skip to main content
10.1145/3266237.3266249acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

FLOSS in software engineering education: an update of a systematic mapping study

Published:17 September 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Context: Free/Libre/Open Source Software (FLOSS) projects have been used in Software Engineering Education (SEE) to address the need for more realistic settings that reduce the gap between software engineering (SE) courses and industry needs. A systematic mapping study (SMS) performed in 2013 structured the research area on the use of FLOSS projects in SEE. Objective: Update the 2013 SMS with studies published in the last five years, classifying and summarizing them to discuss trends and identify research gaps in the context of the use of FLOSS projects in SEE. Method: We retrieved and analyzed a set of 4132 papers published from 2013 to 2017, from which 33 papers were selected and classified. We analyzed the new results and compared them with those from the previous SMS to confirm or discover trends. Results: The updated mapping summarizes the studies published in the last five years, most of them in conferences. Our analysis confirmed trends previously observed for three facets (SE area, curriculum choice and assessment type) and discovered new trends for other facets. Conclusion: Studies report the use of FLOSS projects in regular, comprehensive SE courses. The prevalence of experience reports over solution proposals in the last five years may indicate that researchers are more concerned with the use and evaluation of existing proposals, although there are still opportunities for more empirical work based on sound educational research methods.

References

  1. 2013. Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK). (2013). www.swebok.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J Bishop, C Jensen, W Scacchi, and A Smith. 2016. How to Use Open Source Software in Education. In 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (SIGCSE '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 321--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J Bowring and Q Burke. 2016. Shaping Software Engineering Curricula Using Open Source Communities. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 27, 1 (2016), 5--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D Budgen, M Turner, P Brereton, and B Kitchenham. 2008. Using Mapping Studies in Software Engineering. In Proceedings of PPIG 2008, Vol. 2. Lancaster University, 195--204.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. K Buffardi. 2015. Localized open source collaboration in software engineering education. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), IEEE. IEEE, 1--5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. K Buffardi. 2016. Localized open source software projects: Exploring realism and motivation. In Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), 11th Intern. Conf. on. IEEE, 382--387.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. D Castelluccia and G Visaggio. 2013. Teaching evidence-based software engineering: learning by a collaborative mapping study of open source software. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 38, 6 (2013), 1--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Z Chen, A Memon, and B Luo. 2014. Combining research and education of software testing: a preliminary study. In Proc. of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. ACM, 1179--1180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. V Cicirello. 2017. Student developed computer science educational tools as software engineering course projects. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 32, 3 (2017), 55--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Y Ding, Y Hang, G Wan, and S He. 2014. Application of software visualization in programming teaching. In Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), 9th Intern. Conf. on. IEEE, 803--806.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. G Diniz, Marco AG Silva, M Gerosa, and I Steinmacher. 2017. Using gamification to orient and motivate students to contribute to OSS projects. In Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE), IEEE/ACM 10th Intern. Workshop on. IEEE, 36--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M Dorodchi and N Dehbozorgi. 2016. Utilizing open source software in teaching practice-based software engineering courses. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), IEEE. IEEE, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. H Ellis, M Chua, G Hislop, M Purcell, and S Dziallas. 2013. Towards a model of faculty development for FOSS in education. In Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T), IEEE 26th Conf. on. IEEE, 269--273.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. H Ellis, G Hislop, S Jackson, and L Postner. 2015. Team Project Experiences in Humanitarian Free and Open Source Software (HFOSS). ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 15, 4 (2015), 18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. H Ellis, G Hislop, SM Pulimood, B Morgan, and B Coleman. 2015. Software engineering learning in HFOSS: A multi-institutional study. In 22nd Annual ASEE Conference and Exhibition, Seattle.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. H Ellis, S Jackson, D Burdge, L Postner, G Hislop, and J Diggs. 2014. Learning within a professional environment: shared ownership of an HFOSS project. In 15th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education. ACM, 95--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. S Fernandes and LS Barbosa. 2016. Collaborative Environments in Software Engineering Teaching: A FLOSS Approach. In European Conf. on e-Learning. Academic Conf. International Limited, 201.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. S Fernandes, MH Martinho, A Cerone, and LS Barbosa. 2013. Integrating formal and informal learning through a FLOSS-based innovative approach. In Intern. Conf. on Collaboration and Technology. Springer, 208--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. S Gokhale, T Smith, and R McCartney. 2013. Teaching software engineering from a maintenance-centric view using open-source software. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 28, 6 (2013), 189--191. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S Gokhale, T Smith, and R McCartney. 2013. Teaching software maintenance with open source software: Experiences and lessons. In Frontiers in Education Conference, IEEE. IEEE, 1664--1670.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. G Hislop and H Ellis. 2017. Humanitarian Open Source Software in Computing Education. Computer 50, 10 (2017), 98--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. G Hislop, H Ellis, S Pulimood, B Morgan, S Mello-Stark, B Coleman, and C Macdonell. 2015. A multi-institutional study of learning via student involvement in humanitarian free and open source software projects. In 11th Annual Intern. Conf. on International Computing Education Research. ACM, 199--206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. C Horstmann. 2009. Challenges and Opportunities in an Open Source Software Development Course. In Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) Symposium. 1--3. http://www.hfoss.org/symposium09/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. V Krishnamoorthy, B Appasamy, and C Scaffidi. 2013. Using intelligent tutors to teach students how APIs are used for software engineering in practice. IEEE Transactions on Education 56, 3 (2013), 355--363. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. D Krutz, S Malachowsky, and T Reichlmayr. 2014. Using a real world project in a software testing course. In 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, 49--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. C Kussmaul. 2016. Experience Report: Guiding Faculty & Students to Participate in Humanitarian FOSS Communities. In Technology for Education (T4E), IEEE 8th Intern. Conf. on. IEEE, 224--227.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. CL Kussmaul, H Ellis, G Hislop, L Postner, and D Burdge. 2017. Board# 77: Helping Faculty & Students to Participate in Humanitarian Free & Open Source Software: The OpenFE & OpenPath Projects. In 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. B K MacKellar, M Sabin, and A B Tucker. 2015. Bridging the academia-industry gap in software engineering: a client-oriented open source software projects course. In Open Source Technology: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. IGI Global, 1927--1950.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. D Mishra, T Hacaloglu, and A Mishra. 2014. Teaching Software Verification and Validation Course: A Case Study. International Journal of Engineering Education 30 (2014), 1476--1485.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. B Morgan and C Jensen. 2014. Lessons learned from teaching open source software development. In IFIP Intern. Conference on Open Source Systems. Springer, 133--142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. D Nascimento, R Bittencourt, and Chavez C. 2015. Open source projects in software engineering education: a mapping study. Computer Science Education 25, 1 (2015), 67--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. PM Papadopoulos, I Stamelos, and A Meiszner. 2013. Enhancing software engineering education through open source projects: Four years of students' perspectives. Education and Information Technologies 18, 2 (2013), 381--397. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. K Petersen, R Feldt, S Mujtaba, and M Mattsson. 2008. Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering. In Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE'08), 12th International Conf. on. 68--77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. G Pinto, F Figueira Filho, I Steinmacher, and M Gerosa. 2017. Training software engineers using open-source software: the professors' perspective. In Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T), 30th IEEE Conference on. 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. S Rekha and V Adinarayanan. 2014. An Open Source approach to enhance industry preparedness of students. In Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), Intern. Conf. on. IEEE, 194--200.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. T Smith, S Gokhale, and R McCartney. 2014. Understanding students' preferences of software engineering projects. In Conference on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education. ACM, 135--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. T Smith, R McCartney, S Gokhale, and L Kaczmarczyk. 2014. Selecting open source software projects to teach software engineering. In 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, 397--402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. A Van Deursen, M Aniche, J Aué, R Slag, M De Jong, A Nederlof, and E Bouwers. 2017. A collaborative approach to teaching software architecture. In ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, 591--596. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. A Villarrubia and H Kim. 2015. Building a community system to teach collaborative software development. In Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), 10th International Conference on. IEEE, 829--833.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. FLOSS in software engineering education: an update of a systematic mapping study

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          SBES '18: Proceedings of the XXXII Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering
          September 2018
          379 pages
          ISBN:9781450365031
          DOI:10.1145/3266237

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 17 September 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          SBES '18 Paper Acceptance Rate38of140submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate147of427submissions,34%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader