skip to main content
10.1145/3266237.3266256acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Multidisciplinary groups learning to develop mobile applications from the challenge based learning methodology

Published:17 September 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

For years traditional learning approaches have been applied in schools and universities, where teachers are considered the knowledge center, leaving students as secondary actors of learning processes. In order to investigate new learning methodologies a set of new approaches have been tried. Challenge Based Learning (CBL) is one of these proposals, created with the essential principles of a 21st century learning environment in mind. Since 2014, the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) have applied such methodology in the context whose multidisciplinary students from different courses learn to develop mobile apps, and work together looking for solutions that can impact lives. This paper presents how CBL was applied for two student groups, mentioning learned lessons and changes performed in the learning process from these lessons.

References

  1. E. G. West. 1975. Education and the Industrial Revolution. British Journal of Educational Studies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Mark Nichols, Karen Cator, Marco Torres. 2016. Challenge Based Learner User Guide. Redwood City, CA: Digital Promise. Retrieved from https://cbl.digitalpromise.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2016/10/CBL_Guide2016.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Apple Inc. 2018. iOS Overview. Retrieved from https://developer.apple.com/ios/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Apple Inc. 2018. Engage phase - CBL. Retrieved from http://cbl.digitalpromise.org/stories/engage/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Apple Inc. 2018. Investigate phase - CBL. Retrieved from http://cbl.digitalpromise.org/stories/investigate.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Apple Inc. 2018. Act phase - CBL. Retrieved from http://cbl.digitalpromise.org/stories/act/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Apple Inc. 2011. Challenge Based Learning - The Report from the Implementation Project. Retrieved from https://www.apple.com/ca/education/docs/NMC_CBLi_Report_Oct_2011.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jaxenter magazine. 2015. The countries introducing coding into the curriculum. Retrieved from https://jaxenter.com/the-countries-introducing-coding-into-the-curriculum-120815.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Apple Inc. 2018. Swift Language. Retrieved from https://www.apple.com/swift/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Erich Gamma, Richard Helm, Ralph Johnson, and John Vlissides. 1994. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object- Oriented Software, Addison-Wesley Professional Computing Series. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hans Eysenck. 1967. The biological basis of personality. Springfield: C. C. Thomas.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Open Source Psychometrics Project. 2018. Interactive Version of the Open Four Temperaments Scales. Retrieved from https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/O4TS/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. David Keirsey. 1998. Please Understand Me II: Temperament, Character, Intelligence. Prometheus Nemesis Book Company (May, 1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. Michalko. 2006. Thinkertoys: A Handbook of Creative-Thinking Techniques. Ten Speed Press, 2nd ed (Jun. 2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Apple Inc. 2018. WWDC - Apple Developer. Retrieved from https://developer.apple.com/wwdc/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Joshua Greene and Jay Strawn. 2018. Design Patterns by Tutorials. First Edition. Retrieved from https://store.raywenderlich.com/products/design-patterns-by-tutorials.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Dorothy Graham, Erik V. Veenendaal, Isabel Evans, Rex Black. 2008. Foundations of Software Testing: ISTQB Certification. Cengage Learning Emea (Jan. 2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. GitLab tool. 2018. Retrieved from https://about.gitlab.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Apple Inc. 2018. Xcode Server and Continuous Integration Guide. Retrieved from https://developer.apple.com/library/content/documentation/IDEs/Conceptual/xcode_guide-continuous_integration/index.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Andrew Diniz da Costa and Ricardo Venieris. 2018. DEV PUC-Rio Youtube Channel. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWb9EHguiXaEvLcGZiydIqA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Andrew Diniz da Costa. 2018. DEV PUC-Rio on App Store. Retrieved from https://itunes.apple.com/br/app/dev-puc-rio/id1224674895?mt=8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Woei Hung, David H. Jonassen, and Rude Liu. 2008. Problem-based learning. In the Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed.), Routledge, 485--506.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Joseph S. Krajcik and Phyllis C. Blumenfeld. 2006. Project-based learning. In R. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 317--334.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Multidisciplinary groups learning to develop mobile applications from the challenge based learning methodology

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            SBES '18: Proceedings of the XXXII Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering
            September 2018
            379 pages
            ISBN:9781450365031
            DOI:10.1145/3266237

            Copyright © 2018 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 17 September 2018

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            SBES '18 Paper Acceptance Rate38of140submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate147of427submissions,34%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader