skip to main content
10.1145/3265689.3265708acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Modeling and Analysis of Demand for Personalized Portal

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 July 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

E-commerce1 has experienced great growth during the past two decades, which changes the consumption mode of consumers significantly. All researchers from institutions and enterprises want to identify and satisfy the personalized demand intelligently and conveniently by every possible means. In this paper, we proposed smart demand strategy based on holographic demand and model of transaction subject, which is applicable for the decentralized, disintermediated, intelligent e-commerce platform. User demands are classified from two aspects, which will improve the accuracy of demand obtaining. In addition, from standardized description of demand and full life cycle tracking of demand, the user demand will be identified comprehensively. Meanwhile, models of the user, including physical, preference, knowledge, digital label, and social attributes, are built based on his standard description and fragmented description from his interactive objects, which results in a holographic demander. Then, smart demand strategy, i.e. demand forecast and recommendation are proposed. Based on trigger point and demand attributes, the user demand will be updated in real time, which ensures the accuracy of demand accusation and recommendation. The relationship and help degree, based on the interactions within the cyberspace, are important references in filtering the recommendation.

References

  1. Huang Y, Chai Y, Liu Y, and Gu X, Holographic Personalized Portal for Industrial Ecological System, The International Conference on crowd science and engineering, pp. 9--13, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Shen J, Huang Y, Chai Y, A cyber-anima-based model of material conscious information network, International Journal of Crowd Science, vol.1, no.1, pp. 9--25, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Koren Y, Collaborative filtering with temporal dynamics, ACM, Vol. 53, pp, 447--456, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Yan D, Research on knowledge service oriented intelligent recommendation system, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Crabtree B, Soltysiak S, Identifying and tracking changing interests, International Journal on Digital Libraries, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 38--53, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Maloof M, Michalski R, Selecting Examples for Partial Memory Learning, Machine Learning, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 27--52, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Slywotzky A, The Age of the Choiceboard, Harvard Business Review, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 40--41, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Yue M, HouéR, and Grabot B, The Age of the Choiceboard, MRP-based negotiation in customer-supplier relationship, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 628--633, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Popescu A, Maria, Etzioni, and Oren, Extracting Product Features and Opinions from Reviews, in Natural Language Processing and Text Mining, London: Springer, pp. 9--28, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Chen Y.H, Wang YZ, and Wong MH, A web-based fuzzy mass customization system, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 280--287, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Hansen T, Scheer C, and P. Loos, Product Configurators in Electronic Commerce--Extension of the Configurator Concept towards Customer Recommendation, in Proc. 2nd Interdisciplinary World Congress on Mass Customization and Personalization, Germany, pp. 1--18, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Stormer H, Improving product configurators by means of a collaborative recommender system, International Journal of Mass Customisation, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 165--178, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Piller F, Schubert P, Koch M, and Moslein K, Overcoming Mass Confusion: Collaborative Customer Co-Design in Online Communities, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1--28, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Aggarwal C, Yu P, Data Mining Techniques for Personalization, Data Engineering Bulletin, vol. 23, no. 23, pp. 4--9, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Moe W, Buying, Searching, or Browsing: Differentiating between Online Shoppers Using In-Store Navigational Clickstream, Journal of Consumer Psychology, vol. 13, no. 13, pp. 29--39, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Middleton S, Shadbolt N, Roure D, Ontological user profiling in recommender systems, Acm Transactions on Information Systems, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 54--88, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Elkahky A, Song Y, He X, A Multi-View Deep Learning Approach for Cross Domain User Modeling in Recommendation Systems, International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 278--288, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Sahoo N, Krishnan R, Duncan G, Research Note---The Halo Effect in Multicomponent Ratings and Its Implications for Recommender Systems: The Case of Yahoo! Movies, Information Systems Research, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 231--246, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Chuan N, Sivaji A, Shahimin M, Kansei Engineering for e-commerce Sunglasses Selection in Malaysia, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 707--714, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Bruyn A, Liechty J, Huizingh E, Offering Online Recommendations with Minimum Customer Input through Conjoint-Based Decision Aids, Marketing Science, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 443--460, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Vargo S, Lusch R, Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing, Journal of Marketing, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 1--17, 2004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Xu Z, Multiple attribute decision making based on different types of linguistic information, Journal of Southeast University, vol. 22, pp. 134--136, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Song Y, Lu Z, Leung C, Collaborative boosting for activity classification in microblogs, Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pp. 482--490, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Chen W, Hsu W, Lee M, Making recommendations from multiple domains, Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pp. 892--900, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Erdal, D. Edward, The psychology of sharing: an evolutionary approach, University of St Andrews, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Modeling and Analysis of Demand for Personalized Portal

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ICCSE'18: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Crowd Science and Engineering
          July 2018
          220 pages
          ISBN:9781450365871
          DOI:10.1145/3265689

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 28 July 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          ICCSE'18 Paper Acceptance Rate33of89submissions,37%Overall Acceptance Rate92of247submissions,37%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader