skip to main content
10.1145/3267851.3267915acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesivaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Looking the Part: The Effect of Attire and Setting on Perceptions of a Virtual Health Counselor

Published:05 November 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The visual design of virtual agents and scenes presents developers with a plethora of choices. We conducted two studies in which we manipulated the design of a virtual health counselor agent's attire and its virtual environment. Our studies demonstrate that virtual agents dressed to fit their health care role are perceived to be more professional, trustworthy, reassuring, and more persuasive regarding medical decisions, compared to agents whose appearance is not role-appropriate. Furthermore, the effect of an agent's attire is greater than that of its virtual environment. The results of this research can help create visual guidelines for the development of virtual agents in tasks that rely on user trust.

References

  1. Jeremy N Bailenson, Jim Blascovich, and Rosanna E Guadagno. 2008. Self-representations in immersive virtual environments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 38, 11 (2008), 2673--2690.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Jeremy N Bailenson, Kim Swinth, Crystal Hoyt, Susan Persky, Alex Dimov, and Jim Blascovich. 2005. The independent and interactive effects of embodied-agent appearance and behavior on self-report, cognitive, and behavioral markers of copresence in immersive virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 14, 4 (2005), 379--393. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Amy L Baylor. 2009. Promoting motivation with virtual agents and avatars: role of visual presence and appearance. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364, 1535 (2009), 3559--3565.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Timothy W Bickmore, Laura M Pfeifer, and Brian W Jack. 2009. Taking the time to care: empowering low health literacy hospital patients with virtual nurse agents. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1265--1274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jim Blascovich, Jack Loomis, Andrew C Beall, Kimberly R Swinth, Crystal L Hoyt, and Jeremy N Bailenson. 2002. Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry 13, 2 (2002), 103--124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Gary L Brase and Jillian Richmond. 2004. The White--coat effect: physician attire and perceived authority, friendliness, and attractiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 34, 12 (2004), 2469--2481.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Justine Cassell, Hannes Högni Vilhjálmsson, and Timothy Bickmore. 2001. Beat: the behavior expression animation toolkit. In Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. ACM, 477--486. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jennifer M Dacy and Stanley L Brodsky. 1992. Effects of therapist attire and gender. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 29, 3 (1992), 486.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. David DeVault, Ron Artstein, Grace Benn, Teresa Dey, Ed Fast, Alesia Gainer, Kallirroi Georgila, Jon Gratch, Arno Hartholt, Margaux Lhommet, et al. 2014. SimSensei Kiosk: A virtual human interviewer for healthcare decision support. In Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 1061--1068. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Patrick Doyle. 2002. Believability through context using knowledge in the world to create intelligent characters. In Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems: part 1. ACM, 342--349. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. BJ Fogg, Jonathan Marshall, Tami Kameda, Joshua Solomon, Akshay Rangnekar, John Boyd, and Bonny Brown. 2001. Web credibility research: a method for online experiments and early study results. In CHI'01 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 295--296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Guy Gherardi, James Cameron, Andrew West, and Meg Crossley. 2009. Are we dressed to impress? A descriptive survey assessing patients' preference of doctors' attire in the hospital setting. Clinical medicine 9, 6 (2009), 519--524.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Moyez Jiwa, Stephan Millett, Xingqiong Meng, and Vivien M Hewitt. 2012. Impact of the presence of medical equipment in images on viewers' perceptions of the trustworthiness of an individual on-screen. Journal of medical Internet research 14, 4 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Yoon Jeon Koh and S Shyam Sundar. 2010. Effects of specialization in computers, web sites, and web agents on e-commerce trust. International journal of human-computer studies 68, 12 (2010), 899--912. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Eun-Ju Lee. 2010. What triggers social responses to flattering computers? Experimental tests of anthropomorphism and mindlessness explanations. Communication Research 37, 2 (2010), 191--214.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Tze Wei Liew and Su-Mae Tan. 2017. Exploring the effects of specialist versus generalist embodied virtual agents in a multi-product category online store. Telematics and Informatics (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Michael Mateas. 1999. An Oz-centric review of interactive drama and believable agents. In Artificial intelligence today. Springer, 297--328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Clifford Nass and Youngme Moon. 2000. Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of social issues 56, 1 (2000), 81--103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Kristine L Nowak. 2004. The influence of anthropomorphism and agency on social judgment in virtual environments. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 9, 2 (2004), JCMC925.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Kristine L Nowak, Mark A Hamilton, and Chelsea C Hammond. 2009. The effect of image features on judgments of homophily, credibility, and intention to use as avatars in future interactions. Media Psychology 12, 1 (2009), 50--76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Nikiforos M Papachristos, Ioannis Vrellis, Antonis Natsis, and Tassos A Mikropoulos. 2014. The role of environment design in an educational Multi-User Virtual Environment. British Journal of Educational Technology 45, 4 (2014), 636--646.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Shakaib U Rehman, Paul J Nietert, Dennis W Cope, and Anne Osborne Kilpatrick. 2005. What to wear today? Effect of doctor's attire on the trust and confidence of patients. The American journal of medicine 118, 11 (2005), 1279--1286.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Lazlo Ring, Dina Utami, and Timothy Bickmore. 2014. The right agent for the job?. In International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. Springer, 374--384.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Jong-Eun Roselyn Lee, Clifford Nass, Scott Brenner Brave, Yasunori Morishima, Hiroshi Nakajima, and Ryota Yamada. 2006. The case for caring colearners: The effects of a computer-mediated colearner agent on trust and learning. Journal of Communication 57, 2 (2006), 183--204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Youssef Shiban, Iris Schelhorn, Verena Jobst, Alexander Hörnlein, Frank Puppe, Paul Pauli, and Andreas Mühlberger. 2015. The appearance effect: Influences of virtual agent features on performance and motivation. Computers in Human Behavior 49 (2015), 5--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Lawrence R Wheeless and Janis Grotz. 1977. The measurement of trust and its relationship to self-disclosure. Human Communication Research 3, 3 (1977), 250--257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Looking the Part: The Effect of Attire and Setting on Perceptions of a Virtual Health Counselor

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        IVA '18: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents
        November 2018
        381 pages
        ISBN:9781450360135
        DOI:10.1145/3267851

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 November 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        IVA '18 Paper Acceptance Rate17of82submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate53of196submissions,27%

        Upcoming Conference

        IVA '24
        ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents
        September 16 - 19, 2024
        GLASGOW , United Kingdom

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader