skip to main content
10.1145/3269206.3271695acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

PARL: Let Strangers Speak Out What You Like

Published:17 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Review-based methods are one of the dominant methods to address the data sparsity problem of recommender system. However, the performance of most existing review-based methods will degrade when the review is also sparse. To this end, we propose a method to exploit user-item p air-dependent features from a uxiliary r eviews written by l ike-minded users (PARL) to address such problem. That is, both the reviews written by the user and the reviews written for the item are incorporated to highlight the useful features covered by the auxiliary reviews. PARL not only alleviates the sparsity problem of reviews but also produce extra informative features to further improve the accuracy of rating prediction. More importantly, it is designed as a plug-and-play model which can be plugged into various deep recommender systems to improve recommendations provided by them. Extensive experiments on five real-world datasets show that PARL achieves better prediction accuracy than other state-of-the-art alternatives. Also, with the exploitation of auxiliary reviews, the performance of PARL is robust on datasets with different characteristics.

References

  1. Iman Barjasteh, Rana Forsati, Farzan Masrour, Abdol-Hossein Esfahanian, and Hayder Radha. 2015. Cold-Start Item and User Recommendation with Decoupled Completion and Transduction. In RecSys. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Robert M. Bell and Yehuda Koren. 2007. Scalable Collaborative Filtering with Jointly Derived Neighborhood Interpolation Weights. In ICDM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. David M. Blei, Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan. 2003. Latent Dirichlet Allocation. JMLR (2003). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Rose Catherine and William W. Cohen. 2017. TransNets: Learning to Transform for Recommendation. In RecSys. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chong Chen, Min Zhang, Yiqun Liu, and Shaoping Ma. 2018. Neural Attentional Rating Regression with Review-level Explanations. In WWW. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jingyuan Chen, Hanwang Zhang, Xiangnan He, Liqiang Nie, Wei Liu, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2017. Attentive Collaborative Filtering: Multimedia Recommendation with Item- and Component-Level Attention. In SIGIR. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kostadin Georgiev and Preslav Nakov. 2013. A non-IID Framework for Collaborative Filtering with Restricted Boltzmann Machines. In ICML. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Guibing Guo, Jie Zhang, and Neil Yorke-Smith. 2015. TrustSVD: Collaborative Filtering with Both the Explicit and Implicit Influence of User Trust and of Item Ratings. In AAAI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ruining He and Julian McAuley. 2016. Ups and Downs: Modeling the Visual Evolution of Fashion Trends with One-Class Collaborative Filtering. In WWW. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Xiangnan He, Lizi Liao, Hanwang Zhang, Liqiang Nie, Xia Hu, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2017. Neural Collaborative Filtering. In WWW. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jonathan L. Herlocker, Joseph A. Konstan, Al Borchers, and John Riedl. 1999. An Algorithmic Framework for Performing Collaborative Filtering. In SIGIR. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Mohsen Jamali and Martin Ester. 2009. TrustWalker: a random walk model for combining trust-based and item-based recommendation. In SIGKDD. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Dong Hyun Kim, Chanyoung Park, Jinoh Oh, Sungyoung Lee, and Hwanjo Yu. 2016. Convolutional Matrix Factorization for Document Context-Aware Recommendation. In RecSys.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Yehuda Koren. 2008. Factorization meets the neighborhood: a multifaceted collaborative filtering model. In KDD. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Yehuda Koren, Robert M. Bell, and Chris Volinsky. 2009. Matrix Factorization Techniques for Recommender Systems. IEEE Computer 8 (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hui Li, Dingming Wu, Wenbin Tang, and Nikos Mamoulis. 2015. Overlapping Community Regularization for Rating Prediction in Social Recommender Systems. In RecSys. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Piji Li, Zihao Wang, Zhaochun Ren, Lidong Bing, and Wai Lam. 2017. Neural Rating Regression with Abstractive Tips Generation for Recommendation. In SIGIR. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Dawen Liang, Jaan Altosaar, Laurent Charlin, and David M. Blei. 2016. Factorization Meets the Item Embedding: Regularizing Matrix Factorization with Item Co-occurrence. In RecSys. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Guang Ling, Michael R. Lyu, and Irwin King. 2014. Ratings meet reviews, a combined approach to recommend. In RecSys. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Julian J. McAuley and Jure Leskovec. 2013. Hidden factors and hidden topics: understanding rating dimensions with review text. In RecSys. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Julian J. McAuley, Jure Leskovec, and Dan Jurafsky. 2012. Learning Attitudes and Attributes from Multi-aspect Reviews. In ICDM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. N. Ng, R. Gabriel, J. McAuley, C. Elkan, and Z. Lipton. 2017. Predicting surgery duration with neural heteroscedastic regression. In MLHC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Steffen Rendle. 2010. Factorization Machines. In ICDM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ruslan Salakhutdinov and Andriy Mnih. 2007. Probabilistic Matrix Factorization. In NIPS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Andriy Mnih, and Geoffrey E. Hinton. 2007. Restricted Boltzmann machines for collaborative filtering. In ICML. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Sungyong Seo, Jing Huang, Hao Yang, and Yan Liu. 2017. Interpretable Convolutional Neural Networks with Dual Local and Global Attention for Review Rating Prediction. In RecSys. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Kai Shu, Suhang Wang, Jiliang Tang, Yilin Wang, and Huan Liu. 2018. CrossFire: Cross Media Joint Friend and Item Recommendations. In WSDM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey E. Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2014. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. JMLR 1 (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Xiaoyuan Su and Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar. 2009. A Survey of Collaborative Filtering Techniques. Adv. Artificial Intellegence (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Yunzhi Tan, Min Zhang, Yiqun Liu, and Shaoping Ma. 2016. Rating-Boosted Latent Topics: Understanding Users and Items with Ratings and Reviews. In IJCAI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Jiliang Tang, Suhang Wang, Xia Hu, Dawei Yin, Yingzhou Bi, Yi Chang, and Huan Liu. 2016. Recommendation with Social Dimensions. In AAAI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Tijmen Tieleman and Geoffrey Hinton. 2012. Lecture 6.5-rmsprop: Divide the gradient by a running average of its recent magnitude. COURSERA: Neural networks for machine learning 2 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Chong Wang and David M. Blei. 2011. Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles. In KDD. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Hao Wang, Naiyan Wang, and Dit-Yan Yeung. 2015. Collaborative Deep Learning for Recommender Systems. In KDD. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Libing Wu, Cong Quan, Chenliang Li, Qian Wang, and Bolong Zheng. 2017. A Context-Aware User-Item Representation Learning for Item Recommendation. CoRR , Vol. abs/1712.02342 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Wei Zhang, Quan Yuan, Jiawei Han, and Jianyong Wang. 2016. Collaborative Multi-Level Embedding Learning from Reviews for Rating Prediction. In IJCAI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Lei Zheng, Vahid Noroozi, and Philip S. Yu. 2017. Joint Deep Modeling of Users and Items Using Reviews for Recommendation. In WSDM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. PARL: Let Strangers Speak Out What You Like

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '18: Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
      October 2018
      2362 pages
      ISBN:9781450360142
      DOI:10.1145/3269206

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 October 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CIKM '18 Paper Acceptance Rate147of826submissions,18%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader