Alcohol-Sensing Smart Ice Cube

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 September 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Inappropriate alcohol drinking may cause health and social problems. Although controlling the intake of alcohol is effective to solve the problem, it is laborious to track consumption manually. A system that automatically records the amount of alcohol consumption has a potential to improve behavior in drinking activities. Existing devices and systems support drinking activity detection and liquid intake estimation, but our target scenario requires the capability of determining the alcohol concentration of a beverage. We present Al-light, a smart ice cube to detect the alcohol concentration level of a beverage using an optical method. Al-light is the size of 31.9 x 38.6 x 52.6 mm and users can simply put it into a beverage for estimation. It embeds near infrared (1450 nm) and visible LEDs, and measures the magnitude of light absorption. Our device design integrates prior technology in a patent which exploits different light absorption properties between water and ethanol to determine alcohol concentration. Through our revisitation studies, we found that light at the wavelength of 1450 nm has strong distinguishability even with different types of commercially-available beverages. Our quantitative examinations on alcohol concentration estimation revealed that Al-light was able to achieve the estimation accuracy of approximately 2 % v/v with 13 commercially-available beverages. Although our current approach needs a regressor to be trained for a particular ambient light condition or the sensor to be calibrated using measurements with water, it does not require beverage-dependent models unlike prior work. We then discuss four applications our current prototype supports and future research directions.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Roche Ann, Bywood Petra, Freeman Toby, Pidd Ken, Borlagdan Joseph, and Allan Trifonoff. 2009. The Social Context of Alcohol Use in Australia. National Centre for Education and Training on Addiction (NCETA), Adelaide, Australia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Sangwon Bae, Denzil Ferreira, Brian Suffoletto, Juan C. Puyana, Ryan Kurtz, Tammy Chung, and Anind K. Dey. 2017. Detecting Drinking Episodes in Young Adults Using Smartphone-based Sensors. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 2, Article 5 (June 2017), 36 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Roman Benes. 2012. Method and device for determining an alcohol content of liquids, US Patent 8,106,361. (Jan. 2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Quansheng Chen, Jiewen Zhao, C.H. Fang, and Dongmei Wang. 2007. Feasibility study on identification of green, black and Oolong teas using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy based on support vector machine (SVM). Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 66, 3 (2007), 568--574.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Dhairya Dand. 2013. Cheers: Alcohol-aware Strobing Ice Cubes. In Proceedings of the CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2795--2796. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Kiyah J. Duffey and Barry M. Popkin. 2007. Shifts in patterns and consumption of beverages between 1965 and 2002. Obesity 15, 11 (2007), 2739--2747.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Mingming Fan, Khai N Truong, and Abhishek Ranjan. 2016. Exploring the Use of Capacitive Sensing to Externally Measure Liquid in Fluid Containers. Technical Report. Knowledge Media Design Institute, University of Toronto.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Denzil Ferreira, Vassilis Kostakos, and Anind K. Dey. 2015. AWARE: Mobile Context Instrumentation Framework. Frontiers in ICT 2 (2015), 6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Máximo Gallignani, Salvador Garrigues, and Miguel de la Guardia. 1993. Direct determination of ethanol in all types of alcoholic beverages by near-infrared derivative spectrometry. Analyst 118 (1993), 1167--1173. Issue 9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Mario A. Gutierrez, Michelle L. Fast, Anne H. Ngu, and Byron J. Gao. 2016. Real-Time Prediction of Blood Alcohol Content Using Smartwatch Sensor Data. In Revised Selected Papers of the International Conference on Smart Health - Volume 9545 (ICSH 2015). Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 175--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Pei-Yi Hsu, Ya-Han Lee, Chuang-Wen You, Yaliang Chuang, Ming-Chyi Huang, and Hao-Chuan Wang. 2017. Learning How Clinicians Use Self-logged Behavior Data when Managing Patients with Alcohol Use Problems in a Clinical Setting. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (UbiComp '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 73--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Pei-Yi Hsu, Ya-Fang Lin, Jian-Lun Huang, Chih-Chun Chang, Shih-Yao Lin, Ya-Han Lee, Chuang-Wen You, Yaliang Chuang, Ming-Chyi Huang, Hsin-Tung Tseng, and Hao-Chuan Wang. 2017. A Mobile Support System to Assist DUI Offenders on Probation in Reducing DUI Relapse. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (UbiComp '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 77--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. AOAC International. {n. d.}. AOAC Official Method 957.03 Alcohol by Volume in Distilled Liquors. http://www.eoma.aoac.org/methods/info.asp?ID=233. ({n. d.}). (Accessed on 2018/02/08).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Pascal Lessel, Maximilian Altmeyer, Frederic Kerber, Michael Barz, Cornelius Leidinger, and Antonio Krüger. 2016. WaterCoaster: A Device to Encourage People in a Playful Fashion to Reach Their Daily Water Intake Level. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1813--1820. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. Lester, D. Tan, S. Patel, and A. J. B. Brush. 2010. Automatic classification of daily fluid intake. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Fei Liu, Xujun Ye, Yong He, and Li Wang. 2009. Application of visible/near infrared spectroscopy and chemometric calibrations for variety discrimination of instant milk teas. Journal of Food Engineering 93, 2 (2009), 127--133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. James R. McKay, Teresa R. Franklin, Nicholas Patapis, and Kevin G. Lynch. 2006. Conceptual, methodological, and analytical issues in the study of relapse. Clinical Psychology Review 26, 2 (2006), 109--127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Mark Muraven, R Lorraine Collins, Saul Shiffman, and Jean A Paty. 2005. Daily fluctuations in self-control demands and alcohol intake. Psychology of addictive behaviors: journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors 19, 2 (June 2005), 140--147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jeremy Northcote and Michael Livingston. 2011. Accuracy of Self-Reported Drinking: Observational Verification of 'Last Occasion' Drink Estimates of Young Adults. Alcohol and Alcoholism 46, 6 (2011), 709--713.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Celio Pasquini. 2003. Near Infrared Spectroscopy: fundamentals, practical aspects and analytical applications. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society 14 (04 2003), 198--219. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext8pid=S0103-505320030002000068nrm=isoGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. M.J.C. Pontes, S.R.B. Santos, M.C.U. Araújo, L.F. Almeida, R.A.C. Lima, E.N. Gaião, and U.T.C.P. Souto. 2006. Classification of distilled alcoholic beverages and verification of adulteration by near infrared spectrometry. Food Research International 39, 2 (2006), 182--189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Benjamin Poppinga, Jutta Fortmann, Heiko Müller, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2014. IllumiMug: Revealing Imperceptible Characteristics of Drinks. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (NordiCHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 923--926. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Tauhidur Rahman, Alexander T. Adams, Perry Schein, Aadhar Jain, David Erickson, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2016. Nutrilyzer: A Mobile System for Characterizing Liquid Food with Photoacoustic Effect. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems CD-ROM (SenSys '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 123--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Jeffrey S. Simons, Thomas A. Wills, Noah N. Emery, and Russell M. Marks. 2015. Quantifying alcohol consumption: Self-report, transdermal assessment, and prediction of dependence symptoms. Addictive Behaviors 50 (2015), 205--212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. The International Alliance for Responsible Drinking (IARD). {n. d.}. Drinking Guidelines: General Population. available from <http://www.iard.org/policy-tables/drinking-guidelines-general-population/>. ({n. d.}).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Chuang-wen You, Kuo-Cheng Wang, Ming-Chyi Huang, Yen-Chang Chen, Cheng-Lin Lin, Po-Shiun Ho, Hao-Chuan Wang, Polly Huang, and Hao-Hua Chu. 2015. SoberDiary: A Phone-based Support System for Assisting Recovery from Alcohol Dependence. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3839--3848. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Al-light: An Alcohol-Sensing Smart Ice Cube

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
        Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 2, Issue 3
        September 2018
        1536 pages
        EISSN:2474-9567
        DOI:10.1145/3279953
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 September 2018
        • Accepted: 1 September 2018
        • Revised: 1 July 2018
        • Received: 1 May 2018
        Published in imwut Volume 2, Issue 3

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader