skip to main content
10.1145/3271553.3271620acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicvispConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Wearable Technologies for Enhanced Soldier Situational Awareness

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 August 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a design and functional prototype of a wearable technology for command and control of a remotely-operated ground vehicle used for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance missions. A novel interface using hand motions, gestures, and a hands-free display allows the operator to control the robot using standard military hand and arm signals. We leverage existing lightweight wearable sensing and feedback mechanisms to allow soldiers the ability to maintain situational awareness while providing instructions to their robotic squad members. This paper presents recent test results of the system and its sensors using the proposed feedback and control mechanisms.

References

  1. https://www.myo.com/techspecs, March 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. H. K. Ali, M. A. Azman, Z. H. Ismail, et al. Real-time hand gestures system for mobile robots control. Procedia Engineering, 41:798--804, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. U. Army. Fm 21-60 visual signals. 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Bailey, S. Orzel, G. Hills, and K. Mosna. Portion of an expandable armband, Nov. 3 2015. US Patent D742,272.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. G. Hill, D. Barber, and A. W. Evans III. Achieving the vision of effective soldier-robot teaming: Recent work in multimodal communication. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts, pages 177--178. ACM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. H.-M. Huang. Autonomy levels for unmanned systems (alfus) framework: Safety and application issues. In Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop on Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems, PerMIS '07, pages 48--53, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. iRobot Corporation. iRobot 510 PackBot, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. W. Ivanich and B. Xu. Systems and methods for hand gesture control of an electronic device, Apr. 23 2013. US Patent 8,428,368.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. I. Jang and W. Park. A gesture-based control for handheld devices using accelerometer. In Proceedings of the 9th Iberoamerican Congress on Pattern Recognition, volume 3287, pages 259--266, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. P. Jia, H. H. Hu, T. Lu, and K. Yuan. Head gesture recognition for hands-free control of an intelligent wheelchair. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 34(1):60--68, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. C. Korpela, K. Chaney, and P. Brahmbhatt. Applied robotics for installation and base operations for industrial hygiene. In Technologies for Practical Robot Applications (TePRA), 2015 IEEE International Conference on, pages 1--6. IEEE, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M. Nam, M. U. Ahmed, Y. Shen, and P. K. Rhee. Mouth tracking for hands-free robot control systems. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 12(3):628--636, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. D. of Defense. The unmanned systems integrated roadmap fy 2011-2036. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. B. Park, S. Song, J. Kim, and W. P. H. Jang. User customization methods based on mental models: modular ui optimized for customizing in handheld device. Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Platforms and Techniques, pages 445--451, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Recon Robotics. ThrowBot XT with Audio, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. M. Sathiyanarayanan and S. Rajan. Myo armband for physiotherapy healthcare: A case study using gesture recognition application. In Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS), 2016 8th International Conference on, pages 1--6. IEEE, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. W. Shontz and G. Trumm. Perceptual processes and current helmet-mounted display concepts. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Honeywell Inc. Technical Note TN-1, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. E. Svensson, M. Angelborg-Thanderez, L. Sjöberg, and S. Olsson. Information complexity-mental workload and performance in combat aircraft. Ergonomics, 40(3):362--380, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Tal Oron-Gilad. Interfaces for Ground and Air Military Robots: Workshop Summary. National Academies Press, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Wearable Technologies for Enhanced Soldier Situational Awareness

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICVISP 2018: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Vision, Image and Signal Processing
        August 2018
        402 pages
        ISBN:9781450365291
        DOI:10.1145/3271553

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 27 August 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate186of424submissions,44%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader