ABSTRACT
Online and blended learning are employed by educators in a wide variety of fields, from literature to computer science, from medicine to astronomy. However, online and, specifically, MOOC and SPOC technologies are still not widespread in the field of conceptual modelling. The complex nature of conceptual modelling as a subject to be taught at the university level, as well as the increasing number of students, pose a certain challenge to the modern educators and call for a thorough review of the teaching methods, types of assessment and technologies used to support the learning process. In this paper, we provide an experience report on a redesigned master level university course on conceptual modelling, which employs blended learning approach. We investigate the aspects of students' behavior, performance and perception of the course, and reflect on the possibilities of transition from a SPOC in the context of blended learning to an exclusively online MOOC. This experience may provide valuable insights for the conceptual modelling educators planning to introduce blended or online learning and/or utilize formative assessment in their pedagogical activities.
- M. Al-Atabi and J. DeBoer. 2014. Teaching entrepreneurship using Massive Open Online Course (MOOC). Technovation 34, 4 (April 2014), 261--264.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Al-Emran, H. M. Elsherif, and Kh. Shaalan. 2016. Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education. Comput. Human Behav. 56, (March 2016), 93--102. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Bogdanova and M. Snoeck. 2017. Domain modelling in bloom: Deciphering how we teach It. In Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing.Google Scholar
- S. Combéfis, A. Bibal, and P. Van Roy. 2014. Recasting a Traditional Course into a MOOC by Means of a SPOC. Proc. Eur. MOOC Stakehold. Summit 2014 (2014).Google Scholar
- G. Deeva, J. De Smedt, P. De Koninck, and J. De Weerdt. 2018. Dropout Prediction in MOOCs: A Comparison Between Process and Sequence Mining. . Springer, Cham, 243--255.Google Scholar
- C. Delgado Kloos, P. J. Munoz-Merino, C. Alario-Hoyos, I. Estevez Ayres, and C. Fernandez-Panadero. 2015. Mixing and blending MOOC Technologies with face-to-face pedagogies. In 2015 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 967--971.Google Scholar
- W. Guo. 2014. From SPOC to MPOC - The Effective Practice of Peking University Online Teacher Training. In 2014 International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology, 258--264. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Van Hentenryck and C. Coffrin. 2014. Teaching creative problem solving in a MOOC. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education - SIGCSE '14, 677--682. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. McCutcheon, M. Lohan, M. Traynor, and D. Martin. 2015. A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. face-to-face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education. J. Adv. Nurs. 71, 2 (February 2015), 255--270.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Sandeen. 2013. Integrating MOOCS into Traditional Higher Education: The Emerging "MOOC 3.0" Era. Chang Mag. High. Learn. 45, 6 (November 2013), 34--39.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Snoeck and G. Dedene. 1998. Existence dependency: The key to semantic integrity between structural and behavioral aspects of object types. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 24, 4 (April 1998), 233--251. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Snoeck. 2014. Enterprise Information Systems Engineering: The MERODE Approach. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Snoeck. 2017. UML Class Diagrams for Software Engineering | edX. Retrieved July 10, 2017 from https://www.edx.org/course/uml-class-diagrams-software-engineering-kuleuvenx-umlxGoogle Scholar
- D. R. Stikkolorum, B. Demuth, V. Zaytsev, F. Boulanger, and J. Gray. 2014. The MOOC hype: Can we ignore it? Reflections on the current use of massive open online courses in software modeling education. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings.Google Scholar
- A. Vihavainen, M. Luukkainen, and J. Kurhila. 2013. MOOC as semester-long entrance exam. In Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM SIGITE conference on Information technology education - SIGITE '13, 177. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Using MOOC technology and formative assessment in a conceptual modelling course: an experience report
Recommendations
Use of personalized feedback reports in a blended conceptual modelling course
MODELS '19: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and SystemsDespite the substantial number of existing publications on conceptual modelling education and feedback, in particular, the perfect balance between the effectiveness of feedback and the costs of the feedback design tailored to the field-specific needs of ...
Perception of MOOC Pedagogical Tools and Learners' Learning Styles in MOOC Blended Teaching: a Case Study
ICEBT '19: Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on E-Education, E-Business and E-TechnologyRapid development has been achieved since the emergence of MOOC in 2008, but there are still many defects in the popularization of MOOC. Developing blended teaching by utilizing is considered to be one of effective means to overcome these shortcomings. ...
Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature
As online and blended learning has become common place educational strategy in higher education, educators need to reconceptualise fundamental issues of teaching, learning and assessment in non traditional spaces. These issues include concepts such as ...
Comments