skip to main content
10.1145/3267129.3267144acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Local Topology Aware Probabilistic Routing

Published:25 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Gossip-based packet forwarding is used in unstructured networks is to reduce traffic overhead in dense networks and to minimize early gossip termination in sparse networks. Unlike in flooding, where packets are forwarded to all the neighbors, in Gossip-based protocols packets are forwarded with some probability value p<1, to reduce redundancy. However this value has to be carefully tuned: if too small, early gossip termination is likely to occur, if too large, flooding storms can take place, as with the flooding protocol. In this work, we propose to use a forwarding probability based on local topology indicators, such as the effective node degree of the forwarding node: the choice of such probability takes into account the local topology. In a context where each node can have a different forwarding probability, another way of setting efficiently its value consists in further tuning such value for each message, based on the estimated level of completion of the corresponding communication task: to this purpose we propose to use a simple formula based on the messages hop-count. We validate these approaches by simulation using ns-2 in sparse and dense networks and show that they improve the performances in terms of traffic overhead and average end-to-end delay. In terms of packet delivery ratio, the proposed approach yields results comparable to those of the standard protocol AODV.

References

  1. D. Huynh A. Amis, R. Prakash and T. Vuong. Max-min d-cluster formation in wireless ad-hoc networks. INFOCOM., 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. C. Hauser W. Irish J. Larson-S. Shenker-H. Sturgis D. Swinehart A. Demers, D. Greene and D. Terry. Epidemic algorithms for replicated database maintenance. In Proceeding of ACM Symposium, Principles of Distributed Computing, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Ade and P. Tijar. Performance comparisons of aodv, dsdv, dsr routing protocols in mobile ad-hoc networks. International Journal of Information Technology and Knowledge Management, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. R. Annu and M. Reema. Performance evaluation and study of routing protocols: Manet vs vanet. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science (IJAERS), Apr- 2017, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Anubhava and A. Parvez. A probabilistic gossip-based secure protocol for unstructured p2p networks. International Conference on Information Security and Privacy (ICISP2015),11--12 December 2015, Nagpur, INDIA, Vol. 78:595 -- 602.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. W. Liu C. Chiang, H. K. Wu and M. Gerla. Routing in clustered multi-hop, mobile wireless networks with dading channel. SICON, Singapore, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. C. Belding C. Perkins and E. Das. Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector (aodv) routing. RFC-3561 Network Working Group, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. V.Sujitha C. Rangarajan, S.Sridevikarumari. Recent routing protocols in mobile adhoc network (manet). International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, ICITCSA 2017, Vol. 6, Special Issue 1, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Dobra D. Kempe and J. Gehrke. Gossip-based computation of aggregate information. In IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'03), 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. B. Johnson David and A. Maltz David. Dynamic source routing in ad-hoc wireless networks. Mobile Computing, Vol. 5:pp. 153--181, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Gabriele Gianini Dawit Kifle and Mulugeta Libsie. Improving gossiping performance by means of local topology information. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Management of Computational and Collective Intelligence in Digital EcoSystems - MEDES 2015, pages 142--147, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. Dhurandher and G. V. Singh. Weight-based adaptive clustering in wireless ad-hoc networks. IEEE, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. G. Dommety and R. Jain. Potential networking applications of global positioning systems (gps). Technical report TR-24, 1996, The Ohio State University, USA, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. X. Wang X. Xue F. Li, S. Zhang and H. Shen. Vote-based clustering algorithm in mobile ad-hoc networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Networking Technologies, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Gabriele Gianini and Ernesto Damiani. Do neighbor-avoiding walkers walk as if in a small-world network? In INFOCOM Workshops 2009, IEEE, pages 1--6. IEEE, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Gabriele Gianini and Ernesto Damiani. Neighbor-avoiding random walks for information dissemination. Communications of SIWN, 7:108--113, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gabriele Gianini and Ernesto Damiani. The cover time of neighbor-avoiding gossiping on geometric random networks. In Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST), 2013 7th IEEE International Conference on, pages 7--12. IEEE, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Gabriele Gianini, Ernesto Damiani, Guido Lena-Cota, and Paulius Danielius. Gossiping solutions for distributed consensus on unstructured overlays. In Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST), 2010 4th IEEE International Conference on, pages 246--251. IEEE, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. A. Haider and A. Raed. Routing discovery scheme for high mobility in manet. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN), Jan. 2017, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Z. H. J. Halpern and L. Li. Gossiping-based ad-hoc routing. In proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 200, The 21st Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Z. H. J. Halpern and L. Li. Gossiping-based ad-hoc routing. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), Vol. 14, Issue 3:pp.479--491, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. B. Johnson H. Yih-Chun J. Brothh, A. Maltz and J. Jo-eta. A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad-hoc network routing protocols. In proceeding MobiCom 98 Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking1998, New York, USA), pages pp. 85--97, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. P. Eugster J. Luo and J. Haubaux. Route driven gossip: Probabilistic reliable multicast in ad-hoc networks. INFOCOM, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. B. Jagdale and P. Pragati. Analysis and comparison of distance vector, dsdv and aodv protocols in manets. International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems (IJDPS), 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. H. Sadawarti K. Gupta and K. Verma. Review of various routing protocols for manets. International Journal of Information and Electronics Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. J. Kaur and G.Singh. Manet routing protocols: A review. JCSE-International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Volume-5, Issue-3, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Z. Lingling L. Yang L. Tianbo, C. Hao. Anonymous routing protocols for mobile ad-hoc networks. International Journal of Security and Its Applications, 2016, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. A. Rehan Ashraf M. Toqeer, N. Tabassam and M.A. Syed. Gossip based routing protocol design for ad hoc networks. IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science, January 2012, Vol. 9, Issue 1, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. P. T. Omar V. Sejwar P. Suman, D. Bisen and R. Shukla. Comparative study of routing protocols for mobile ad-hoc networks. International Journal of Information Technology and Knowledge Management, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. C. Perkins and C. Royer. Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector (aodv) routing. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing System and Applications, Vol. 8 No.8:pp. 533--546, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. C. E. Perkins and T. J. Watson. Highly dynamic destination sequenced distance vector routing (dsdv) for mobile computers. In ACM SIGCOMMÕ94 Conference on Communications, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. S. Rajeswari and Y. Venkataramani. An adaptive energy efficient and reliable gossip routing protocol for mobile ad-hoc networks. IJCTE, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. D. Ratul and N. Himadri. Secure routing protocols for mobile ad-hoc network (manets) --a review. International Journal of Emerging Trends and Technology in Computer Science (IJETTCS), Jan. - Feb. 2016, Volume 5, Issue 1, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. E.M Royal and T. Chia-Keong. A review of current routing protocols for ad-hoc mobile wireless networks. IEEE Personal Communication, 1999, Dallas Texas USA, pages pp. pp. 45--55, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. K. Aditi S. Rajeshwar, S. Tarun. A comparative review on routing protocols in manet.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. C. Yuh-Shyan-S. Jang-Ping T. Yu-Chee Tseng, N. Sze-Yao. The broadcast storm problem in a mobile ad-hoc networks. Wireless Networks, Vol. 8:pp. 153--167, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. R. Hamid R J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves X. Hui, W. Xianren. A unified analysis of routing protocols in manets. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS., VOL. 58, NO, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Y. Xuan and F. Sheng. An entropy-based weighted clustering algorithm and its optimization for ad-hoc networks. Third IEEE International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob 2007), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. K. Young-Bae and H. Vaidya Nitin. Location-aided routing (lar) in mobile ad-hoc networks. Wireless Networks, Vol. 6:pp. 307--321, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. Local Topology Aware Probabilistic Routing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      Q2SWinet'18: Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Symposium on QoS and Security for Wireless and Mobile Networks
      October 2018
      153 pages
      ISBN:9781450359634
      DOI:10.1145/3267129
      • General Chair:
      • Peter Müller,
      • Program Chair:
      • Ahmed Mostefaoui

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 October 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate46of131submissions,35%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader