skip to main content
research-article

SoberMotion: Leveraging the Force of Probation Officers to Reduce the Risk of DUI Recidivism

Published: 18 September 2018 Publication History

Abstract

In this study, we sought to assist probation officers in their efforts to reduce the risk that offenders on probation would re-commit the offense of driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol. We prototyped a support system called SoberMotion, in which a breathalyzer is connected to the offender's smart phone via Bluetooth. Development of the system was based on pilot interviews with probation officers, psychiatrists, and offenders aimed at identifying the challenges and opportunities associated with this type of technology-based support mechanism. A corresponding phone app logs alcohol use behavior and identifies situations in which offenders should evaluate their sobriety before operating a vehicle. We conducted a two-month field study involving eight DUI offenders on probation, with the aim of evaluating the feasibility of the SoberMotion system. Our results indicate that most of the participants who drank alcohol while following the program performed multiple alcohol screening tests before operating a vehicle in order to avoid re-committing DUI. Responses collected via qualitative interviews indicate that SoberMotion is an effective approach to extending the power of probation officers seeking to reduce the risk of DUI recidivism.

References

[1]
ActivityRecognitionApi | Google APIs for Android. https://developers.google.com/android/reference/com/google/android/gms/location/ActivityRecognitionApi.
[2]
Analysis of DUI cases in Taiwan (in Traditional Chinese.
[3]
BACtrack Mobile Pro. https://www.bactrack.com/products/bactrack-mobile-smartphone-breathalyzer.
[4]
BACtrack Skyn™| World's 1st Wearable Alcohol Tracker. https://www.bactrack.com/pages/bactrack-skyn-wearable-alcohol-monitor.
[5]
BACtrack View™| Remote Alcohol Monitoring for iOS Devices. https://www.bactrack.com/pages/bactrack-view-remote-alcohol-monitoring.
[6]
Bridge accepts treatment; DUI prosecution deferred. http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=200303278slug=bridgedui27m.
[7]
CAGE Questionnaire. https://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/inscage.htm.
[8]
Car crashes kill 8 in Taiwan each day: minister. https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3266085.
[9]
Cards - Components - Material design guidelines. https://material.io/guidelines/components/cards.html.
[10]
Chapter 10.05 RCW: DEFERRED PROSECUTION?COURTS OF LIMITED JURISDICTION. http://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=10.05.
[11]
Dart 11mm breath alcohol sensor. https://www.dart-sensors.com/product/11mm-breath-alcohol-sensor/.
[12]
Digimore BT01-2 Bluetooth 4.0 Low Energy Module. http://www.digimore.com.tw/BT01-2.html.
[13]
DLib C++ Library. http://blog.dlib.net/2014/02/dlib-186-released-make-your-own-object.html.
[14]
DRINK DRIVING UK LAW HISTORY. https://www.drinkdriving.org/drink_driving_information_uklawhistory.php.
[15]
Drink size calculator. https://www.rethinkingdrinking.niaaa.nih.gov/tools/Calculators/drink-size-calculator.aspx.
[16]
Drinking and driving: a road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners (2007). http://www.who.int/roadsafety/projects/manuals/alcohol/drinking_driving.pdf.
[17]
Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety (DADSS). https://www.dadss.org.
[18]
Drunk driving. https://www.nhtsa.gov/risky-driving/drunk-driving.
[19]
Dutch alcohol policy. http://www.stap.nl/en/home/dutch-alcohol-policy.html.
[20]
Electronic Monitoring Devices | Community Corrections. https://www.oakgov.com/commcorr/Pages/program_service/electronic_monitor.aspx.
[21]
Face Detection using Haar Cascades. http://docs.opencv.org/trunk/d7/d8b/tutorial_py_face_detection.html.
[22]
Guth Model 2100, Alcohol Breath Test Simulator. https://www.guthlabs.com/product/2100-alcohol-simulator.
[23]
Impaired Driving: Get the Facts. https://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/impaired_driving/impaired-drv_factsheet.html.
[24]
Ko takes a step further to combat drunk driving. https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/2781711.
[25]
Learn about the Electronic Monitoring Program: Find out how the Global Positioning System (GPS) devices and remote breath alcohol monitoring devices used for probation work. https://www.mass.gov/info-details/learn-about-the-electronic-monitoring-program.
[26]
LTC4054-4.2 - Standalone Linear Li-Ion Battery Charger. http://www.linear.com/product/LTC4054-4.2.
[27]
Mandatory Alcohol Interlock Program. http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/roads/safety-rules/offences-penalties/drug-alcohol/interlock-pr ogram.html.
[28]
Micropower Electrochemical Gas Sensor Amplifier Reference Design. www.ti.com/lit/ug/tiduc74a/tiduc74a.pdf.
[29]
Mobile biometric breathalyzer speeds sobriety testing. https://gcn.com/Articles/2017/01/11/mobile-biometrics-parolee-sobriety.aspx.
[30]
Offenders threatened, jailed for 'false' alerts from alcohol-monitoring bracelets: "I didn't do anything wrong!". http://fox6now.com/2016/03/13/alcohol-monitoring-bracelets-questioned/.
[31]
Parole 8 Probation in Drunk Driving Cases. https://www.harvatinlaw.com/parole-probation-in-drunk-driving-cases.html.
[32]
Program Profile: Ottawa County (Mich.) Sobriety Court Program. https://www.crimesolutions.gov/ProgramDetails.aspx?ID=119.
[33]
Repeat DWI Offenders in the United States. https://one.nhtsa.gov/people/outreach/traftech/1995/TT085.htm.
[34]
SCRAM CAM Being Used to Combat Alcohol-Related Offenses in Tulsa Veterans Treatment Court. https://www.dmsprogram.com/scram-cam-used-combat-alcohol-related-offenses-tulsa-veterans-treatment-court/.
[35]
SCRAM CAM®. https://www.scramsystems.com/products/scram-continuous-alcohol-monitoring/.
[36]
SCRAM Remote Breath®. https://www.scramsystems.com/products/scram-remote-breath/,.
[37]
SPEC N-105 Selectivity and Cross-Sensitivity. https://www.spec-sensors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/SPEC-AN-105-Selectivity-and-Cross-Sensitivity.pdf.
[38]
SPEC's Breath Alcohol Sensor. http://www.spec-sensors.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/3SP_Ethanol_1000-C-Package-110-205.pdf.
[39]
Statistics of Probation Cases in Taipei District Prosecutors Office (in Traditional Chinese. www.slc.moj.gov.tw/HitCounter.asp?xItem=339963.
[40]
STMicroelectronics LPS35HW - MEMS pressure sensor. http://www.st.com/en/mems-and-sensors/lps35hw.html.
[41]
Taipei weighs alcohol abuse treatment for repeat drunk driving offenders (2015/08/03). http://englishnews.ftv.com.tw/Read.aspx?sno=37B54BA2BFA78C3B276224A4D5C41951.
[42]
Taitung Prison full to brim with drunk drivers, officials say. http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2009/07/16/2003448788.
[43]
Texas Instruments MSP430F5438 16-Bit Ultra-Low-Power Microcontroller. http://www.ti.com/product/MSP430F5438.
[44]
Texas Instruments MSP430I2020 16-bit Mixed Signal Microcontroller. http://www.ti.com/product/MSP430I2020.
[45]
The New Drunk-Driving-related Penalties Governing the Punishment of the Violation of Road Traffic Regulations Came into Effect on March 1. http://www.hpb.gov.tw/files/14-1000-1126,r16-1.php.
[46]
The New Drunk-Driving-related Penalties Governing the Punishment of the Violation of Road Traffic Regulations Came into Effect on March 1. http://www.hpb.gov.tw/files/14-1000-1126,r16-1.php.
[47]
White Color OLED Display, LY112WG22-128128. http://www.liyuan-elec.com/productgrouplist-210820293/OLED_Display.html.
[48]
Cavaiola Alan. The Challenges of Screening DUI Offenders. Criminology 8 Public Policy 12, 2, 173--177.
[49]
Sheila Alessi and Nancy Petry. 2013. A randomized study of cellphone technology to reinforce alcohol abstinence in the natural environment. Addiction (Abingdon, England) 108, 5 (2013), 900--909.
[50]
Brandon Amos, Bartosz Ludwiczuk, and Mahadev Satyanarayanan. 2016. OpenFace: A general-purpose face recognition library with mobile applications. Technical Report. CMU-CS-16-118, CMU School of Computer Science.
[51]
American Correctional Association and United States. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 1986. The Drunk Driver and Jail: Step by step to a comprehensive DWI corrections program. U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=ufs5AQAAMAAJ
[52]
Barbara A. Babb and David B. Wexler. 2014. Therapeutic Jurisprudence. Springer New York, New York, NY, 5202--5211.
[53]
Thomas F. Babor, John C. Higgins-Biddle, John B. Saunders, Maristela G. Monteiro, and World Health Organization. 2001. AUDIT: the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: guidelines for use in primary health care. Geneva: World Health Organization.
[54]
Sangwon Bae, Denzil Ferreira, Brian Suffoletto, Juan C. Puyana, Ryan Kurtz, Tammy Chung, and Anind K. Dey. 2017. Detecting Drinking Episodes in Young Adults Using Smartphone-based Sensors. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 2, Article 5 (June 2017), 36 pages.
[55]
Nancy P Barnett, EB Meade, and Tiffany R Glynn. 2014. Predictors of detection of alcohol use episodes using a transdermal alcohol sensor. Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology 22, 1 (2014), 86--98.
[56]
Scott Baum. 2000. Drink driving as a social problem: comparing the attitudes and knowledge of drink driving offenders and the general community. Accident Analysis 8 Prevention 32, 5 (2000), 689--694.
[57]
Abi Berger. 2002. Alcohol breath testing. BMJ 325, 7377 (2002), 1403.
[58]
Robert F. Borkenstein. 2012. 89, inventor of the breathalyzer. https://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/17/us/robert-f-borkenstein-89-inventor-of-the-breathalyzer.html. (August 2012).
[59]
Yun-Shan Chan, Chin-Shyan Chen, Lanying Huang, and Yu-I Peng. 2017. Sanction changes and drunk-driving injuries/deaths in Taiwan. Accident Analysis 8 Prevention 107 (2017), 102--109.
[60]
Ming-Yuan Chih, Timothy Patton, Fiona McTavish, Andrew J Isham, Chris L Judkins-Fisher, Amy K. Atwood, and David H. Gustafson. 2014. Predictive modeling of addiction lapses in a mobile health application. Journal of substance abuse treatment 46 1 (2014), 29--35.
[61]
David Crane, Claire Garnett, Susan Michie, Robert West, and Jamie Brown. 2018. A smartphone app to reduce excessive alcohol consumption: Identifying the effectiveness of intervention components in a factorial randomised control trial. Scientific Reports 8, 1 (2018), 4384.
[62]
Matthew DeMichele. 2014. Studying the community corrections field: Applying neo-institutional theories to a hidden element of mass social control. Theoretical Criminology 18, 4 (2014), 546--564.
[63]
Matthew DeMichele and Nathan C. Lowe. 2011. DWI Recidivism: Risk Implications for Community Supervision. Federal Probation Journal 75, 3 (2011), 19--24.
[64]
Matthew T. DeMichele. 2007. Probation and Parole's Growing Caseloads and Workload Allocation: Strategies for Managerial Decision Making. (May 2007).
[65]
Gustafson DH, McTavish FM, Chih M, and et al. 2014. A smartphone application to support recovery from alcoholism: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 71, 5 (2014), 566--572.
[66]
Patricia L. Dill and Elisabeth Wells-Parker. 2006. Court-mandated treatment for convicted drinking drivers. Alcohol Res Health. 29, 1 (2006), 41--48.
[67]
Karen L. Dunlap, Tracy G. Mullins, and Marilyn Stein. 2008. Guidelines for community supervision of DWI offenders. Technical Report DOT-HS-810-940. American Probation and Parole Association, Council of State Governments. 96 pages.
[68]
Tao Feng and Harry J.P. Timmermans. 2013. Transportation mode recognition using GPS and accelerometer data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 37, Supplement C (2013), 118--130.
[69]
S. Garrido-Jurado, R. Mu noz Salinas, F.J. Madrid-Cuevas, and M.J. Marín-Jiménez. 2014. Automatic generation and detection of highly reliable fiducial markers under occlusion. Pattern Recognition 47, 6 (2014), 2280--2292.
[70]
Beatriz Gonzalez-Iglesias, Jose Antonio Gomez-Fraguela, and Jorge Sobral. 2015. Potential Determinants of Drink Driving in Young Adults. Traffic Injury Prevention 16, 4 (2015), 345--352.
[71]
David H. Gustafson, Bret R. Shaw, Andrew Isham, Timothy Baker, Michael G. Boyle, and Michael Levy. 2011. Explicating an Evidence-Based, Theoretically Informed, Mobile Technology-Based System to Improve Outcomes for People in Recovery for Alcohol Dependence. Substance Use 8 Misuse 46, 1 (2011), 96--111.
[72]
Marie Helweg-Larsen and James A. Shepperd. 2001. Do Moderators of the Optimistic Bias Affect Personal or Target Risk Estimates? A Review of the Literature. Personality and Social Psychology Review 5, 1 (2001), 74--95.
[73]
Samuli Hemminki, Petteri Nurmi, and Sasu Tarkoma. 2013. Accelerometer-based Transportation Mode Detection on Smartphones. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 13, 14 pages.
[74]
Nathan James. 2015. Risk and Needs Assessment in the Criminal Justice System. https://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/17/us/robert-f-borkenstein-89-inventor-of-the-breathalyzer.html. (October 2015).
[75]
Danielle Kaeble and Lauren E. Glaze. 2016. Correctional Populations in the United States, 2016. http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail8iid=5870. (December 2016).
[76]
Hsin-Liu (Cindy) Kao, Bo-Jhang Ho, Allan C. Lin, and Hao-Hua Chu. 2012. Phone-based Gait Analysis to Detect Alcohol Usage. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 661--662.
[77]
Sandra C Lapham. 2010. The Limits of Tolerance: Convicted Alcohol-Impaired Drivers Share Experiences Driving Under the Influence. The Permanente Journal 14, 2 (2010), 26--30.
[78]
Charles Lindner. 1991. The Refocused Probation Home Visit: A Subtle But Revolutionary Change. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 7, 2 (1991), 115--127.
[79]
R.Z. Litten and J.P. Allen. 2012. Measuring Alcohol Consumption: Psychosocial and Biochemical Methods. Humana Press. https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=5ezSBwAAQBAJ
[80]
Jonas Ljungblad, Amin Allalou Bertil Hok, and Håkan Pettersson. 2017. Passive in-vehicle driver breath alcohol detection using advanced sensor signal acquisition and fusion. Traffic Injury Prevention 18:sup1 (2017), 31--36.
[81]
Christopher T. Lowenkamp, Alexander M. Holsinger, Anthony W. Flores, Igor Koutsenok, and Natalie Pearl. 2013. Changing Probation Officer Attitudes: Training Experience, Motivation, and Knowledge. Federal Probation, 77, 2 (2013), 54--58.
[82]
Diana MacLean, Sonal Gupta, Anna Lembke, Christopher Manning, and Jeffrey Heer. 2015. Forum77: An Analysis of an Online Health Forum Dedicated to Addiction Recovery. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1511--1526.
[83]
Stephen A. Maisto, Joseph C. Conigliaro, Adam J. Gordon, Kathleen A. McGinnis, and Amy C. Justice. 2008. An Experimental Study of the Agreement of Self-Administration and Telephone Administration of the Timeline Followback Interview. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 69, 3 (2008), 468--471.
[84]
R E Mann, L Anglin, K Wilkins, E R Vingilis, S MacDonald, and W J Sheu. 1994. Rehabilitation for convicted drinking drivers (second offenders): effects on mortality. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 55, 3 (1994), 372--374.
[85]
Alex Mariakakis, Sayna Parsi, Shwetak N. Patel, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2018. Drunk User Interfaces: Determining Blood Alcohol Level Through Everyday Smartphone Tasks. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 234, 13 pages.
[86]
Thomas H. Nochajski and Paul R. Stasiewicz. 2006. Relapse to driving under the influence (DUI): A review. Clinical Psychology Review 26, 2 (2006), 179--195.
[87]
G. A. Panza, J. Weinstock, G. I. Ash, and L. S. Pescatello. 2012. Psychometric Evaluation of the Timeline Followback for Exercise among College Students. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 13, 6 (2012), 779--788.
[88]
J. Pedersen, E. R. andGrow, S. Duncan, C. Neighbors, and M. E. Larimer. 2012. Concurrent validity of an online version of the Timeline Followback assessment. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 26, 3 (2012), 672--677.
[89]
Antoinette Poulton, Jason J. Pan, Loren Bruns, Richard O. Sinnott, and Robert Hester. 2017. Assessment of alcohol intake: Retrospective measures versus a smartphone application. Addictive behaviors, 83 (2017), 35--41.
[90]
American Probation and Parole Association. 2012. Hardcore Drunk Driving Community Supervision Guide: A Resource Outlining Probation 8 Parole Challenges, Effective Strategies and Model Programs. http://www.centurycouncil.org/sites/default/files/materials/HCDD-Community-Supervision-Guide.pdf. (July 2012).
[91]
William J. Rauch, Paul L. Zador, Eileen M. Ahlin, Jan M. Howard, Kevin C. Frissell, and G. Doug Duncan. 2010. Risk of Alcohol-Impaired Driving Recidivism Among First Offenders and Multiple Offenders. American Journal of Public Health 100, 5 (2010), 919--924.
[92]
Jennifer Schwartz. 2008. Gender differences in drunk driving prevalence rates and trends: A 20-year assessment using multiple sources of evidence. Addictive Behaviors 33, 9 (2008), 1217--1222.
[93]
H M. Simpson, D. J. Beirness, R. D. Robertson, D. R. Mayhew, and J. H. Hedlund. 2004. Hard Core Drinking Drivers. Traffic Injury Prevention 5, 3 (2004), 261--269.
[94]
Stacey L Sklaver. 2010. The Pros and Cons of Using Electronic Monitoring Programs in Juvenile Cases. Juvenile Justice Committee Newsletter 5 (2010).
[95]
Smyth and Heron. 2016. Is providing mobile interventions "just-in-time" helpful? an experimental proof of concept study of just-in-time intervention for stress management. In 2016 IEEE Wireless Health (WH). 1--7.
[96]
Linda C. Sobell, Sangeeta Agrawal, Helen Annis, Hector Ayala-Velazquez, Leticia Echeverria, Gloria I. Leo, Janusz K. Rybakowski, Christer Sandahl, Bill Saunders, Sally Thomas, and Marcin Ziolkowski. 2001. Cross-Cultral Evaluation of Two drinking Assessment Instruments: Alcohol timeline Followback and Inventory of Drinking Situations. Substance Use 8 Misuse 36, 3 (2001), 313--331.
[97]
Linda Carter Sobell, Sangeeta Agrawal, Mark B Sobell, Gloria I Leo, Lisa Johnson Young, John A Cunningham, and Edward R Simco. 2003. Comparison of a quick drinking screen with the timeline followback for individuals with alcohol problems. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 64, 6 (2003), 858--861.
[98]
Pauline Spencer. 2005. State Punishment and Private Prisons. 55, 3 (2005), 437--546.
[99]
SWOV. 2016. Alcohol interlock devices. SWOV Fact sheet, March 2016. https://www.swov.nl/en/facts-figures/factsheet/alcohol-interlock-devices. (March 2016).
[100]
Acar Tamersoy, Munmun De Choudhury, and Duen Horng Chau. 2015. Characterizing Smoking and Drinking Abstinence from Social Media. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Hypertext 8 Social Media (HT '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 139--148.
[101]
Braun Virginia and Clarke Victoria. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.
[102]
William L. White and David L. Gasperin. (2007) The "hard core drinking driver": identification, treatment, and community management. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 25, 3 (2007), 113--132.
[103]
Jie Yang, Simon Sidhom, Gayathri Chandrasekaran, Tam Vu, Hongbo Liu, Nicolae Cecan, Yingying Chen, Marco Gruteser, and Richard P. Martin. 2011. Detecting Driver Phone Use Leveraging Car Speakers. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 97--108.
[104]
Chuang-wen You, Kuo-Cheng Wang, Ming-Chyi Huang, Yen-Chang Chen, Cheng-Lin Lin, Po-Shiun Ho, Hao-Chuan Wang, Polly Huang, and Hao-Hua Chu. 2015. SoberDiary: A Phone-based Support System for Assisting Recovery from Alcohol Dependence. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3839--3848.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)HearDrinking: Drunkenness detection and BACs predictions based on acoustic signalPervasive and Mobile Computing10.1016/j.pmcj.2025.102020108(102020)Online publication date: Mar-2025
  • (2023)Leveraging driver vehicle and environment interaction: Machine learning using driver monitoring cameras to detect drunk drivingProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580975(1-32)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2022)Forks Over Knives: Predictive Inconsistency in Criminal Justice Algorithmic Risk Assessment ToolsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society10.1111/rssa.12966185:Supplement_2(S692-S723)Online publication date: 30-Nov-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 2, Issue 3
September 2018
1536 pages
EISSN:2474-9567
DOI:10.1145/3279953
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 September 2018
Accepted: 01 September 2018
Revised: 01 May 2018
Received: 01 February 2018
Published in IMWUT Volume 2, Issue 3

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Alcohol Use Disorder
  2. Driving Under the Influence (DUI)
  3. Mobile Support System
  4. Therapeutic Jurisprudence (TJ)

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)62
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10
Reflects downloads up to 14 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)HearDrinking: Drunkenness detection and BACs predictions based on acoustic signalPervasive and Mobile Computing10.1016/j.pmcj.2025.102020108(102020)Online publication date: Mar-2025
  • (2023)Leveraging driver vehicle and environment interaction: Machine learning using driver monitoring cameras to detect drunk drivingProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580975(1-32)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2022)Forks Over Knives: Predictive Inconsistency in Criminal Justice Algorithmic Risk Assessment ToolsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society10.1111/rssa.12966185:Supplement_2(S692-S723)Online publication date: 30-Nov-2022
  • (2021)Gamified Mobile Applications for Improving Driving BehaviorMobile Information Systems10.1155/2021/66770752021Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
  • (2021)Go Gig or Go Home: Enabling Social Sensing to Share Personal Data with Intimate Partner for the Health and Wellbeing of Long-Hour workersProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445278(1-16)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
  • (2020)Evaluation of the MoMba Live Long® Remote Smoking Detection System During and After Pregnancy: A Feasibility Study (Preprint)JMIR mHealth and uHealth10.2196/18809Online publication date: 23-Mar-2020
  • (2020)A Personalised Intervention Model for Improving the Effectiveness of Driving-Behaviour AppsProceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3340631.3398680(372-375)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2020
  • (2019)SoberCommProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/33512773:3(1-31)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2019
  • (2019)Using sensing technologies, self-reported information, and interpersonal observations to promote health and well-being in the workplaceAdjunct Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers10.1145/3341162.3343800(242-245)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2019
  • (2019)Enabling Personal Alcohol Tracking using Transdermal Sensing WristbandsProceedings of the 21st International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services10.1145/3338286.3344384(1-6)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2019

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media