skip to main content
10.1145/3274192.3274212acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluating the PROMISE framework for Trust in Sharing Economy System

Published:22 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The PROMISE (Project Oriented towards Modeling trust Interactions in the Sharing Economy) framework was proposed to represent the users trust in the sharing economy. PROMISE'S proposal was grounded on the literature. In this paper we present a two-step analysis of the framework. To do so, we applied the Semiotic Inspection Method (SIM) in order to reconstruct the designer message to users, and a coding step was applied to evaluate the users experience with the sharing economy. As a result, we have identified some aspects that PROMISE was not able to represent well, and have proposed changes on the framework.

References

  1. Orlando Afonso, Luciana Salgado, and José Viterbo. 2017. Strategies for Communicating Reputation Mechanisms in Crowdsourcing-Based Applications. In Social Computing and Social Media. Applications and Analytics, Gabriele Meiselwitz (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 3--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Anil Bilgihan, Khaldoon Nusair, Fevzi Okumus, and Cihan Cobanoglu. 2015. Applying flow theory to booking experiences: An integrated model in an online service context. Information Management 52, 6 (2015), 668--678. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. R. Botsman and R. Rogers. 2010. What's Mine is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption. Harper Business, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza, Carla Faria Leitão, Raquel Oliveira Prates, Sílvia Amélia Bim, and Elton José da Silva. 2010. Can Inspection Methods Generate Valid New Knowledge in HCI? The Case of Semiotic Inspection. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 68, 1--2 (Jan. 2010), 22--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza, Carla Faria Leitão, Raquel Oliveira Prates, and Elton José da Silva. 2006. The Semiotic Inspection Method. In Proceedings of VII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 148--157. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza and Carla Faria LeitÃčo. 2009. Semiotic Engineering Methods for Scientific Research in HCI. Morgan Claypool Publishers. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Tawanna R. Dillahunt and Amelia R. Malone. 2015. The Promise of the Sharing Economy Among Disadvantaged Communities. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2285--2294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Geanderson Esteves dos Santos. {n. d.}. PROMISE: um Modelo de Confiabilidade para Sistemas de Economia Colaborativa, Year = 2018. Master's thesis. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Geanderson E. dos Santos and Raquel O. Prates. 2017. Uma Análise de Confiabilidade em Pesquisas em Sistemas de Economia Colaborativa. 14 Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas Colaborativos (2017), 1387--1401.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Eyal Ert, Aliza Fleischer, and Nathan Magen. 2016. Trust and reputation in the sharing economy: The role of personal photos in Airbnb. Tourism Management 55 (2016), 62--73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Uwe Flick. 2009. An Introduction to Qualitative Research (4th edition ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Andrey Fradkin, Elena Grewal, Dave Holtz, and Matthew Pearson. 2015. Bias and Reciprocity in Online Reviews: Evidence From Field Experiments on Airbnb. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 641--641. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Barbara Hartl, Eva Hofmann, and Erich Kirchler. 2016. Do we need rules for "what's mine is yours"? Governance in collaborative consumption communities. Journal of Business Research 69, 8 (2016), 2756-- 2763.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Airi Lampinen and Coye Cheshire. 2016. Hosting via Airbnb: Motivations and Financial Assurances in Monetized Network Hospitality. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1669--1680. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Donghun Lee, Woochang Hyun, Jeongwoo Ryu, Woo Jung Lee, Wonjong Rhee, and Bongwon Suh. 2015. An Analysis of Social Features Associated with Room Sales of Airbnb. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW'15 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 219--222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Carla Faria Leitão and Raquel Oliveira Prates. 2017. A Aplicação de Métodos Qualitativos em Computação. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Marianne Lumeau, David Masclet, and Thierry Penard. 2015. Reputation and social (dis)approval in feedback mechanisms: An experimental study. Journal of Economic Behavior Organization 112 (2015), 127--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Xiao Ma, Jeffrey T Hancock, Kenneth Lim Mingjie, and Mor Naaman. 2017. Self-Disclosure and Perceived Trustworthiness of Airbnb Host Profiles. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Mareike Möhlmann. 2016. Digital Trust and Peer-to-Peer Collaborative Consumption Platforms: A Mediation Analysis. New York University (NYU) - Leonard N. Stern School of Business (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. M. Nunes and J. Correia. 2013. Improving trust using online credibility sources and social network quality in P2P marketplaces. In 2013 8th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Sunjoo Oh and Jae Yun Moon. 2016. Calling for a Shared Understanding of the "Sharing Economy". In Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Electronic Commerce: E-Commerce in Smart Connected World (ICEC '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 35, 5 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Daniel Pargman, Elina Eriksson, and Adrian Friday. 2016. Limits to the Sharing Economy. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Computing Within Limits (LIMITS '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 12, 7 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. David Sánchez, Sergio Martínez, and Josep Domingo-Ferrer. 2016. Co-utile P2P ridesharing via decentralization and reputation management. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 73 (2016), 147--166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Evaluating the PROMISE framework for Trust in Sharing Economy System

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IHC '18: Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      October 2018
      488 pages
      ISBN:9781450366014
      DOI:10.1145/3274192

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 October 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      IHC '18 Paper Acceptance Rate42of166submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader